Economics
Fed close to pulling off the elusive economic soft landing in 2024 after great September jobs report
A hiring sign is posted on the exterior of Urban Outfitters at the Tysons Corner Center mall on August 22, 2024 in Tysons, Virginia.
Anna Rose Layden | Getty Images
September’s outsized payrolls boost takes the U.S. economy out of the shadows of recession and gives the Federal Reserve a fairly open glide path to a soft landing.
If that sounds like a Goldilocks scenario, it’s probably not far from it, even with the lingering inflation concerns that are straining consumers’ wallets.
A gravity-defying jobs market, at least a slowing pace of price increases and declining interest rates puts the macro picture in a pretty good place right now — a critical time from a policy and political standpoint.
“We’ve been expecting a soft landing. This just gives us more confidence that it seems to remain in place,” Beth Ann Bovino, chief economist at U.S. Bank, said after Friday’s nonfarm payrolls report. “It also increases the possibility of a no-landing as well, meaning even stronger economic data for 2025 than we currently expect.”
The jobs count certainly was better than virtually anyone figured, with companies and the government combining to boost payrolls by 254,000, blowing away the Dow Jones consensus for 150,000. It was a big step up even from August’s upwardly revised numbers and reversed a trend that started in April of decelerating job numbers and rising concern for a broader slowdown — or worse.
Beyond that, it virtually eliminated any chance that the Federal Reserve would be repeating its half percentage point interest rate cut from September anytime soon.
In fact, futures markets reversed positioning after the report, pricing in a near-certain probability of just a quarter-point move at the November Fed meeting, followed by another quarter point in December, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch gauge. Prior, markets had been looking for a half-point in December followed by the equivalent of quarter-point cuts at each of the eight Federal Open Market Committee meetings in 2025.
Not a perfect picture
No more, though, as the Fed, barring any more disappointments from the labor market, can stake a moderate pace through its easing cycle.
“If we continue to see a stronger than expected economy that may give the Fed reasons to slow the pace of rate cuts through 2025 with that exit rate being a little bit higher than they currently expect, all with the economy still maintaining its strength,” Bovino said. “That would be good news for both the Fed and the economy.”
To be sure, there remain some blemishes in the jobs picture.
More than 60% of the growth for September came from the usual suspects — food and drinking establishments, health care and government — that have all been the beneficiaries of fiscal largesse that has pushed the 2024 budget deficit to the brink of $2 trillion.
There also were a few technical factors with the report, such as a low response rate from survey participants, that could cast some clouds over Friday’s sunny report and lead to downward revisions in subsequent months.
But broadly speaking, the news was very good and raised questions over just how aggressive the Fed will need to be.
Questions for the Fed
Bank of America economists, for instance, asked “Did the Fed panic?” in a client note referencing the half percentage point, or 50 basis point, cut in September, while others wondered about the wild vacillations and miscalculations among Wall Street experts. David Royal, chief financial and investment officer at financial services firm Thrivent, speculated that “it is doubtful” the Fed would have cut by so much “if it had known this report would be so strong.”
“The question becomes, how does everybody keep getting it wrong?” said Kathy Jones, chief fixed income strategist at Charles Schwab. “How is it we can’t get this number right with all the information we get?”
Jones said the Fed will have a dilemma on its hand as it figures out the proper policy response. The FOMC next meets Nov. 6-7, right after the U.S. presidential election and following a five-week span during which it will get plenty more to digest.
Some commentary after the meeting suggested the Fed may have to raise its estimate of the “neutral” rate of interest that neither boosts nor restricts growth, an indication that benchmark interest rates will settle at a higher place than they have in the recent past.
“What does the Fed do with this? Certainly, 50 basis points is off the table for the next meeting. I don’t think there’s any case to be made there,” Jones said. “Do they pause? Do they do another 25 [basis points] because they’re still far from neutral? Do they just weigh this against other data that might not be as strong? I think they have a lot of figuring out to do.”
In the meantime, though, officials are likely to be content knowing that the economy is stable, the labor market isn’t in nearly as much trouble as had been suspected, and they have time to weigh their next move.
“We’ve witnessed a pretty remarkable economy over the past few years, despite some naysayers and lackluster consumer sentiment,” said Elizabeth Renter, senior economist at NerdWallet. “In an election year, passions run high and every economic report or event can garner intense reaction. But the economic aggregates tell us the U.S. economy has been and is strong.”
Inflation barely budged in April as tariffs President Donald Trump implemented in the early part of the month had yet to show up in consumer prices, the Commerce Department reported Friday.
The personal consumption expenditures price index, the Federal Reserve’s key inflation measure, increased just 0.1% for the month, putting the annual inflation rate at 2.1%. The monthly reading was in line with the Dow Jones consensus forecast while the annual level was 0.1 percentage point lower.
Excluding food and energy, the core reading that tends to get even greater focus from Fed policymakers showed readings of 0.1% and 2.5%, against respective estimates of 0.1% and 2.6%.
Consumer spending, though, slowed sharply for the month, posting just a 0.2% increase, in line with the consensus but slower than the 0.7% rate in March. A more cautious consumer mood also was reflected in the personal savings rate, which jumped to 4.9%, up from 0.6 percentage point in March to the highest level in nearly a year.
Personal income surged 0.8%, a slight increase from the prior month but well ahead of the forecast for 0.3%.
Markets showed little reaction to the news, with stock futures continuing to point lower and Treasury yields mixed.
People shop at a grocery store in Brooklyn on May 13, 2025 in New York City.
Spencer Platt | Getty Images
Trump has been pushing the Fed to lower its key interest rate as inflation has continued to gravitate back to the central bank’s 2% target. However, policymakers have been hesitant to move as they await the longer-term impacts of the president’s trade policy.
On Thursday, Trump and Fed Chair Jerome Powell held their first face-to-face meeting since the president started his second term. However, a Fed statement indicated the future path of monetary policy was not discussed and stressed that decisions would be made free of political considerations.
Trump slapped across-the-board 10% duties on all U.S. imports, part of an effort to even out a trading landscape in which the U.S. ran a record $140.5 billion deficit in March. In addition to the general tariffs, Trump launched selective reciprocal tariffs much higher than the 10% general charge.
Since then, though, Trump has backed off the more severe tariffs in favor of a 90-day negotiating period with the affected countries. Earlier this week, an international court struck down the tariffs, saying Trump exceeded his authority and didn’t prove that national security was threatened by the trade issues.
Then in the latest installment of the drama, an appeals court allowed a White House effort for a temporary stay of the order from the U.S. Court of International Trade.
Economists worry that tariffs could spark another round of inflation, though the historical record shows that their impact is often minimal.
At their policy meeting earlier this month, Fed officials also expressed worry about potential tariff inflation, particularly at a time when concerns are rising about the labor market. Higher prices and slower economic growth can yield stagflation, a phenomenon the U.S. hasn’t seen since the early 1980s.
AICPA wants Congress to change tax bill
Why the president must not be lexicographer-in-chief
On the move: HHM promotes former intern to partner
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
The Essential Practice of Bank and Credit Card Statement Reconciliation
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
-
Accounting1 week agoHouse tax bill includes provision eliminating PCAOB
-
Economics1 week agoWhat happens if the Inflation Reduction Act goes away?
-
Personal Finance1 week agoWhat House Republican ‘big beautiful’ budget bill means for your money
-
Accounting1 week agoTrump tax bill faces Senate’s arcane rules, desire for changes
-
Finance1 week agoPersonal finance app Monarch raises $75 million
-
Economics1 week agoHow much worse could America’s measles outbreak get?
-
Economics1 week agoA court resurrects the United States Institute of Peace
-
Economics1 week agoCalifornia has got really good at building giant batteries