Connect with us

Accounting

DOGE cuts risk bogging down push to implement Trump’s tax breaks

Published

on

Staffing shortfalls and intricate new policies are complicating efforts at the Treasury Department and IRS to meet President Donald Trump’s tight deadlines for churning out guidance on his multitrillion-dollar tax bill. 

Just weeks after Trump signed the legislation into law, taxpayers are clamoring for more information from an Internal Revenue Service hit hard by cuts driven by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency task force. The agency’s staff shrunk some 25% from January through May. 

“It is a perfect storm: complex changes in the tax code, a reduced workforce at the IRS and an increased demand for guidance,” said Jennifer Acuna, a former Senate Finance Committee tax counsel, now national tax principal at KPMG LLP. “With this reduction in workforce it is just unclear how that is going to impact every aspect of the rollout.”

The Treasury’s Office of Tax Policy led by Ken Kies has been insulated from cutbacks, a decision that will help at least on the front end. Yet taxpayers are likely to experience long waits on phone calls and other delays when they have questions about actually complying with the new policies. 

Here’s a look at some of the thorniest issues:

A worker checks the bill at a restaurant in New York

Tips and overtime

PwC managing director Mark Prater said the top priority for the IRS will be the president’s campaign pledges of tax cuts on tips, overtime, and for older people and making sure they go smoothly. 

“You’re talking about a lot of taxpayers affected by those,” Prater said.

Government officials will have to sort out whether employers adjust their withholding for tipped and overtime employees or if the employees — for whom different situations will warrant different withholdings — should retain records and file for a refund at the end of the year.

Both employers and workers will have to report overtime pay, adding a new wrinkle for those filers.

“There’s a reporting structure in place for tips right now, but there really isn’t for overtime,” said Andrew Lautz, director of tax policy for the Bipartisan Policy Center. 

For tips, the issue will be defining who is a tipped worker, said Pete Sepp, president of the National Taxpayers Union. 

The IRS has a published list of occupations that “customarily” receive tips and there could be jockeying over whether any new occupations should join the list to qualify for the tax break.

Manufacturing

The bill creates a new tax break allowing businesses to deduct the cost of building new factories, and now it’s up to the Treasury and the IRS to define what types of structures qualify. 

“There’s probably going to be a lot of lobbying of the agency to be as expansive as possible,” said Ryan Abraham, a principal at Ernst & Young LLP and part of the firm’s Washington Council.

The provision, estimated to cost $141 billion over 10 years, allows businesses to deduct the cost of constructing a manufacturing plant immediately. Previously, it was spread out over 39 years. 

Sepp, of the National Taxpayers Union, said rules regarding renovated property could prove especially tricky.

“If you convert a warehouse to a manufacturing plant, what percentage can you claim?” he asked. For businesses there will be a challenge to figure out whether and how to file amended returns to claim expanded depreciation backdating now two years.

Energy credits

The Treasury and IRS must soon detail how it will wind down Biden administration energy tax incentives by complying with a July 7 executive order requiring strict enforcement of the new restrictions within 45 days.

The political compromise over wind and solar credits created a complex series of deadlines for phasing out the tax credit. In general, projects must be put into service by the end of 2027 to qualify for credits but there’s an exemption for projects that begin construction by next July. The terms involved need to be defined by the Treasury. 

“What does it mean to begin construction, is clearing a field enough?” Sepp said.

At the same time, there’s not a lot of existing Treasury and IRS guidance to implement the tougher restrictions on supply chains — particularly those crossing adversarial countries.

“These are pretty complicated new rules that Congress has just created,” EY’s Abraham said. “What kind of guidance can we really expect on such a short turnaround?”

International provisions

The IRS, Sepp said, is still trying to figure out how to implement a corporate alternative minimum tax imposed under the Biden administration and now must navigate how that interacts with provisions redefining how profits on foreign earnings are taxed for companies. 

Money transfer services are also eager for guidance on a new tax on remittances.

KPMG’s Acuna said new international provisions will be especially difficult given they also have to interact with Group of Seven “Pillar 2” tax rules for global companies.

“Multinational business structures are by definition complex,” she said.

Newborn savings

Lautz of the Bipartisan Policy Center said there’s “a lot of buzz” in the tax policy community and financial services sector about the tax-advantaged  “Trump Accounts” for newborns established by the law. 

“You are setting up investment accounts for millions upon millions of newborns,” he said. “A lot of rules need to be written around this one.”

The program allows parents to contribute as much as $5,000 a year to the investment account that the child can withdraw from after turning 18. The Treasury Department will seed each account with $1,000 for babies born between January of this year through 2028.

In particular, tax professionals are on the lookout for what types of investments will be allowed in the account, as well as how distributions are handled from a tax standpoint when a child turns 18.

“Candidly, I have heard different things from different experts,” Lautz said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Embedded AI and Automated Anomaly Detection Reshape Modern Corporate Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

Embedded AI and Automated Anomaly Detection Reshape Modern Corporate Accounting Frameworks

The accounting and audit landscape in 2026

The accounting and audit landscape in 2026 is defined by the full integration of artificial intelligence directly into core enterprise software platforms. Rather than operating as standalone third-party tools, generative AI, automated reconciliation, and continuous anomaly detection are now natively embedded within major ERP engines including SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, QuickBooks, and Sage. This technology integration is transforming daily financial operations, internal reporting controls, and external audit workflows.

Recent industry benchmark surveys reveal a widening performance gap

Recent industry benchmark surveys reveal a widening performance gap between finance teams utilizing integrated AI automation and those relying on legacy manual processes. Organizations actively leveraging embedded AI report up to 37% higher revenue per employee, driven by automated invoice matching, instant ledger entries, and predictive cash flow modeling. Routine, high-volume transactional tasks that once required manual intervention are now executed in real time with continuous digital audit trails.

AI introduces new governance and control responsibilities

However, the widespread deployment of embedded AI introduces new governance and control responsibilities for accounting professionals. Auditing standards now mandate strict verification protocols for algorithmically generated journal entries and financial commentary. External auditors are evaluating enterprise AI governance frameworks, reviewing automated rule sets, testing data ingestion pipelines, and ensuring that financial controllers maintain human-in-the-loop oversight over automated system outputs.

Furthermore, cloud governance and data security have become core operational skills for modern CPAs and controllers. As financial ledgers and client data stream through interconnected cloud ecosystem APIs, accounting teams must implement multi-factor access controls, continuous data encryption, and strict data privacy compliance to protect sensitive financial records from cyber vulnerabilities.

The embedding of AI into enterprise accounting software redefines internal financial controls and career requirements for accounting professionals. Business owners and finance leaders must update governance protocols, invest in staff digital literacy, and ensure accounting systems maintain rigorous audit compliance to capture productivity gains safely.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Mandatory ESG Reporting Standards Demand Standardized Non-Financial Audit Trails

Published

on

Mandatory ESG Reporting Standards Demand Standardized Non-Financial Audit Trails

Corporate accounting departments face an expanded regulatory mandate as mandatory sustainability and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting frameworks take full effect internationally. Governed by the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) IFRS S1 and S2 standards, enterprise financial controllers are now legally required to track, verify, and report non-financial data with the same internal controls and auditability as traditional financial statements.

The expansion shifts ESG compliance

This regulatory expansion shifts ESG compliance from marketing departments to corporate accounting offices. Financial managers are now responsible for gathering, consolidating, and verifying carbon emissions metrics, supply chain labor conditions, water usage, and climate risk exposures across multi-tiered corporate structures. These non-financial metrics must be integrated into standardized general ledgers to withstand rigorous third-party audit assurance processes.

To comply with these rigorous reporting mandates, accounting software providers have added dedicated ESG modules designed to aggregate data from IoT sensors, utility platforms, and vendor management systems. Controllers are implementing internal control frameworks—modeled after traditional COSO frameworks—to ensure the completeness, accuracy, and consistency of sustainability disclosures, protecting organizations against greenwashing penalties and litigation risks.

The transition requires significant cross-functional collaboration between accounting teams, legal counsel, and operational directors. Accounting professionals are expanding their technical expertise beyond financial ledgers to master carbon accounting methodologies, lifecycle assessment standards, and non-financial data governance protocols, fundamentally expanding the role of the modern corporate accountant.

Why This Information Matters
Mandatory ESG disclosures require companies to treat environmental and social metrics as audited financial records. Executives, accountants, and board members must institute formal tracking and assurance processes to satisfy legal mandates, maintain investor confidence, and mitigate regulatory non-compliance risks.

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Trending