Connect with us

Accounting

DOGE cuts risk bogging down push to implement Trump’s tax breaks

Published

on

Staffing shortfalls and intricate new policies are complicating efforts at the Treasury Department and IRS to meet President Donald Trump’s tight deadlines for churning out guidance on his multitrillion-dollar tax bill. 

Just weeks after Trump signed the legislation into law, taxpayers are clamoring for more information from an Internal Revenue Service hit hard by cuts driven by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency task force. The agency’s staff shrunk some 25% from January through May. 

“It is a perfect storm: complex changes in the tax code, a reduced workforce at the IRS and an increased demand for guidance,” said Jennifer Acuna, a former Senate Finance Committee tax counsel, now national tax principal at KPMG LLP. “With this reduction in workforce it is just unclear how that is going to impact every aspect of the rollout.”

The Treasury’s Office of Tax Policy led by Ken Kies has been insulated from cutbacks, a decision that will help at least on the front end. Yet taxpayers are likely to experience long waits on phone calls and other delays when they have questions about actually complying with the new policies. 

Here’s a look at some of the thorniest issues:

A worker checks the bill at a restaurant in New York

Tips and overtime

PwC managing director Mark Prater said the top priority for the IRS will be the president’s campaign pledges of tax cuts on tips, overtime, and for older people and making sure they go smoothly. 

“You’re talking about a lot of taxpayers affected by those,” Prater said.

Government officials will have to sort out whether employers adjust their withholding for tipped and overtime employees or if the employees — for whom different situations will warrant different withholdings — should retain records and file for a refund at the end of the year.

Both employers and workers will have to report overtime pay, adding a new wrinkle for those filers.

“There’s a reporting structure in place for tips right now, but there really isn’t for overtime,” said Andrew Lautz, director of tax policy for the Bipartisan Policy Center. 

For tips, the issue will be defining who is a tipped worker, said Pete Sepp, president of the National Taxpayers Union. 

The IRS has a published list of occupations that “customarily” receive tips and there could be jockeying over whether any new occupations should join the list to qualify for the tax break.

Manufacturing

The bill creates a new tax break allowing businesses to deduct the cost of building new factories, and now it’s up to the Treasury and the IRS to define what types of structures qualify. 

“There’s probably going to be a lot of lobbying of the agency to be as expansive as possible,” said Ryan Abraham, a principal at Ernst & Young LLP and part of the firm’s Washington Council.

The provision, estimated to cost $141 billion over 10 years, allows businesses to deduct the cost of constructing a manufacturing plant immediately. Previously, it was spread out over 39 years. 

Sepp, of the National Taxpayers Union, said rules regarding renovated property could prove especially tricky.

“If you convert a warehouse to a manufacturing plant, what percentage can you claim?” he asked. For businesses there will be a challenge to figure out whether and how to file amended returns to claim expanded depreciation backdating now two years.

Energy credits

The Treasury and IRS must soon detail how it will wind down Biden administration energy tax incentives by complying with a July 7 executive order requiring strict enforcement of the new restrictions within 45 days.

The political compromise over wind and solar credits created a complex series of deadlines for phasing out the tax credit. In general, projects must be put into service by the end of 2027 to qualify for credits but there’s an exemption for projects that begin construction by next July. The terms involved need to be defined by the Treasury. 

“What does it mean to begin construction, is clearing a field enough?” Sepp said.

At the same time, there’s not a lot of existing Treasury and IRS guidance to implement the tougher restrictions on supply chains — particularly those crossing adversarial countries.

“These are pretty complicated new rules that Congress has just created,” EY’s Abraham said. “What kind of guidance can we really expect on such a short turnaround?”

International provisions

The IRS, Sepp said, is still trying to figure out how to implement a corporate alternative minimum tax imposed under the Biden administration and now must navigate how that interacts with provisions redefining how profits on foreign earnings are taxed for companies. 

Money transfer services are also eager for guidance on a new tax on remittances.

KPMG’s Acuna said new international provisions will be especially difficult given they also have to interact with Group of Seven “Pillar 2” tax rules for global companies.

“Multinational business structures are by definition complex,” she said.

Newborn savings

Lautz of the Bipartisan Policy Center said there’s “a lot of buzz” in the tax policy community and financial services sector about the tax-advantaged  “Trump Accounts” for newborns established by the law. 

“You are setting up investment accounts for millions upon millions of newborns,” he said. “A lot of rules need to be written around this one.”

The program allows parents to contribute as much as $5,000 a year to the investment account that the child can withdraw from after turning 18. The Treasury Department will seed each account with $1,000 for babies born between January of this year through 2028.

In particular, tax professionals are on the lookout for what types of investments will be allowed in the account, as well as how distributions are handled from a tax standpoint when a child turns 18.

“Candidly, I have heard different things from different experts,” Lautz said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending