Premium collection of dark, milk and white chocolates.
Anna Kurzaeva | Moment | Getty Images
U.S. buyers of Swiss products, from luxury watches and skincare to artisan chocolates, could soon face sharp price rises if negotiators are unable to strike a deal to avert 39% tariffs due to come into effect on Thursday.
The announcement last week that Switzerland faces one of the highest U.S. tariff rates in the world stunned many politicians, analysts and businesses, who had thought the country was close to negotiating a deal similar to those of the European Union and U.K., which got baseline rates of 15% and 10% respectively.
The U.S. has a hefty trade deficit with Switzerland, totaling $38.3 billion in 2024. The Swiss government points out that the gap is in part because of the latter’s status as the world’s biggest center of gold refining, with huge quantities of the precious metal passing through the country for processing before it is sent around the world. Both gold and silver were exempted from the White House’s “reciprocal tariff” policy launched in April.
The U.S. is also a major importer of Swiss pharmaceuticals, an industry that has been mired in confusion over the tariff rates it will face, and medical devices. Pharma products are currently exempt from the 39% levies, though sector-specific tariffs may yet come under the U.S.’s separate Section 232 investigation.
The U.S. was the biggest overseas market for Swiss watches in 2024, with exports totaling 4.37 billion Swiss francs ($5.4 billion), according to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry.
To qualify as Swiss-made, at least 60% of a watch’s production cost must be Swiss-based, while its technical development must be conducted in the country.
“Swiss watches have long been a cornerstone of the U.S. market, and a 39% tariff would be a real shake-up,” Paul Altieri, founder and CEO of online resale platform Bob’s Watches, told CNBC.
“Suddenly, every import would carry a hefty extra cost, and dealers would face tough choices — absorb the tariff, eat into margins, or pass it on to customers. You’d likely see longer lead times as brands and retailers realign logistics, and higher sticker prices across the board.” The retail price of a Rolex Submariner could jump from $10,000 to nearly $14,000, he noted.
For Swiss watch businesses, a 39% tariff would be “devastating,” Jean-Philippe Bertschy, head of Swiss equity research at Vontobel, told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” on Tuesday.
“They increased the prices already in spring by an average of 5 to 10%, I think another hit will be quite difficult for the U.S. consumer for sure, especially for the entry into the mid-segment level.” In a research note, Vontobel flagged Swatch as vulnerable to a tariff hit, with shares falling 2.3% on Monday.
“For the luxury watches, for the brands like Rolex, Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet, you have some long waiting lists. So I think it’s going to be more comfortable for these companies to increase the prices,” Bertschy continued.
“You have very limited measures to take. You can, of course, increase efficiencies and to try to do some other measures to counter U.S. tariffs, but overall, very challenging for the industry.”
Coffee
Consumer goods giant Nestlé is one of Switzerland’s biggest firms. The company says that it faces a minimal direct impact from tariffs because it produces more than 90% of what it sells in the U.S. locally.
That’s generally the case for consumer staples such as instant coffee or bottled water which are high-volume, low-ticket items, James Edwardes Jones, managing director of consumer research at RBC Capital Markets, told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe.”
Its popular Nespresso coffee brand, known for at-home coffee machines and capsule pods, could, however, be among those goods exposed to higher rates and therefore price hikes.
“In Nestle’s case specifically, Nespresso is all manufactured in Switzerland and then exported around the world, so it seems likely that will be caught in a small way,” Edwardes Jones added.
Nestle did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the impact of Swiss levies. The company does not specify the level of its U.S. sales for Nespresso, but its half-year results showed North America grew at a “strong double-digit rate.”
Skincare
Switzerland’s world-renowned beauty and skincare products could also be subject to price hikes as brands not included in a pharmaceutical tariff exemption look to offset higher import costs.
That could be most notable for companies that pride themselves on Swiss production, such as caviar-based anti-aging skincare brand La Prairie, spa supplier Valmont and nail care business Mavala, none of which responded to CNBC’s request for comment.
“While Swiss firms can generally weather a 10-15% tariff without major margin erosion or demand loss, 39% sets the bar much higher,” Lombard Odier said in a Monday note.
Lausanne-headquartered Galderma, whose products include injectable aesthetics and Cetaphil facewash, meanwhile, said that it does not produce in Switzerland and is currently largely excluded from global tariffs under pharma exemptions.
However, its large production capacity in the European Union, U.K. and Canada could be subject to higher levies, potentially hitting consumer costs.
Luxury
Higher import duties are also seen pushing up the price of luxury goods, including Richemont-owned high-end jewelry brands Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels.
BofA Securities said in a note Tuesday that 7% of Richemont’s input costs would be exposed to higher Swiss tariffs, likely adding to higher consumer prices. “Price increases would be the most obvious way to mitigate the headwind,” the analysts wrote.
Cartier, a unit of Cie. Richemont SA, luxury watches sit on display in a store front.
Bloomberg | Getty Images
Richemont did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the 39% rate, however it flagged in its first-quarter earnings that tariffs could lead to “increased prices,” which could impact consumer demand.
Lombard Odier noted that a “small fraction” of luxury exports could see demand for their products increase with price, but broadly price hikes were set to hurt consumer demand.
Chocolate
Roger Wehrli, director of Swiss chocolatiers’ manufacturing association Chocosuisse, said a 39% tariff rate would be passed on via prices and cause a steep loss of U.S. business for many of the group’s members. The recent appreciation of the Swiss franc against the U.S. dollar, which causes imports to become more expensive, means the effective price increase would be closer to 55%, he noted.
The main impact will be on small- and medium-sized businesses that are unable to utilize U.S. production sites like big multinationals can, Wehrli said. Industry juggernauts Lindt & Sprüngli and Barry Callebaut already have factories stateside, while smaller Chocosuisse members such as Camille Bloch and Läderach produce exclusively in Switzerland.
“There’s another specific problem with producing in the United States,” Wehrli continued.
“If you want to label your chocolate as Swiss then it has to be produced in Switzerland. That’s a quality sign in the international market, so you will more or less lose your customers if it’s not Swiss origin anymore,” Wehrli told CNBC.
These rules of origin forced Toblerone, owned by U.S. group Mondelez International, to change its packaging in 2023 to refer to itself as being “established in Switzerland” rather than “Swiss chocolate” after it moved some of its production from the Swiss capital Bern to Slovakia. CNBC has contacted Mondelez for comment on the impact of tariffs on Toblerone in the U.S.
On July 20, Andy Burnham has been chosen to be the next Prime Minister in UK. The appointment of a new Prime Minister in the United Kingdom often raises questions from people outside the country, especially when no nationwide election has taken place. Many wonder how a new national leader can assume office without voters casting ballots. The answer lies in the UK’s parliamentary system, where the Prime Minister is not directly elected by the public but is instead chosen based on who commands the confidence of the House of Commons.
How the UK Selects Its Prime Minister
Unlike presidential systems where citizens vote directly for the head of government, the United Kingdom elects Members of Parliament (MPs) during a general election. The political party that secures a majority of seats in the House of Commons usually forms the government, and that party selects its own leader to serve as Prime Minister.
If the leader resigns, becomes unable to continue, or is replaced by their party, the governing party can choose a new leader without triggering a general election. As long as the new leader is able to maintain the confidence of Parliament, they can immediately become Prime Minister after being formally appointed by the monarch.
Why No Election Was Required
A general election is not automatically required every time the office of Prime Minister changes hands. The governing party retains its parliamentary majority because voters elected MPs rather than an individual Prime Minister. If the ruling party chooses a new leader through its internal leadership process, the government continues to operate without interruption.
This constitutional arrangement provides stability and allows the government to continue functioning during periods of political transition. It also avoids the expense and disruption of holding a nationwide election every time party leadership changes.
The King’s Constitutional Role
After a governing party elects a new leader, the monarch invites that individual to form a government. This constitutional step is largely ceremonial and follows long-established conventions. The King appoints the person most likely to command a majority in the House of Commons, ensuring continuity of government.
Although the monarch formally appoints the Prime Minister, political power rests with Parliament and the elected representatives of the British people.
Could an Election Still Happen?
Yes. A newly appointed Prime Minister has the authority to request a general election if they believe it is politically advantageous or if they seek a stronger public mandate. Parliament can also reach a point where a government loses the confidence of the House of Commons, potentially leading to an election or the formation of a new government.
In many cases, however, a new Prime Minister continues governing until the next scheduled general election.
What This Means for the UK
The UK’s parliamentary democracy is designed to ensure government continuity while respecting the results of the most recent general election. Leadership changes within the governing party do not automatically alter the composition of Parliament, which is why a new Prime Minister can take office without another nationwide vote.
Understanding this process helps explain why political transitions in the United Kingdom can appear different from those in countries with presidential systems. While the Prime Minister may change, the democratic mandate of Parliament remains in place until voters elect a new House of Commons at the next general election.
On July 21, 2026, global economic analysis shifts focus toward a defining structural macroeconomic trend: the massive expansion of public and private capital deployment into high-capacity electrical grid infrastructure. As industrial electrification, automated data center hubs, and renewable energy integration accelerate worldwide, sovereign governments and institutional investors are facing a monumental economic challenge. Updating legacy power grids to meet skyrocketing demand has emerged as a primary driver of long-term capital expenditures and industrial productivity across both developed and emerging market economies.
According to international economic policy updates released this week, grid infrastructure investments are projected to exceed multi-trillion-dollar thresholds over the coming decade. Economic planners caution that without modernized, high-voltage transmission networks, regional manufacturing sectors face severe energy bottlenecks, localized power price volatility, and operational constraints. Consequently, infrastructure spending is rapidly transitioning from passive utility maintenance into a vital component of national economic competitiveness and industrial policy.
The macroeconomic ripple effects of this capital deployment are being felt across global commodity markets and labor networks. High demand for structural industrial inputs—such as copper, aluminum, specialized electrical steel, and high-capacity transformers—has created sustained pricing support for critical material producers. Simultaneously, the specialized technical labor required to manufacture and deploy modern grid hardware is driving wage growth in industrial sectors, adding a complex new layer to central bank disinflation trajectories.
For global policymakers and strategic investors, the economics of energy grid modernization represent a double-edged sword. While massive infrastructure investment boosts short-term gross domestic product (GDP) and strengthens domestic industrial foundations, it requires disciplined fiscal allocation to prevent inflationary crowding-out of private capital. Countries that efficiently streamline grid infrastructure permitting and mobilize private investment will secure lower long-term energy costs, attracting high-tech manufacturing and reinforcing sustainable economic growth.
The international trade architecture entering the second half of 2026 is undergoing a profound structural pivot. As major sovereign economic blocs adjust to the long-term impact of unilateral tariffs and escalating regional subsidies, traditional globalized supply chains are being rapidly replaced by bilateral trade corridors and regional alliance networks. Data released in late July 2026 highlights a significant divergence: while cross-continental freight volumes between non-aligned partners have cooled, intra-regional trade throughout North America, Southeast Asia, and Eastern Europe has surged to record levels. This shift reflects a broader macroeconomic strategy wherein multinational corporations prioritize geopolitical resilience over pure cost minimization.
The primary economic catalyst behind this regionalization is the proliferation of sector-specific tariffs targeting critical industries, notably battery components, clean energy technology, and advanced semiconductor hardware. In response, global manufacturers have adopted multi-tier sourcing models that distribute production across intermediate partner nations before final assembly. While this strategy successfully bypasses primary import duties, it adds structural layers of logistical complexity and administrative oversight. Economists note that while total output remains robust, aggregate production costs have drifted upward, contributing to persistent baseline inflation across major consumer markets.
Simultaneously, currency settlement patterns within these regional blocs are experiencing a notable transformation. Sovereign central banks and commercial institutions are increasingly utilizing localized currency swap lines and digital clearing mechanisms to settle cross-border trade transactions. This transition reduces direct exposure to foreign exchange volatility and mitigates third-party liquidity constraints, further solidifying regional economic cohesion. However, for developing economies situated outside these primary trading alliances, the tightening of international trade networks presents severe challenges, restricting access to key export markets and foreign direct investment.
For corporate strategists and policy analysts navigating late 2026, success requires a thorough understanding of these emerging trade corridors. Organizations must conduct regular risk assessments of their multi-tier supplier networks, model tariff sensitivities under shifting geopolitical scenarios, and invest in real-time supply chain telemetry. As regional economic blocs strengthen their regulatory borders, supply chain agility and compliance fortitude will distinguish market leaders from vulnerable enterprises in the evolving global economy.