Connect with us

Accounting

House unveils Trump-backed bill to avert government shutdown

Published

on

House Republicans announced a spending bill to keep government agencies open through Sept. 30, daring Democrats to vote against it and risk a disruptive March 15 shutdown.

The move tees up a dramatic confrontation on Capitol Hill next week and threatens to further fuel uncertainty for a federal workforce roiled by swift and aggressive cuts made by billionaire Elon Musk. 

Speaker Mike Johnson will attempt to hold the fractious Republican majority together and muscle the 99-page bill through the House on Tuesday, likely without help from Democrats. But the bill would still need the help of moderate Democrats in the Senate, where the legislation would stall without 60 votes. 

Neither party, however, has shown an appetite for a shutdown. If the bill fails in either chamber, Congress is likely to pass a temporary bill to buy additional time to forge a compromise that has eluded lawmakers since the fiscal year began in October.  

President Donald Trump called on Republican lawmakers to pass the bill next week, warning them to allow “NO DISSENT” in their ranks.  

“I am asking you all to give us a few months to get us through to September so we can continue to put the Country’s ‘financial house’ in order,” Trump said on his Truth Social network.

Democrats have tried to leverage the spending bill to put constraints on Musk and his so-called Department of Government Efficiency. Republicans, who hold the majority in both chambers, have resisted. The stopgap bill was crafted in consultation with the White House. 

The stopgap bill would allow the Trump administration “to continue the DOGE efforts finding all these extraordinary levels of savings, and waste, fraud and abuse,” Johnson told Fox News on Friday. “We’ll be able to incorporate that into the budgeting for FY 26 which will start almost immediately after we’re done next week.”

Representative Rosa DeLauro, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, said she opposed the bill because it would allow Musk to continue making cuts, overriding the will of Congress.

“By essentially closing the book on negotiations for full-year funding bills that help the middle class and protect our national security, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle have handed their power to an unelected billionaire,” she said in a statement.

The bill would slightly decrease overall discretionary spending through the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30. The bill, Trump signaled in remarks earlier this week, paves the way for his more sweeping legislative priorities: a proposed $4.5 trillion tax cut over the next decade paired with $2 trillion in spending cuts aimed at entitlement programs.

“Conservatives will love this Bill because it sets us up to cut Taxes and Spending in reconciliation, all while effectively FREEZING Spending this year,” Trump said on Truth Social Wednesday as the bill was being drafted. “Let’s get this Bill done.”

South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said on Fox News Sunday that while he didn’t want the government to shut down, the bill “is terrible on defense and the border. I want to commit what we’re going to have more money for border and defense before I vote for” it. 

The vote will test whether Johnson and Trump can wrangle GOP conservatives who have never voted for a stopgap funding measure. Conservative hard-liners have pledged to seek deep, permanent cuts to federal agencies in fiscal 2026 once Musk’s cost-cutting crusade is complete. 

The GOP cannot afford much opposition, given the narrow House majority. Already conservative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who opposes stopgap bills without automatic spending cuts, has said he will vote against it. The bill contains new funding to boost immigration enforcement that the White House requested. 

The bill extends a host of expiring health programs from April 1 to Sept. 30, including Medicare coverage of telehealth consultations with doctors and funding for community health centers.

Republican leaders have already wooed defense hawks in the party worried about a freeze on Pentagon spending. They’re planning to use a separate GOP-only tax cut package to add $100 billion in military spending.  

The stopgap bill would boost defense spending by $6 billion while cutting non-defense spending by $13 billion relative to current levels, resulting in an overall spending cut, according to a House Republican leader’s aide. It contains no lawmaker pet projects known as earmarks. 

Part of the defense boost goes toward a pay increase for military troops authorized by Congress last year. 

The bill goes into detail on which weapons systems account should be newly funded. Top Senate Republican appropriator Susan Collins told reporters she doesn’t support giving the Pentagon a blank check to decide which contracts to initiate.

Armed Services Chairman Mike Rogers and other hawks also secured flexibility for the Pentagon in the bill to boost the military’s ability to make new weapons purchases, which would typically not be allowed under a continuing resolution. 

The bill would grant the Pentagon the ability to transfer money into new accounts. The flexibility could allow for spending on new Virginia-class submarines and ships built by General Dynamics Corp.’s Electric Boat and HII’s Newport News Shipbuilding.

Democrats are lining up to oppose the stopgap measure because it would freeze spending. The bill would also claw back $20.2 billion in spending for the Internal Revenue Service passed as part of President Joe Biden’s signature green-energy Inflation Reduction Act. Democrats say that is a poison pill that they cannot support because it would boost tax cheating by the wealthy. 

Democrats said a spending freeze effectively cuts crucial benefits.

House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said in a letter the Republican measure “threatens to cut funding for health care, nutritional assistance and veterans benefits through the end of the current fiscal year. That is not acceptable.” 

The minority party prefers a short-term bill to avoid a shutdown at the end of next week in order to allow talks to continue on detailed appropriations bills allowing 1% growth to defense and non-defense spending. The stopgap bill is below 1% spending cap increases approved in a bipartisan 2023 bill. 

A House Republican aide said the bill has increases for veterans benefits, housing assistance and fully funds food assistance for women and children. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

CohnReznick makes plans after scoring private equity funding

Published

on

CohnReznick is planning to expand after becoming the latest major firm to receive a private equity investment, through funds advised by Apax Partners.

The deal with Apax was announced late last month and will cause the New York-based Top 25 Firm to set up an alternative practice structure, splitting the attest and non-attest sides, as has become common with PE-related deals. Once the transaction closes, CohnReznick CEO David Kessler will be CEO of CohnReznick Advisory LLC, on the non-attest side, while assurance partner Kelly O’Callaghan will become CEO of CohnReznick LLP, the attest business. 

The amount of the investment was undisclosed. The funds advised by Apax, alongside with an independent co-investor, will collectively own a 51% stake in the non-attest business. 

“We’ve had discussions in the private equity arena for a couple of years now, and we made the decision over this past summer that this was the right path for us, and we ventured down the process,” Kessler told Accounting Today. “Apax was very aligned with our management strategy, and we feel it’s going to have an impact on our growth in the future, and we’re looking forward to partnering with them.”

He believes the deal will add more capabilities for the firm to expand geographically in its existing areas as well as new territory. “We’re very heavy in the Northeast and the Mid-Atlantic, and we want to expand in the Southeast, Midwest and West Coast,” said Kessler. “We have a good presence right now in the Southeast, in the Midwest and on the West Coast, but we think this is an opportunity to expand our footprint and then also to really bring in advisory firms that we feel are compatible to the industries and clients that we serve, so we’re looking at this as an opportunity to really accelerate our growth.”

Both Apax and CohnReznick representatives will be on the board of the advisory entity, but only CohnReznick partners will be on the board of the attest business. “All of our partners will be partners in the advisory entity, along with Apax funds, and only our attest partners will be partners in the attest entity,” said Kessler.

The firm had been approached by a number of PE suitors in recent years. “We’ve probably spoken with a dozen to two dozen private equity funds over the past three years,” said Kessler. “We’ve been trying to educate ourselves on the benefits in the alternative practice structure and the model and what it would be for our staff and our clients and our partners. We spent a lot of time with a lot of different private equity funds looking into what a potential partnership could look like.”

While he and other partners liked many of the PE firms they spoke with, he said one of the things that stood out about Apax was its culture. “We really liked how they took the time to understand us and our history and how we got to this point in our vision and our strategy growing in the future, and we felt like we were aligned on the growth strategy,” said Kessler. “And we liked the fact that they did their homework on us. I think we gained a mutual respect for each other.”

O’Callghan agrees. “Partnering with Apax, they really did believe in our growth strategy, our culture, which we think is very special and important, as well as our talent and the people that we have now,” she said.

The firm has approximately 350 partners and 5,000 global employees, including 4,000 people in the U.S., and approximately 1,000 in India and the Philippines. CohnReznick has been able to double in size in the last five years, largely organically, while also doing some strategic acquisitions in key locations, Kessler noted. He would like to enhance the pace of acquisitions and the technology used by the firm internally and for clients. Partnering with a PE fund will help accelerate the firm’s ability to advance the tech projects that are already in the works over the finish line. 

O’Callaghan predicts the deal will create greater opportunities for the firm’s people as well as create opportunities with a larger platform for their career advancement. She has been the service line leader for assurance of the firm’s largest region, the Northeast, and also the partner in charge of its relationship with the AICPA for years. She has worked at the firm for 25 years, and Kessler for 39 years.

“When I started, we had two offices, so we were able to grow from two offices to 29 and $1.1 billion in revenue, and we think this will be the next acceleration,” said Kessler.

The deal was valued at $2 billion, according to The Wall Street Journal, but Kessler would neither confirm nor deny that figure.

CohnReznick plans to use the extra funds to expand its audit and tax practice as well as HIPAA advisory, client accounting services, performance improvement and transaction advisory services, and more. 

“We’re looking to enhance all the existing areas that we’re in and always identifying new areas to grow into, but we’ll continue to evolve as we always have,” said Kessler. “But the advisory practices that we currently are involved with are seeing a lot of traction, and we plan to enhance those services.” 

One area where CohnReznick has been seeing growth is public and private partnerships to help build infrastructure like airports, train stations and highways. In 2022, the firm helped monitor redevelopment of New York’s JFK Airport.

“We’ve done some work with the airports,” said Kessler. “We’ve done some work with Union Station in Washington, D.C. train and California highways, so we have a good project finance group. We do a lot of work with financial modeling, and infrastructure is one of the areas that they focus on, as well as all real estate credit incentives.”

Emergency management may be another area with the rise in natural disasters. “I think there’s a lot of opportunity across every single state, and one of the areas we focus on is emergency management and doing project management of large financial distributions that states are responsible for,” said Kessler,

Audit and attest service expansion will probably depend on the uncertain regulatory environment. 

“Right now, I see us focused on our core assurance practice,” said O’Callaghan. “If there’s new opportunities that present themselves through the regulatory environment, then we would absolutely entertain those potential opportunities, but that’s really driven by regulators.”

The new Trump administration is likely to pursue fewer regulations on auditors and accountants, but the changes are hard to predict. 

“I think we’re still vetting out what those changes are going to be,” said O’Callaghan. “It’s been almost two months now with the new administration, so we’ll have to see. Things are moving quickly, but we’ll have to see where everything falls out at the end.”

They’re both hopeful about the prospects for the firm and the overall accounting profession. “We think this is an exciting time for our profession,” said Kessler. “We’ve been in this business for a long time, and our partners have been in this business for a long time. It’s just an exciting time for our profession when you have institutional capital, and particularly private equity funds that are smart and are investing in the profession. They’re investing in the growth and the quality of the profession, and it’s just exciting to be a part of it. It really feels like we’re at a precipice to advance how we serve our clients, and it’s just an exciting time to be a CPA.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Art of Accounting: 5 reasons for failing to grow and how to change them

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

This is a strange topic to bring up during tax season, but it is as good a time as any to take stock of your practice and your long-term goals. This is a two and a half-minute read and hopefully you will read it a couple of times, and then will dedicate some serious thinking about it after tax season when you are more relaxed.

Reason 1: You do not want to grow. This is a personal decision and, if that is your decision, then there is nothing wrong with it and you shouldn’t obsess over it. Do what is necessary to maintain your practice as it is now so it will continue that way as long as you want to keep working.

Reason 2: You do not delegate delegable decisions. That means you are not using leverage to pass on every task that can be done by someone else. You tend to want to make every decision. In many cases it is important for you to make the decision, but it cannot be so in every case. Delegate more. Part of growing is for your staff to also grow. That growth comes when they are empowered to take charge, supervise and make decisions. I can pretty much guarantee that some of those decisions will be wrong, so do not delegate decisions that could put a client, or you, out of business. Everything short of that can be handled when a wrong decision is made. That is part of growing. Think of a baby learning to walk and the many times they fall until they finally do not fall. What is that smile worth?

Reason 3: You run your firm as if it were a CPA practice and not a business. You are in a business that happens to perform professional accounting services. You are first a business owner and manager and second, a CPA. If you could not succeed in your own practice, you would still find work as a CPA, but it would just be in someone else’s practice. Being in business means you have the ultimate responsibility for everything that happens in your business. This also means you need to control it, oversee the quality, handle the hiring, perform the marketing, manage your customers, and get regular financial reports and daily key performance indicators to help you manage better. You also need to strategize and plan the growth. A hint on how to perform your ownership functions is to do what you would tell yourself to do if you were your client. Work, manage and lead as an owner.

Reason 4: Evaluate everything you do with a long-term view. You are not in business to get tax returns out the door, but to provide professional services to people who rely on you and pay you for that. Short-term fixes do not provide long-term benefits, processes, procedures and duplicable practices in repetitive functions. I know many accountants who start every year and every tax season where they left off last year. That is not growth and not working off of a sustainable business model. Serious reflection should be made over every part of your practice. You can identify most of the important issues and then pick the more serious ones, or the most serious, and start with those. Spending time trying to improve, streamline or fix the most serious issue confronting your growth ain’t such a bad idea.

Reason 5: Insufficient cash flow. Continuously being short of cash thwarts clear thinking about growth or anything not directly related to getting the cash to pay the payroll and other bills. The cash flow needs to be worked out. I recently wrote a column on how to deal with this. If this is a problem, concentrate on getting this worked out so you will have a clear head to develop a clear direction. Tax season is a great time to get this done — consider an extra increase for every tax return you are working on right now. Delaying or denying this will delay or deny your growth.

This is a good short list with some takeaways that could be implemented pretty quickly. There are many other reasons and things you could do, but any of the above is a good start.

Do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected] with your practice management questions or about engagements you might not be able to perform.

Continue Reading

Accounting

UBS found guilty in France of harassing two tax whistleblowers

Published

on

A UBS Group AG unit was found guilty by a French court of harassing two whistleblowers who lifted the lid on the bank’s efforts to help wealthy locals dodge taxes.

UBS France — as the unit was known during the investigation — retaliated against its former auditor Nicolas Forissier by sidelining him and refusing to promote him to executive director after he disclosed information to bosses within the company, the Paris criminal court ruled on Monday. 

“UBS was trying to bully its employee,” the lead Paris judge said. The court also found the bank guilty of penalizing another whistleblower, Stéphanie Gibaud, who helped French authorities spy on clients at an event organized around the 2011 Roland-Garros tennis tournament.

UBS Europe, which took over from the unit, was fined €75,000 ($81,300) — the maximum allowed by law at the time of the wrongdoing. The court also granted Forissier €50,000 in damages.

The harassment case is an offshoot of a wider legal saga in France that has been going on for more than 15 years. It culminated in a money laundering conviction for the Swiss bank as part of a prosecution effort that stemmed in part from the Forissier report.

That separate case isn’t entirely finished after France’s top court said in 2023 that a €1.8 billion penalty UBS had received should be reexamined, opening the door to a possible cut.

UBS said in a statement that it disagrees with the conviction, which it finds “unjust.” The Swiss bank said it will “analyze the decision and decide on next steps.”

Continue Reading

Trending