Connect with us

Accounting

Green energy tax incentives in doubt under Trump

Published

on

The Trump administration has been rapidly backing away from the various green energy incentives offered under the Biden administration, starting with a pair of executive actions that President Trump signed on the day of his inauguration, and continuing through sweeping deregulatory changes announced by the Environmental Protection Agency this week.

Trump signed the Unleashing American Energy executive order on his first day in office, ordering federal agencies to pause all disbursements under the Inflation Reduction Act and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. That same day, he signed another executive order, Regulatory Freeze Pending Review, suspending the development of new regulations and preventing the publication of any pending regulations until they are reviewed for compliance with the new administration’s energy policy.

Since that time, the Senate confirmed former New York Republican congressman Lee Zeldin in January as EPA administrator, and on Wednesday he announced what he called “the greatest day of deregulation our nation has seen,” saying he was “driving a dagger straight into the heart of the climate change religion” while rolling back trillions in regulatory costs and “hidden taxes.”

However, tax professionals are wondering about what is going to happen with all the various tax incentives their clients had counted on from the Inflation Reduction Act and other sources.

“Obviously we anticipated different energy policy goals under this incoming administration than we had under the Biden administration, so we’ve been bracing to see what happens,” said Jess LeDonne, director of tax technical, policy and legislative affairs at the Bonadio Group in Rochester, New York, during an interview in late February. “And this executive order is certainly a signal of what to expect going forward, but I would say we’re still in a little bit of a wait and see [period], because this executive order is really just a pause right now on the disbursement of funds under the Inflation Reduction Act and also the bipartisan infrastructure law as well.”

She noted that one of the executive orders directs the agency to pause disbursement of funds under those laws for 90 days, and in those 90 days to create a report and submit a report to the White House Budget Office, essentially demonstrating that the spending aligns with the new administration’s energy policies. 

“In this 90-day hold period, there’s no disbursements of funds under those laws,” said LeDonne. “What this means long term right now is just a pause. Those laws are still the law. The Inflation Reduction Act has not been repealed. That would require either congressional action or judicial action stating that the law is unconstitutional. That law cannot be undone by executive order.”

However, this is still creating uncertainty for clients who have invested in green energy sources at their businesses and homes.

“What we are seeing with our clients is certainly uncertainty around what this means, if this is an indication of a broader intention under the new administration to roll back green energy incentives,” said LeDonne. “There is objective uncertainty for them for long-term planning.”

Some clients have already embarked on projects and are wondering whether they will be able to claim the tax benefits they were promised under the Biden administration.

“We certainly have clients who have already completed projects,” said LeDonne. “We have clients who have projects underway. There’s all different points in this life cycle, and if and when anything does change other than this pause, my first question will be, what’s the effective date of that change? If something does happen congressionally that would undo these incentives, when does that change take effect? Is it 60 days after that law passes? Are they going to try to go retroactive to the beginning of this year? We have conversations with our clients about when they invested in these projects, when the projects went online, what those dates are, so that we can monitor the legislation and see if any changes actually impact that.”

The biggest uncertainty for clients right now is longer-term planning. “If you’re maybe a developer or someone in the construction industry, and part of the project is planning for a geothermal or solar energy offset for the project cost, that’s where right now there’s maybe a hesitation, given these changes under the new administration, that might give pause to spending that money,” said LeDonne. “In the past, you may have been able to more confidently rely on some investment offset from the government.” 

Clients are unsure if they will be able to recoup the costs they have invested in green energy projects, even though the political lines aren’t always so clear, as many Republican-leaning states also have large-scale projects underway. Around 80% of the manufacturing investments from the Inflation Reduction Act are in Republican congressional districts, according to The New York Times.

“It’s tempting to think about these green energy incentives as a really partisan issue down party lines, and I would say it’s really not that clean because there are certainly Republican lawmakers and Republican states and Republican districts that utilize Inflation Reduction Act incentives very heavily,” said LeDonne. “There are some Republican lawmakers that have constituents that utilize these programs, and therefore maintaining these green energy incentives is actually a really important policy for a lot of Republican lawmakers.”

Much will depend on the timing. “It really depends on a client’s fiscal year when they’re filing, when the project took place,” said LeDonne. “But for right now, if money has been spent under the law as it currently stands, if there’s eligible spend that can be offset by tax credits, we’ll certainly help our clients claim those. If something were to change retroactively, there may be the need to amend.” 

She pointed out that even if the federal tax incentives for green energy are repealed, many states will still offer them. “It’s not that all of this money is going away and there’s not going to be any green energy incentives,” said LeDonne. “We’d certainly look to the state and other potential funding mechanisms too. We’ll keep an eye on it. But right now, there is some uncertainty. Short term, all we have right now is this pause, the 90 days, and that will be up on April 20. Thereafter, we’ll see what happens, based on the agency reports around this funding, and thereafter what occurs.”

The Inflation Reduction Act and the infrastructure law nevertheless remain in place, even if they’re amended at some point or if the Trump administration keeps refusing to pay the disbursements. 

“It is important to know that right now this is a pause. Those laws are still the laws, and those credits still exist,” said LeDonne. “It’s simply that right now they cannot be paid out. Of course, paying out federal incentives, funding anything, is not something that happens quickly anyway. Right now, this pause might not directly really impact too many people, but we’re certainly monitoring to see if this is the canary in the coalmine, so to speak, that’s really indicating a broader intention by the new administration to undo some of these green energy incentives.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending