Connect with us

Accounting

Dems demand probe of Trump plan to use IRS on political foes

Published

on

Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee are asking the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration to investigate a recent report that the Trump administration plans to use the Internal Revenue Service to investigate prominent Democrats as well as left-leaning tax-exempt nonprofits, while three prominent Senate Democrats have written a letter of their own to IRS officials. 

According to the Wall Street Journal, the Trump administration is making plans to install Gary Shapley as head of the IRS Criminal Investigation unit and probe prominent Democratic party contributors such as billionaire philanthropist George Soros and his Open Society Foundations, along with other Democratic donors and organizations. 

Shapley was an IRS CI special agent and whistleblower who had complained during the Biden administration about preferential treatment during the tax probe of Hunter Biden, and testified before Congress about the investigation. Under the Trump administration, he was named special advisor to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in March and was briefly appointed acting IRS commissioner in April before he was replaced only a few days later amid a power struggle between Bessent and Elon Musk, who was in charge of the U.S. DOGE Service. Earlier this month, Shapley reached a legal settlement with the IRS and the Justice Department, along with fellow whistleblower Joseph Ziegler. 

The group of House Democrats on the tax-writing committee wrote a letter earlier this month to TIGTA’s acting inspector general, Heather Hill, requesting an “immediate investigation into this alarming report that the president is directing the IRS to open criminal investigations into Democratic donors and ‘left-leaning’ nonprofit organizations.”

“This report is reminiscent of President Nixon when he directed the IRS to audit and harass his ‘political enemies,” they wrote. “To guard against this type of political interference, Congress enacted Section 7217 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 7217 prohibits the president, the vice president, any employee of the executive office of the president, and any employee of the executive office of the vice president from requesting, directly or indirectly, any officer or employee of the IRS to conduct an audit or other investigation of any particular taxpayer. A violation of Section 7217 carries a criminal punishment of up to five years’ imprisonment and/or a $5,000 fine.”

They referred to earlier investigations during the Tea Party targeting scandal in 2012, when Republicans accused IRS officials of singling out conservative groups seeking grant tax-exempt status for extra scrutiny.

“It is well established that the IRS must do its work impartially and without political bias,” they added. “The committee investigated this issue in the past and all committee members were in full agreement that taxpayers should not be targeted based on their political beliefs. As our Republican colleagues have routinely stated, the IRS should never be weaponized against the American people or used to target individuals based on their political beliefs.” 

They also wrote a letter to the Republican chair of the Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Jason Smith, R- Missouri, asking him to immediately call a special meeting of the committee and invite Bessent, who is acting commissioner of the IRS as well as secretary of the Treasury, to “discuss agency operations amid alarming reports regarding employee furloughs and the administration’s reported plans to target taxpayers based on political beliefs.”

Three Senate Democrats, including Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York, and Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, are also demanding information from the IRS and the Treasury, sending a letter to Bessent and Shapley.

“Any effort to weaponize the IRS against President Trump’s perceived enemies is against the law, an abuse of power, and a threat to the integrity of our democratic institutions,” they wrote. “IRS-CI cannot be the president’s political attack dog. You must immediately end all attempts to politicize the agency, including attempts to use the agency to attack Americans with different political views.” 

David Klasing, a tax attorney and CPA who specializes in criminal tax defense, has been hearing concerns from IRS employees and taxpayers who are worried about the potential probes.

“I’ve been dealing with the IRS for almost 30 years now, and if you ask an IRS agent their political opinion on anything, most of the time, they’re going to clam up and they’re not going to give you an opinion because they strive very hard to be apolitical in what they do,” he told Accounting Today. “I think there will be attempts to do that, but I think the culture will be resistant.”

However, he sees that changing with the widespread cutbacks in IRS staffing this year from DOGE and the government shutdown

“Anybody who’s taking a job with the IRS after this bloodletting, the rumors I’m hearing is they’re basically taking an oath of loyalty to Donald Trump, and they need to be flying the flags of a Republican and not a Democrat to get hired,” said Klassing. “That’s what I think is going on.”

He admitted he doesn’t have evidence of this, but he has heard concerns from taxpayers who are worried about being targeted. 

“I get people calling me all the time that are convinced they’ve got criminal tax exposure, and they quit sleeping at night, and they’re getting ulcers,” he said. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending