Connect with us

Accounting

Helping tax and accounting clients pick the right business structure

Published

on

Clients who decide to make a “fresh start” after April 15 and launch their own business venture may seek guidance from their tax professional regarding the form or business structure they should choose. The tax pro’s response should be simple enough to be understandable without confusing the issues, and comprehensive enough to include potential snags or traps for the unwary.

Think of business structures as different vehicles that can get you to the same destination — business success — but with very different rides along the way, said Miklos Ringbauer, a CPA in Southern California. 

An LLC, or limited liability company, offers a favorable blend of flexibility and protection. It separates personal assets from business liabilities, while giving options on how the business owner is taxed. It’s the go-to choice for solopreneurs and business owners who want simplicity without sacrificing protection.

Choosing a business entity image

Marlon Lopez MMG1design/mmg1design – stock.adobe.com

S corporations function technically as corporations but with tax advantages flowing through to the personal returns of the owners. The owner can potentially slash their self-employment tax by paying themselves a reasonable salary plus distributions. There are restrictions, however: They are limited to 100 shareholders, all of whom must be U.S. citizens or residents, and there can be only one class of stock. 

C corporations are the corporate giants, existing as completely separate entities with their own tax rates. They can have unlimited shareholders of any nationality and multiple classes of stock. The drawback, of course, is double taxation, due to a tax on profits at the corporate level and again when distributed as dividends. 

Although there are numerous “do-it-yourself” websites and incorporation kits, Ringbauer does not recommend them for someone starting a new business. 

“There’s an incredible amount of information on the internet, but much of it is not suitable or is incomplete for a taxpayer when they decide to make a choice,” he said. “It is extremely valuable to speak with a professional — a trusted CPA tax advisor and a lawyer. I can’t tell you how often I’ve seen DIY-created entities from a novice who used an online platform. The system asked the user to check certain boxes, and the user doesn’t know whether that’s the right checkbox or a wrong addition to their bylaws or to their incorporation documents. … It’s very valuable to engage an attorney to do this upfront, because once you do the incorporation and order your bylaws, you might have to spend an incredible amount of financial resources upfront to fix it if it’s incorrect.”

“Most people are aware of LLCs, S corporations and C corporations,” he said. “One unique thing to know is that, except in a few restricted cases, it does not matter what entities you incorporate; you can elect to be taxed as a different type of structure. For example, you can create an LLC for state purposes, but as a taxpayer, you can choose to be taxed as a C corporation or as an S corporation on the federal level. With the projected tax law changes, it’s going to be very important.”

It’s important to discuss the projected lifecycle of the entity with the client and what the taxpayer intends to do. Do they envision selling it, passing it to their heirs, dissolving it or going public? The answer may determine potential tax strategies and timing. 

While California prohibits accountants from incorporating an entity, in other states a CPA can do so, according to Ringbauer. And in states like California, it’s important for an accountant to provide guidance as to which rules and filing requirements and everything else the new business venture will be subject to.

The requirement that an S corporation not have a foreign member can result in a disqualification in the event of a divorce where both spouses own shares, and one is a noncitizen, he noted. 

“If part of the shares will be given to the noncitizen spouse, in the old days that would automatically disqualify the entity from its S corporation status,” he explained. “But from 2017 on, the IRS made the rule change that the entity has the ability to correct that by having the noncitizen spouse sell their shares within a very short period of time in order for the entity not to lose its S status.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending