Connect with us

Accounting

GENIUS Act sets up framework for stablecoin

Published

on

President Trump signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act into law last month, creating a regulatory framework for stablecoins, a form of cryptocurrency pegged to fiat currency like the U.S. dollar or to short-term U.S. Treasuries.

Under the law, stablecoin issuers would be required to establish and disclose stablecoin redemption procedures and to issue periodic reports of outstanding stablecoins and reserve composition, which would be certified by executives and “examined” by registered public accounting firms. Issuers with more than $50 billion in stablecoins outstanding would be required to submit audited annual financial statements. They would be prohibited from paying interest to stablecoin holders.

“It’s a pretty big deal,” said Deloitte tax leader Rob Massey. “The GENIUS Act encompasses a lot of the regulatory questions, but it doesn’t address tax. It just emphasizes the fact that, with the passage of the Act and enabling of regulated stablecoins, for tax purposes, it’s property. It’s not issued by a central bank. We have private issuers. It’s not currency, and so from a tax perspective, that brings unique considerations when you’re anticipating high volumes of commercial transactions using something other than currency.”

That means the longstanding IRS guidance applies, treating cryptocurrency as property rather than as currency, as well as more recent crypto regulations that were issued last year.

“Our job then is to figure out what kind of property is it? That’s question one,” said Massey. “Not all stablecoins are created equal. And then, once you determine the type of property it is, then you look to the transaction, and what are the tax implications of using property in a commercial transaction, which could span many different areas. We think about revenue recognition, we think about sourcing. We think about informational reporting.”

He noted that some of those matters were clarified by the Treasury regulations that were published last summer on information reporting and the determination of the amount realized and basis for certain digital asset sales and exchanges are subject to reporting a transaction on a Form 1089-DA. Sections 6041 and 6045 of the Tax Code govern such transactions.

“When you get into information reporting, if you just take it category by category, one of the complexities is when you have withholding taxes,” said Massey. “If you were to have withholding taxes because you made a cross-border payment or you used it for payroll tax, and the payor withholds stables — if you’re using stablecoins in that transaction, and you withhold stablecoins — the federal government doesn’t take stablecoins at this time. If you’re the payor and the withholding agent, you’re then bound by keeping the stablecoins and remitting cash. You have the conversion, and you may be in the middle of yet another transaction between stables and fiat so that you can remit the fiat to the government.”

He noted that there was broad support by both chambers of Congress for the GENIUS Act. “When you listen to the policymakers discuss the implications of the bill, they seem to really grasp a lot of the fundamental implications, not just promoting the dollar, but there’s a lot of healthy dialogue,” he said.

The rules can be affected by revenue recognition considerations as well. “Anytime you’re dealing with a transaction that uses property instead of currency, then you have to take a look at what are the general rules and concepts that apply,” said Massey. “Think through whether or not you have a difference with regard to revenue recognition or taking a deduction. That’s a big one.”

He cited the information reporting requirements under both Sections 6045 and 6041 of the Tax Code.

“There could be unique nuances to sales tax,” he said. “There could be nuances to when you’re going through a multinational and you have stablecoins in your international subsidiaries. Does that change your GILTI [Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income] calculation and the mix of assets that is required. I’d say the overall implications on your GILTI analysis compared to Subpart F is a big deal. You’re now dealing in funds that may not run through a bank, so when you’re reconciling the supporting documentation for an exam, documenting your support for expenditures, you may not have bank records to come back to. You may have other sources of data that you may need to gather along the journey that could be asked about under exam. That’s a whole different muscle that people need to develop when they’re using stables as well as crypto.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending