Connect with us

Accounting

Fraudsters file false 941 returns to steal tax refunds

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service didn’t do enough to verify the identity of callers to its Practitioner Priority Service and Business Specialty Tax telephone lines, allowing the unauthorized disclosure of tax information, the fraudulent filing of Forms 941, and the issuance of fraudulent tax refund checks, according to a new report.

The report, released Friday by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, came in response to a referral from TIGTA’s Office of Investigations about a scheme involving the filing of false Forms 941, the tax return that’s filed on a quarterly basis by businesses. TIGTA assessed the policies and procedures that the IRS has implemented to stop fraudsters from using this scheme to file fraudulent Forms 941 claiming a tax refund and found that authenticating callers’ identity on business and Practitioner Priority Service phone lines needs to be strengthened to combat fraud.

“If the IRS does not properly authenticate individuals before providing tax account information, there is a continued risk of unscrupulous individuals taking advantage of the tax system,” said the report. “The federal government is also at risk of losing funds.”

Last October, TIGTA alerted the IRS to a scheme involving more than $93 million in fraudulent refunds issued to 20 different businesses. Most of the payments were stopped, but at least $2.7 million was paid to the criminals. Upon doing further analysis, TIGTA found 150 unique Employer Identification Numbers that were issued $55.6 million in refund checks between January 2023 and July 2024.

IRS employees alerted officials about the risk of erroneous refunds being issued based on the fraudulent Form 941 filings, but management at the agency didn’t take action to prevent the scheme. IRS representatives in the Customer Account Services function raised the issue in June and August 2024.

TIGTA found the IRS has guidance in place to ensure IRS representatives are aware of possible fraudulent activity on a  tax account, including a tool that alerts them when identity theft is suspected or documented. If identity theft is an issue on a tax account, IRS employees are required to do additional research, including reviewing history notes on the account, TIGTA noted. 

“Our review of the history notes showed that IRS employees had documented fraudsters’ initial requests for tax information,” said the report. “If subsequent IRS employees had reviewed those notes, they may not have provided the information needed to further the fraud scheme.”

Last October, TIGTA reported an impersonation scheme that involved fraudsters calling the Practitioner Priority Service telephone line, which is used by tax professionals. Some of the report is redacted when discussing exactly what the fraudsters did, but as a result of TIGTA’s review, IRS management implemented additional authentication controls. IRS representatives answering calls on the Practitioner Priority Service telephone line received access to the Secure Access Digital Identity dashboard to help them verify the identity of the person on the telephone before any tax return transcripts are released.

TIGTA recommended the IRS should educate representatives about the fraud scheme and require them to properly authenticate callers before providing tax account information, including tax deposit and tax transcript information. IRS management agreed with TIGTA’s recommendation and took corrective action.

“The protection of taxpayer information and prevention of fraudulent refunds are top priorities at the IRS,” wrote Kenneth Corbin, chief of the Taxpayer Services division at the IRS, in response to the report. “We regularly review our electronic filing systems and recognize the critical need for accuracy and efficiency during form processing and record retrieval, while maintaining database integrity.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending