Connect with us

Accounting

FASB takes on crypto asset transfers

Published

on

The Financial Accounting Standards Board decided during a meeting Wednesday to add a project to its technical agenda related to the accounting for cryptocurrency asset transfers.

The project will include expanding the scope of an existing standard from 2023 on crypto assets to address wrapped tokens and receipt tokens, as well as clarifying the derecognition guidance for crypto transfer arrangements to assess whether the control of a crypto asset has been transferred. 

During a meeting last month, FASB decided to add to its technical agenda a project on the classification of certain digital assets as cash equivalents and recently added a project on accounting for transfers of crypto assets (including wrapped tokens and receipt tokens). As a result, FASB has now removed the digital assets project from its research agenda, according to a summary of board decisions

Stakeholder feedback received on other financial reporting areas for digital assets will be considered by FASB as part of its agenda consultation or agenda request processes.

In January, FASB’s staff issued an invitation to comment on its future standard-setting agenda and added a project on digital assets to its research agenda. Some of its stakeholders commented on the differences in practice for crypto lending and other transfers of crypto assets. Many of them identified crypto assets as a top priority and commended FASB for issuing the 2023 standard, known as of Subtopic 350-60, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Crypto Assets, noting that those amendments reduced costs for preparers and increased the decision usefulness of the financial statements for users, according to a handout at the meeting.

However, many stakeholders pointed out that there are several unresolved accounting challenges that continue to create diversity in practice and result in financial statements that don’t reflect the economics of crypto assets. Some of them noted that wrapped tokens and receipt tokens have increased in prevalence since the the 2023 accounting standards update and play a central role in the crypto asset ecosystem by bridging between blockchain protocols, facilitating decentralized finance transactions, and providing liquidity for staked crypto assets, among other use cases. However, they noted that wrapped tokens and receipt tokens are excluded from the scope of the standard and complained that the narrow scope of the standard has created a two-class system of accounting for assets with the same underlying economic characteristics and could result in artificial gains that are not decision useful for the user of the financial statements. “The two-class system of accounting also increases operability complexity and creates inconsistency in accounting outcomes,” said the handout. 

Therefore, they suggested that FASB expand the scope to include crypto assets that provide rights to other crypto assets that are otherwise within the scope of Subtopic 350-60. They noted that this change would reduce the cost and complexity of applying different measurement models, best reflect the economic effect of an entity’s crypto asset holdings in the entity’s financial position and performance, and result in better financial reporting and greater consistency in practice. Many of them pointed to an increasing prevalence of transactions in which the transferor of a crypto asset retains a contractual right to reclaim the asset from the transferee, either after a fixed period or on demand. Examples of those transactions are crypto assets staking, wrapping, lending, and liquidity pool participation. They said they often see entities applying a variety of guidance and nonauthoritative sources to account for those transactions.

“I do want to be careful, though, because there’s an infinite number of transactions that can occur in this space, and I’m a little concerned that if we get too targeted, we’re going to be opening on every single business model out there, and I don’t think that’s what we should do,” said FASB chair Richard Jones during the meeting. “I think in general people know how to do the accounting here, and I think they’ve highlighted a few areas where we can bring some clarity. But I do want to be careful that we don’t get effectively wrapped up into every business model. Some of these transactions, I don’t think there’s really a transfer to a counterparty. I think there’s simply an overlay of another item, so if we’re careful with the way we write the scope, it doesn’t mean they’re out of the scope of fair value accounting, but I don’t want to start opining on whether that’s a transfer or not.” 

The International Accounting Standards Board is also considering the possibility of adding a project to its agenda on crypto assets and discussed it during a meeting this week. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending