Connect with us

Accounting

Green energy tax incentives in doubt under Trump

Published

on

The Trump administration has been rapidly backing away from the various green energy incentives offered under the Biden administration, starting with a pair of executive actions that President Trump signed on the day of his inauguration, and continuing through sweeping deregulatory changes announced by the Environmental Protection Agency this week.

Trump signed the Unleashing American Energy executive order on his first day in office, ordering federal agencies to pause all disbursements under the Inflation Reduction Act and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. That same day, he signed another executive order, Regulatory Freeze Pending Review, suspending the development of new regulations and preventing the publication of any pending regulations until they are reviewed for compliance with the new administration’s energy policy.

Since that time, the Senate confirmed former New York Republican congressman Lee Zeldin in January as EPA administrator, and on Wednesday he announced what he called “the greatest day of deregulation our nation has seen,” saying he was “driving a dagger straight into the heart of the climate change religion” while rolling back trillions in regulatory costs and “hidden taxes.”

However, tax professionals are wondering about what is going to happen with all the various tax incentives their clients had counted on from the Inflation Reduction Act and other sources.

“Obviously we anticipated different energy policy goals under this incoming administration than we had under the Biden administration, so we’ve been bracing to see what happens,” said Jess LeDonne, director of tax technical, policy and legislative affairs at the Bonadio Group in Rochester, New York, during an interview in late February. “And this executive order is certainly a signal of what to expect going forward, but I would say we’re still in a little bit of a wait and see [period], because this executive order is really just a pause right now on the disbursement of funds under the Inflation Reduction Act and also the bipartisan infrastructure law as well.”

She noted that one of the executive orders directs the agency to pause disbursement of funds under those laws for 90 days, and in those 90 days to create a report and submit a report to the White House Budget Office, essentially demonstrating that the spending aligns with the new administration’s energy policies. 

“In this 90-day hold period, there’s no disbursements of funds under those laws,” said LeDonne. “What this means long term right now is just a pause. Those laws are still the law. The Inflation Reduction Act has not been repealed. That would require either congressional action or judicial action stating that the law is unconstitutional. That law cannot be undone by executive order.”

However, this is still creating uncertainty for clients who have invested in green energy sources at their businesses and homes.

“What we are seeing with our clients is certainly uncertainty around what this means, if this is an indication of a broader intention under the new administration to roll back green energy incentives,” said LeDonne. “There is objective uncertainty for them for long-term planning.”

Some clients have already embarked on projects and are wondering whether they will be able to claim the tax benefits they were promised under the Biden administration.

“We certainly have clients who have already completed projects,” said LeDonne. “We have clients who have projects underway. There’s all different points in this life cycle, and if and when anything does change other than this pause, my first question will be, what’s the effective date of that change? If something does happen congressionally that would undo these incentives, when does that change take effect? Is it 60 days after that law passes? Are they going to try to go retroactive to the beginning of this year? We have conversations with our clients about when they invested in these projects, when the projects went online, what those dates are, so that we can monitor the legislation and see if any changes actually impact that.”

The biggest uncertainty for clients right now is longer-term planning. “If you’re maybe a developer or someone in the construction industry, and part of the project is planning for a geothermal or solar energy offset for the project cost, that’s where right now there’s maybe a hesitation, given these changes under the new administration, that might give pause to spending that money,” said LeDonne. “In the past, you may have been able to more confidently rely on some investment offset from the government.” 

Clients are unsure if they will be able to recoup the costs they have invested in green energy projects, even though the political lines aren’t always so clear, as many Republican-leaning states also have large-scale projects underway. Around 80% of the manufacturing investments from the Inflation Reduction Act are in Republican congressional districts, according to The New York Times.

“It’s tempting to think about these green energy incentives as a really partisan issue down party lines, and I would say it’s really not that clean because there are certainly Republican lawmakers and Republican states and Republican districts that utilize Inflation Reduction Act incentives very heavily,” said LeDonne. “There are some Republican lawmakers that have constituents that utilize these programs, and therefore maintaining these green energy incentives is actually a really important policy for a lot of Republican lawmakers.”

Much will depend on the timing. “It really depends on a client’s fiscal year when they’re filing, when the project took place,” said LeDonne. “But for right now, if money has been spent under the law as it currently stands, if there’s eligible spend that can be offset by tax credits, we’ll certainly help our clients claim those. If something were to change retroactively, there may be the need to amend.” 

She pointed out that even if the federal tax incentives for green energy are repealed, many states will still offer them. “It’s not that all of this money is going away and there’s not going to be any green energy incentives,” said LeDonne. “We’d certainly look to the state and other potential funding mechanisms too. We’ll keep an eye on it. But right now, there is some uncertainty. Short term, all we have right now is this pause, the 90 days, and that will be up on April 20. Thereafter, we’ll see what happens, based on the agency reports around this funding, and thereafter what occurs.”

The Inflation Reduction Act and the infrastructure law nevertheless remain in place, even if they’re amended at some point or if the Trump administration keeps refusing to pay the disbursements. 

“It is important to know that right now this is a pause. Those laws are still the laws, and those credits still exist,” said LeDonne. “It’s simply that right now they cannot be paid out. Of course, paying out federal incentives, funding anything, is not something that happens quickly anyway. Right now, this pause might not directly really impact too many people, but we’re certainly monitoring to see if this is the canary in the coalmine, so to speak, that’s really indicating a broader intention by the new administration to undo some of these green energy incentives.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending