Connect with us

Accounting

Dems demand probe of Trump plan to use IRS on political foes

Published

on

Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee are asking the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration to investigate a recent report that the Trump administration plans to use the Internal Revenue Service to investigate prominent Democrats as well as left-leaning tax-exempt nonprofits, while three prominent Senate Democrats have written a letter of their own to IRS officials. 

According to the Wall Street Journal, the Trump administration is making plans to install Gary Shapley as head of the IRS Criminal Investigation unit and probe prominent Democratic party contributors such as billionaire philanthropist George Soros and his Open Society Foundations, along with other Democratic donors and organizations. 

Shapley was an IRS CI special agent and whistleblower who had complained during the Biden administration about preferential treatment during the tax probe of Hunter Biden, and testified before Congress about the investigation. Under the Trump administration, he was named special advisor to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in March and was briefly appointed acting IRS commissioner in April before he was replaced only a few days later amid a power struggle between Bessent and Elon Musk, who was in charge of the U.S. DOGE Service. Earlier this month, Shapley reached a legal settlement with the IRS and the Justice Department, along with fellow whistleblower Joseph Ziegler. 

The group of House Democrats on the tax-writing committee wrote a letter earlier this month to TIGTA’s acting inspector general, Heather Hill, requesting an “immediate investigation into this alarming report that the president is directing the IRS to open criminal investigations into Democratic donors and ‘left-leaning’ nonprofit organizations.”

“This report is reminiscent of President Nixon when he directed the IRS to audit and harass his ‘political enemies,” they wrote. “To guard against this type of political interference, Congress enacted Section 7217 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 7217 prohibits the president, the vice president, any employee of the executive office of the president, and any employee of the executive office of the vice president from requesting, directly or indirectly, any officer or employee of the IRS to conduct an audit or other investigation of any particular taxpayer. A violation of Section 7217 carries a criminal punishment of up to five years’ imprisonment and/or a $5,000 fine.”

They referred to earlier investigations during the Tea Party targeting scandal in 2012, when Republicans accused IRS officials of singling out conservative groups seeking grant tax-exempt status for extra scrutiny.

“It is well established that the IRS must do its work impartially and without political bias,” they added. “The committee investigated this issue in the past and all committee members were in full agreement that taxpayers should not be targeted based on their political beliefs. As our Republican colleagues have routinely stated, the IRS should never be weaponized against the American people or used to target individuals based on their political beliefs.” 

They also wrote a letter to the Republican chair of the Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Jason Smith, R- Missouri, asking him to immediately call a special meeting of the committee and invite Bessent, who is acting commissioner of the IRS as well as secretary of the Treasury, to “discuss agency operations amid alarming reports regarding employee furloughs and the administration’s reported plans to target taxpayers based on political beliefs.”

Three Senate Democrats, including Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York, and Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, are also demanding information from the IRS and the Treasury, sending a letter to Bessent and Shapley.

“Any effort to weaponize the IRS against President Trump’s perceived enemies is against the law, an abuse of power, and a threat to the integrity of our democratic institutions,” they wrote. “IRS-CI cannot be the president’s political attack dog. You must immediately end all attempts to politicize the agency, including attempts to use the agency to attack Americans with different political views.” 

David Klasing, a tax attorney and CPA who specializes in criminal tax defense, has been hearing concerns from IRS employees and taxpayers who are worried about the potential probes.

“I’ve been dealing with the IRS for almost 30 years now, and if you ask an IRS agent their political opinion on anything, most of the time, they’re going to clam up and they’re not going to give you an opinion because they strive very hard to be apolitical in what they do,” he told Accounting Today. “I think there will be attempts to do that, but I think the culture will be resistant.”

However, he sees that changing with the widespread cutbacks in IRS staffing this year from DOGE and the government shutdown

“Anybody who’s taking a job with the IRS after this bloodletting, the rumors I’m hearing is they’re basically taking an oath of loyalty to Donald Trump, and they need to be flying the flags of a Republican and not a Democrat to get hired,” said Klassing. “That’s what I think is going on.”

He admitted he doesn’t have evidence of this, but he has heard concerns from taxpayers who are worried about being targeted. 

“I get people calling me all the time that are convinced they’ve got criminal tax exposure, and they quit sleeping at night, and they’re getting ulcers,” he said. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending