Connect with us

Accounting

House GOP bill would slash IRS funding

Published

on

House Republicans have introduced a spending resolution that would slash Internal Revenue Service funding by around $2.8 billion, threatening taxpayer service and enforcement.

The spending proposal would go beyond even the cuts proposed by the Trump administration. The fiscal year 2026 Financial Services and General Government appropriations bill was marked up Monday night by the House Appropriations Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee. 

“This 23% cut is more than the cut that the administration proposed, which was 20%,” said Rochelle Hodes, a principal in the Washington national tax office at Crowe, a Top 25 Firm based in Chicago. “That would bring the budget for the IRS to the lowest levels since 2002.”

The cuts for enforcement are about 45%, whereas the administration budget was going to cut it by about 30%, she noted. 

“However, the House doesn’t act alone,” she added. “It’s got to go over to the Senate. I think the Senate’s got other fish to fry. The Senate has been generally in the camp of keeping IRS at consistent funding, not higher, not lower.”

She noted that during the negotiations over the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the Senate Republican version diverged considerably from the House GOP version, and ultimately the Senate version was the one that passed.

“The Senate has their own ideas, and they really don’t feel constrained by what the House puts forward, so they’re going to go their own route,” said Hodes.

Other administrative proposals in the bill would prohibit the IRS from targeting individuals or groups for exercising their First Amendment rights or ideological beliefs, and prohibit the IRS from using funds to develop a free electronic return-filing service option like its Direct File system without prior congressional approval. The bill also threatens to withhold funds from the Financial Accounting Standards Board unless it withdraws its income tax disclosure standard.

The Trump administration has already eliminated over 25% of its workforce this year through layoffs, retirements, voluntary buyouts through two Deferred Resignation Programs, and reductions in force that are expected to accelerate after a recent Supreme Court ruling.

On Tuesday, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration issued a report providing an update on IRS workforce reductions, showing how the agency went from 103,000 employees in January to approximately 77,000 in May 2025.

“According to IRS records, 25,386 employees separated, took a DRP offer, or used some other incentive to leave,” said the report. “Another 294 employees were sent termination notices due to RIF actions.”

Certain business units and positions were impacted more than others. Approximately 27% of tax examiners were separated from the IRS, while 26% of revenue agents separated. “Tax examiners are responsible for reviewing and processing federal tax returns to ensure compliance and accuracy,” the report explained. “Revenue agents conduct examinations (audits) by reviewing financial records of individuals and businesses to verify what is reported.”

Hodes is concerned about what might happen with the cutbacks in areas like the Taxpayer Advocate Service. She has clients who are anticipating large tax refunds and are waiting to hear back from TAS. 

“I’m concerned that when I try to go to the IRS, the folks that I need at the IRS to actually do the operation aren’t going to be there,” said Hodes. “This is before budget cuts, and we’re already seeing significant slowdowns.”

The National Treasury Employees Union is also concerned about the budget cuts. It noted that by recommending that the IRS receive $853 million less for taxpayer services than the president requested, the IRS would have fewer employees available to answer calls from individuals and businesses, endangering the public’s faith in the tax system and depriving taxpayers of the services they deserve

“Customer service representatives are an incredibly vital piece of our tax system because they are on the front lines helping honest taxpayers meet their tax obligations and avoid errors,” said NTEU national president Doreen Greenwald in a statement Monday. “Slashing this part of the workforce is a disservice to the millions of Americans who contact the IRS every year for help.

The IRS’ own budget document says that without the $853 million investment, the level of service provided to telephone callers would “plummet” to 16% during the 2026 filing season, down from 87% in 2025. And instead of a 60% level of service for the full calendar year 2026, the cuts would drop service levels to 11%.

The appropriations bill would cut the agency’s regular funding by $2.7 billion in fiscal year 2026, but without the planned investments from the Inflation Reduction Act, the agency would have $9.9 billion less money to spend next year.

Hodes noted that taxpayers and tax professionals will need help with resolving questions about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and problems that have arisen along with the cutbacks.

“The IRS is sending erroneous penalty notices some taxpayers who had their due date for payment extended due to disasters,” she said. “People paid on time and filed on time because they got this extension, and then after they filed, they got a penalty notice for late payment. Now are they going to get it resolved? Sure, it’s an error, but still, I have to now go get somebody from customer service or from TAS who now has extra things on their plate.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending