Connect with us

Accounting

Donor advised funds’ tax benefits shown by client scenarios

Published

on

Financial advisors and charitable-minded clients can tap into tax savings through donor-advised funds when balancing portfolios, making regular gifts and after windfalls, according to an expert.

Those three scenarios show in part why donor-advised funds have amassed around $230 billion in assets — with another trillion dollars in growth expected for the next decade, according to a presentation at this week’s Future Proof conference by Adam Nash, an angel investor and former Wealthfront CEO who’s now CEO of Daffy, a donor-advised funds service. 

The other reasons for that rising popularity include the flexibility with an upfront deduction for the donation that doesn’t require a grant to be allocated immediately and the ability to send charities other types of assets besides cash such as appreciated stock or other securities, Nash noted.

In his presentation, Nash compared donor-advised funds to other types of tax-advantaged accounts that have evolved into pivotal roles as part of clients’ long-term financial plans over recent decades, like individual retirement accounts, 401(k) plans and 529 college savings plans.

“A donor-advised fund is basically the perfect account for putting money aside for charity,” Nash said. “You can put money or assets into the account, and you get an immediate tax deduction this year against income when you put the assets in the account. The accounts have investment options — some more than others — but your money is invested tax-free for as long as you want it to compound. And then any time you want to give money to an operating charity — it could just be a few clicks and that money gets sent off and taken care of. 

“And it’s not surprising that, even at the very high end, a lot of people are thinking about,” Nash added, “‘Do I really need to set up a foundation? Do I really need to set up a trust? I can just use a donor-advised fund to handle the philanthropy needs, the back end and the back office for my clients.”

READ MORE: IRS donor-advised fund proposal could have ‘chilling effect’

The three examples Nash laid out in his talk displayed the possible role of donor-advised funds in a client’s portfolio.

The sale of a stock that has risen in value or the spinoff of a part of a small business or another “positive event” can bring capital gains and income — along with accompanying taxes in a particular year, he noted. The donor-advised fund can help advisors and their clients offset those gains.

“If you have a windfall, you can immediately say, ‘Hey, put that money, put some of those assets into a donor-advised fund and take your time evaluating organizations and thinking about who you want to give that money to,” Nash said. “Maybe you can put aside money that’s good enough to support your giving, not just for one year, five years, 10 years — build a real legacy for you and your family or for your business. And so this is the most common reason that advisors fall in love with donor-advised funds.”

Regular gifts of assets to donor-advised funds at any time can bring a bigger tax advantage than donating cash, and the structure enables advisors and their clients to send stocks, ETFs or even digital holdings like cryptocurrency to organizations that may not have the capacity to receive non-cash contributions directly.

“Let’s say they give $30,000 to charity every year,” Nash said. “If you can just tell them, instead of taking that cash and giving it to the charity, to actually put the stock in a donor-advised fund, get those tax benefits, then they can give that cash to those charities, the same as they always did, but save money on taxes. And here’s the kicker, for people who care about this stuff, there is no wash-sale rule with donations, right? You can donate the shares out of their account to the donor-advised fund that had the lowest cost basis and then, literally, a millisecond later, you can take the cash that they would have given to charity and use it instead to replenish their investment account with higher cost-basis shares. So you permanently eliminate that tax liability.”

READ MORE: You’re doing it wrong: Annual portfolio rebalancing isn’t enough

Portfolio rebalancing may also present some “unforgiving” numbers when it comes to the “tax draft” of selling off one category of assets that took on unexpectedly high values in order to buy more investments in a lower-valued type of security, Nash pointed out.

“What if, instead of selling those appreciated shares, you actually donate some of those shares to a donor-advised fund, and then you use the cash that you would have used to rebalance the portfolio to buy up the underrepresented asset in the portfolio,” he said. “So you’re just moving the same amount of money around, but by having a donor-advised fund to capture that tax benefit of those appreciated securities, you just eliminate that liability.”

Advisors and their clients can choose among many donor-advised fund providers that are operating in the space, but Nash’s firm is making its pitch based on newer technology tools, the capacity for clients to add other family members and advisors to their accounts and flat-fee price points between $3 and $20 a month. 

Its name, Daffy, stands for “donor-advised funds for you,” Nash noted. Last year, the firm launched a tool for matching campaigns, such as one that Nash shared with Future Proof attendees in which a widower started a fund in honor of his late wife.      

“It’s very personal, and the organizer, the person running the campaign, can pick up to six charities to support and let their donors pick amongst them, and then the matching just automatically happens within minutes every time someone makes a donation in a campaign,” Nash said. “They’re not just giving to the organization. They’re supporting the organization, and they bring new people into the community — which is what the charities really want, is more and more exposure to people who care about their cause.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending