Connect with us

Accounting

First-time penalty abatement will soon be automatic

Published

on

The IRS’s First-Time Abatement program is a key penalty relief tool for taxpayers with a clean compliance history. For tax professionals, it offers the most direct way to resolve failure-to-file, failure-to-pay and failure-to-deposit penalties for otherwise compliant clients. 

At a recent AICPA tax conference, Erin Collins, National Taxpayer Advocate at the IRS, stated that beginning in 2026, the IRS will automatically apply First-Time Abatement to all qualifying taxpayers. Once fully implemented, this shift eases administrative burdens and lets practitioners address more complex matters. 

Understanding the authority, eligibility criteria and automation advantages will be essential for firms representing clients before the IRS.

Background and authority

The First Time Abatement program was introduced in 2001 as part of the IRS’s broader effort to promote voluntary compliance. The authority derives from the Internal Revenue Manual, principally IRM 20.1.1.3.6.1, which provides an administrative waiver for taxpayers with a good filing and payment history. It is not based on statute; it is a discretionary administrative practice used by the IRS to incentivize compliant behavior and assist taxpayers who have otherwise maintained good compliance but make an isolated mistake.

The program was designed to decrease the volume of penalty appeals and to acknowledge that compliant taxpayers sometimes miss a filing or payment deadline. The IRS’s goal was to expedite such cases, without requiring taxpayers to assert reasonable cause or go through extended correspondence cycles.

Penalties eligible for First-Time Abatement

First Time Abatement applies to three common noncompliance penalties.

  • Failure to file on time;
  • Failure to pay on time; and
  • Failure to deposit payroll taxes on time.

These penalties often arise from simple oversight, cash flow problems or disruptions in a business’s administrative processes. Since they can quickly add up and, in some cases, outstrip the underlying tax liability, the availability of a simple abatement process is particularly important to both individual and business taxpayers.

“Understanding that First Time Abatement has no dollar cap makes it particularly valuable when payroll tax deposits are missed,” notes Mary Lundstedt, partner at the law firm Hall Lundstedt. “A single quarter’s failure-to-deposit penalty can exceed the underlying tax liability, making this administrative waiver essential for business clients facing potential cash flow issues.”

Eligibility requirements

Although First Time Abatement is simple in concept, eligibility must be met exactly. There are three criteria considered by the IRS:

1. Filing compliance: The taxpayer must have filed the necessary returns for the last three years or have valid extensions on file. The IRS will not allow a First Time Abatement if the taxpayer has unfiled returns.

2. Compliance payment: All taxes due must be paid, or the taxpayer must be in an approved payment arrangement. An installment agreement is acceptable provided the taxpayer is current.

3. Clean penalty history: The taxpayer must not have had any penalties of the same type for the three previous tax years. The IRS interprets this rule very strictly. A penalty abated for reasonable cause is considered a prior penalty. A penalty abated under First Time Abatement is not considered a prior penalty.

When each of these conditions is satisfied, the IRS considers the taxpayer eligible.

Abatement requested

Historically, First Time Abatement was requested by calling the IRS Practitioner Priority Service, filing Form 843, or responding to a penalty notice. Many practitioners routinely ask the IRS to check for First Time Abatement before considering reasonable cause or other penalty relief options.

The IRS would check the compliance history, payment status and eligibility. If the taxpayer was qualified, the IRS granted approval for an abatement during the call or within a few weeks via correspondence. While this process was straightforward, it nevertheless involved both practitioner time and IRS resources. It also generated inconsistent results when IRS staff applied the rules unevenly.

Automatic abatement

IRS officials, including National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins, have announced that the agency will automatically grant the First Time Abatement whenever a taxpayer qualifies. The development shows improvements in IRS data systems and a broader trend toward automatic penalty reductions for compliant taxpayers.

When fully implemented, the automated waiver process should grant eligible taxpayers relief without requiring an application. This automation minimizes the need for calls, letters and follow-up inquiries, and reduces disputes over process, timing and eligibility.

Automatic application offers several benefits: it eliminates obstacles for taxpayers unaware of available relief, reduces the volume of calls to already overburdened IRS phone lines, minimizes errors from manual reviews, and ensures equal treatment for similarly situated taxpayers.

“While automation represents a significant advancement in penalty administration, practitioners should verify transcript entries carefully during the transition period,” advises Ashlee Hall, founding partner at Hall Lundstedt. “System limitations in the early stages could result in eligible penalties being overlooked, and proactive account review remains essential to protect client interests.”

Benefits for taxpayers and practitioners

First-time abatement has great value due to its predictability and simple administration compared to reasonable cause arguments. It does not need evidence, detailed narratives or proof of facts. It is entirely based on compliance history and status when requested.

Taxpayer benefits include:

1. Reduced financial burden: These penalties can be substantial. Avoiding these penalties creates cash stability for the taxpayer, particularly when the penalty exceeds the underlying tax.

2. Faster resolution: Clients and firms avoid lengthy correspondence cycles and multi-month delays.

3. Recognition of prior compliance: Taxpayers with a long record of timely compliance receive practical acknowledgement of this behavior.

This is a significant change, as taxpayers will receive relief automatically. In firms, automation enables staff to focus on higher-value advisory work. Rather than spending time on penalty calls, teams will concentrate on planning, representation, and resolving substantive issues.

Issues in practice management

First-time abatement review should be added to tax professionals’ standard penalty intake procedures. Even with automatic approval, firms should continue to review account transcripts to confirm the application and identify any penalties that were not removed as anticipated. Firms should also educate clients on the importance of maintaining a clean compliance history. A single failure-to-file penalty in the lookback period will eliminate eligibility for three years.

First Time Abatement remains one of the IRS’s most effective administrative relief programs. It delivers predictable, rule-driven relief for compliant taxpayers and reduces unnecessary administrative burden for both practitioners and the IRS. As the IRS adopts automated approval, tax professionals will experience fewer penalty disputes and swifter resolutions for eligible clients.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending