Connect with us

Accounting

Guiding clients through property tax turbulence

Published

on

There has recently been an increasing pushback on property taxes across the country. In November 2024, multiple states including Arizona, Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Virginia and Wyoming had ballot initiatives passed designed to lower property taxes. Now, Florida lawmakers have taken it one step further by proposing to eliminate property taxes altogether. This begs the question if this is feasible, and if so, how would states generate revenue without property tax revenue? 

Over the last few years, property values have skyrocketed. With property taxes tied to a building’s value, this increase has caused a similar increase in property tax assessments. Lawmakers have felt pushback from constituents who are upset about the tax increase on real estate properties. This often leads to increased homestead exemptions, such as Florida’s recent changes, or exemptions for disabled veterans, as occurred in Colorado, New Mexico and Virginia. Most of these exemptions or changes apply primarily to owner-occupied homes and rarely extend to business assets. 

North Dakota attempted to take this one step further. A ballot measure in North Dakota designed to eliminate property taxes failed after pushback over the spending cuts this would require. This scenario is similar to a measure attempted in 2012, which also failed; however, it is important to know that the 2024 ballot measure was much closer, with only 63.5% voting against, as opposed to 76.5% voting against it in 2012. The increased pushback on property taxes was especially notable when North Dakota Governor Kelly Armstrong unveiled a plan in January to eliminate property taxes for most homeowners within the upcoming decade. 

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis followed suit and is pushing for elimination of property taxes across the state. As a state without an income tax, this could be detrimental to state funding. Property taxes in Florida bring in approximately $50 billion annually, which offsets 50% to 60% of school funding, 18% of county revenue and 17% of municipal revenue. While eliminating the property tax burden sounds good in theory to citizens, making up the gaps in funding becomes an issue. One way to make up this funding deficit would be to increase the sales tax. Unfortunately, to make up the revenue difference, Florida’s sales tax would have to double to nearly 12%.   

Increasing sales taxes to offset property taxes can have negative effects. Sales taxes disproportionately affect lower-income earners as they spend a higher percentage of their income on goods and services than higher-income earners. Additionally, this could exacerbate inflationary pressures already felt across the country. Potentially more important to the government is that sales tax revenue tends to be less stable than property tax revenue. In economic downturns, sales tax revenue drops, leading to increasing instability for the state. 

Another option states should consider is continuing to increase homestead exemptions for homeowners, or look to eliminate property taxes for homeowners, similar to the proposals North Dakota’s governor proposed. One problem with this proposal is that it shifts the tax burden to businesses from individuals. This could be detrimental to states attempting to attract business investment. Shifting the burden of taxation solely to businesses could make owners question putting down roots in specific locations.

All considerations regarding how to change a state’s property tax revenue reveal how much of a burden it has become in recent years. Increasing costs of homes continues to lead to skyrocketing tax rates affecting homeowners, businesses and governments across the country. What is a business owner or their advisor to do in the meantime? The worst thing a business owner can do is to sit back and wait to see if the government will change its position on property tax. If the North Dakota example shows anything, it is that changing property tax structures is difficult and takes time.   

A first step business owners should consider is to question their property tax assessments. What many taxpayers do not realize is that their property tax assessment can — and in many cases should — be reviewed and appealed. With property taxes becoming a much higher burden on businesses and individuals, it’s a perfect time to look to determine if a property is accurately assessed. A qualified property tax consultant can look to determine if the property is accurately assessed or overassessed based on multiple factors. Questioning and appealing assessed values can allow building owners to gain control while waiting to see if local governments will change the way property taxes are levied.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending