Connect with us

Accounting

How to win back time lost on client communications

Published

1 year ago

on

Accountants and bookkeepers spend hours per week on client communication, from scheduling and confirming appointments to flagging paperwork deadlines and chasing invoices, especially during peak seasons. More than just a source of frustration (for all parties), this time suck can equate to lost billable hours, delayed payments, less time for high-value work and even strained client relationships.

As firms and CPAs continue to face the pressures of tightened margins, maintaining steady streams of cash flow and meeting evolving client expectations, the invoicing process in particular has quietly become a key friction point. The issue isn’t so much about billable hours but improving processes and customer relations. Reducing missed payments, sending timely follow-ups, and maintaining efficient communication habits are key to both client satisfaction and productivity levels.

Where do you start? Look at your firm’s tech stack — a term we use quite loosely. The truth is, CPAs and bookkeepers likely have more than enough user-friendly tools already at their disposal. The trick is understanding how to use them to their maximum capabilities.

Understanding the hidden cost of inefficient client communication

Interfacing with clients, establishing key dates and deadlines, and providing reminders and notifications are essential to the daily functioning of many businesses, none more so than accounting firms. Given the nature of the industry, which is subject to significant seasonal ebbs and flows, client communication is doubly consequential. Lost billable hours, delayed payments and bottlenecks in client service have not only a financial cost but a reputational cost as well.

Invoicing has become a growing friction point for CPAs, as documentation and reminders get lost in overstuffed inboxes or are dismissed amid a flurry of other daily notifications. We’re all busy, and try as we might to keep up, even the modern communication formats we’ve come to rely on are increasingly coming up short. Delayed and missed payments are becoming more frequent, even as client expectations around responsiveness and convenience are rising. The impact of peak seasons and tighter economic conditions only increases the tension and further fuels the imperative to hit the nail on the head with client communication.

How automation and scheduling tools can reduce manual workload

Technology has been a source of anxiety or intimidation for many in the workplace in recent years, as narratives of AI takeovers and automation-driven employee obsolescence have grabbed hold of the zeitgeist. Tech continues to support and even fully take over certain tasks in office settings. In the case of CPAs and accounting firms specifically, technology tools have the potential to be a time-saving and profit-boosting communication superhack.

Accessible and easy-to-use tech tools such as calendar-based reminders and scheduling, which are also often free of charge, help reduce unnecessary back-and-forth with clients. Giving back time to CPAs, bookkeepers and clients alike should be the goal. Automated functionality and scheduling tools also provide flexible options that cater to a wider range of client preferences, including self-serve options that allow clients to book time or pay invoices.

Why calendar-based systems are better than high-volume email

The go-to communication tool that streamlined client interactions and helped provide a useful paper trail for many industries, including accounting, was email. A game-changing tech tool that represented a quantum leap from phone communication, email has been a welcome development for both CPAs and their clients.

But email isn’t without its drawbacks. For busy clients whose inboxes fill up quickly, multiple emails — even sent for the clients’ benefit — can feel like an unwelcome intrusion. Additionally, they can be easily overlooked, or worse, wind up in a spam or junk folder based on settings that are out of the control of a firm or admin.

Calendar-based notifications and syncs are a less intrusive, inbox-free form of communication. They are passive but persistent, helping ensure clients don’t forget key actions and meeting them in an environment that they engage with frequently, typically multiple times a day.

These tools improve the client experience without requiring additional hiring or overextending teams, which amounts to a superpower for firms during busy seasons. Calendar-based tools are scalable systems that support small firms and solo practitioners as well as large firms, leaving more time for strategic, high-value work instead of rote logistical tasks.

A new communication mindset and building trust in tough times

Building a client communication strategy doesn’t start and end with a choice of tools or formats. How a firm interacts with its clients can build confidence and trust, or it can create doubt and frustration if executed inefficiently or unreliably.

Accounting firms would do well to foster a top-to-bottom mindset shift, one that moves away from reactive communication and toward proactive operations. Company training and sharing of best practices can help a firm ensure buy-in from employees and achieve cross-department alignment. The goal is to build a system that creates a seamless and professional client journey.

As it happens, automation and calendar-based tools provide comprehensive support in those efforts. By letting automation handle repetitive tasks, firms not only make fewer mistakes and experience less lag time in client communication, they free up employees to do what they do best — complex and critical-thinking tasks that are beyond the grasp of AI and automation tools. Most of all, these tools build trust. Engaging, timely reminders and fewer missed payments reduce the potential friction points that arise between CPAs and their clients, fostering stronger working relationships and better client retention. 

Technology alone won’t necessarily solve a firm’s poor client communication infrastructure. Keeping clients informed, avoiding invoicing and payment delays, and correcting communication inefficiencies requires a change in mindset as much as an adoption of a particular set of tools. But with the establishment of a proper approach, accounting industry professionals can incorporate calendar-based automated processes, scheduling software, reminders to tighten up invoicing operations, improve the client experience without adding more manual work, and ensure their firm’s communication channels hum with reliability and efficiency.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Accounting

Embedded AI and Automated Anomaly Detection Reshape Modern Corporate Accounting Frameworks

Published

12 hours ago

on

September 13, 2026

By

Embedded AI and Automated Anomaly Detection Reshape Modern Corporate Accounting Frameworks

The accounting and audit landscape in 2026

The accounting and audit landscape in 2026 is defined by the full integration of artificial intelligence directly into core enterprise software platforms. Rather than operating as standalone third-party tools, generative AI, automated reconciliation, and continuous anomaly detection are now natively embedded within major ERP engines including SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, QuickBooks, and Sage. This technology integration is transforming daily financial operations, internal reporting controls, and external audit workflows.

Recent industry benchmark surveys reveal a widening performance gap

Recent industry benchmark surveys reveal a widening performance gap between finance teams utilizing integrated AI automation and those relying on legacy manual processes. Organizations actively leveraging embedded AI report up to 37% higher revenue per employee, driven by automated invoice matching, instant ledger entries, and predictive cash flow modeling. Routine, high-volume transactional tasks that once required manual intervention are now executed in real time with continuous digital audit trails.

AI introduces new governance and control responsibilities

However, the widespread deployment of embedded AI introduces new governance and control responsibilities for accounting professionals. Auditing standards now mandate strict verification protocols for algorithmically generated journal entries and financial commentary. External auditors are evaluating enterprise AI governance frameworks, reviewing automated rule sets, testing data ingestion pipelines, and ensuring that financial controllers maintain human-in-the-loop oversight over automated system outputs.

Furthermore, cloud governance and data security have become core operational skills for modern CPAs and controllers. As financial ledgers and client data stream through interconnected cloud ecosystem APIs, accounting teams must implement multi-factor access controls, continuous data encryption, and strict data privacy compliance to protect sensitive financial records from cyber vulnerabilities.

The embedding of AI into enterprise accounting software redefines internal financial controls and career requirements for accounting professionals. Business owners and finance leaders must update governance protocols, invest in staff digital literacy, and ensure accounting systems maintain rigorous audit compliance to capture productivity gains safely.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Mandatory ESG Reporting Standards Demand Standardized Non-Financial Audit Trails

Published

1 week ago

on

September 5, 2026

By

Mandatory ESG Reporting Standards Demand Standardized Non-Financial Audit Trails

Corporate accounting departments face an expanded regulatory mandate as mandatory sustainability and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting frameworks take full effect internationally. Governed by the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) IFRS S1 and S2 standards, enterprise financial controllers are now legally required to track, verify, and report non-financial data with the same internal controls and auditability as traditional financial statements.

The expansion shifts ESG compliance

This regulatory expansion shifts ESG compliance from marketing departments to corporate accounting offices. Financial managers are now responsible for gathering, consolidating, and verifying carbon emissions metrics, supply chain labor conditions, water usage, and climate risk exposures across multi-tiered corporate structures. These non-financial metrics must be integrated into standardized general ledgers to withstand rigorous third-party audit assurance processes.

To comply with these rigorous reporting mandates, accounting software providers have added dedicated ESG modules designed to aggregate data from IoT sensors, utility platforms, and vendor management systems. Controllers are implementing internal control frameworks—modeled after traditional COSO frameworks—to ensure the completeness, accuracy, and consistency of sustainability disclosures, protecting organizations against greenwashing penalties and litigation risks.

The transition requires significant cross-functional collaboration between accounting teams, legal counsel, and operational directors. Accounting professionals are expanding their technical expertise beyond financial ledgers to master carbon accounting methodologies, lifecycle assessment standards, and non-financial data governance protocols, fundamentally expanding the role of the modern corporate accountant.

Why This Information Matters
Mandatory ESG disclosures require companies to treat environmental and social metrics as audited financial records. Executives, accountants, and board members must institute formal tracking and assurance processes to satisfy legal mandates, maintain investor confidence, and mitigate regulatory non-compliance risks.

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

3 weeks ago

on

August 25, 2026

By

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Trending