Connect with us

Accounting

DeFi companies win reprieve on tax reporting

Published

on

Decentralized finance companies are breathing a sigh of relief after the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service gave them a two-year delay on reporting their customers’ digital assets to the tax authorities.

In late December, the Treasury and the IRS issued final regulations on sales and exchanges of digital assets on the new Form 1099-DA for decentralized finance brokers, along with transition relief. The requirements for DeFi companies start on or after Jan. 1, 2027, two years later than the rules for centralized exchanges and platforms. The new rules are expected to generate a deluge of Form 1099-DA information reporting to the IRS from cryptocurrency brokers, traders, banks, wallet hubs and taxpayers starting on Jan. 1, 2025. But the DeFi companies may escape unscathed, expecially with the crypto friendly Trump administration already scaling back regulation and enforcement at the Securities and Exchange Commission.

“They’ve kind of carved back on the requirements on DeFi probably about as far as they could,” said Jonathan Jackel, managing director in EY’s information reporting and withholding practice. “Virtually the only part of DeFi that has any obligations at all under these regs are front-end service providers. So everybody in the other layers of the DeFi stack doesn’t need to worry about anything. It’s not nothing. It’s definitely a pretty significant concession. We only expect a very limited set of businesses to be doing this reporting.”

He pointed out that front-end DeFi service providers are not set up in a way that would make it easy for them to file the reports. “Their argument is we’re not doing enough in contributing to the sale of the crypto to make us do the tax report,” said Jackel. “The argument is you can’t call us a broker because we don’t actually make the sale happen. We’re only kind of assisting or helping or providing information or a coded instruction. But it’s not up to us to pass that instruction along or execute it. And the government basically said, but you are the guys in the position to know. Particularly if you’re in a position to make sure you get paid, you probably have a lot of control over other aspects of the transaction. You would know basically what the transaction is, and so we expect you to do this reporting. It’s certainly not going to be easy for front-end service providers to implement these rules.”

Three crypto industry groups — the Blockchain Association, the Texas Blockchain Council and the DeFi Education Fund — have filed a lawsuit against the IRS over the new regulations, claiming they violate the Administrative Procedure Act.

“There’s at least one lawsuit out there that I know about to enjoin the rules from going into effect,” said Jackel. “I guess we’ll see how the court feels about it.”

The additional two years may give the court time to sort out the matter, and the DeFi companies will also have more time to adjust. Crypto companies did not get as much leeway.

“They provided a similar phase-in on the regs that came out in July with respect to custodial wallet providers, and it certainly seems appropriate, given the nature of the industry, that there will be some time for implementation,” said Jackel. “They did not provide a ton of time to the custodial service providers. The regs came out in July, and they’re already in effect. Transactions happening right now are subject to reporting next year. So I think if there’s one thing that the industry needs more of, it’s time, and at least for DeFi, they do have a bit more time than everybody else, but it’s still a pretty heavy lift.”

It’s unclear whether the Trump administration might relax the regulations, which have been hashed out between the crypto industry and the Treasury and the IRS over the years since passage of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in 2021, which mandated the reporting.

“When the new regime takes over, is this going to turn around and get reversed?” said Thomas Shea, EY Americas financial services crypto tax leader. “It’s tough to think that would happen, given all of the time and energy spent in getting to this point. But you really never know.”

There may be some benefits to the reporting for the crypto industry, which has been calling for clearer rules. “It’s not so obvious,” said Jackel. “There’s clearly an expense, and a certain amount of effort that the industry has to go through. But there is the argument that having this kind of tax reporting is consistent with just a good customer experience. And if you want to legitimize crypto, then you’re going to have to do things like help people figure out what they should put on their tax return. It’s not so obvious that these regs are necessarily bad for crypto. There are certain folks in the crypto world who just want it to be another investment, like stocks or bonds or something like that. The fact that there’s going to be a clear way to deal with it on a tax return makes it easier for customers to deal with. And maybe that’s sort of pro industry to some extent. I don’t want to make it sound like it’s the easiest thing to comply with. There will be some significant expense and effort involved in implementing, but it’s not clear it’s entirely negative for the industry either.”

Even though the DeFi companies have an extra two years, crypto exchanges will need to start sending the Form 1099-DA this year.  

“I would certainly expect centralized exchanges to be ready to go because transactions occurring in 2025 are going to be reportable,” said Jackel. “Failing to comply is not really an option that’s available. With DeFi, it’s obviously a little bit less clear. There won’t really be the issue of complying until 2027, and then there’s the lawsuit. It’s conceivable that the court would say these rules don’t work and they’re not enforceable. And if that were the case, I wouldn’t expect anybody in the DeFi world to be doing reporting.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending