Connect with us

Accounting

How financial advisors guide client taxes through divorce

Published

on

One of the best wedding gifts is a scanner, according to financial advisor Ekaterina Klimentova.

To explain why, the partner in the New York office of registered investment advisory firm Cerity Partners who is a certified public accountant as well as a certified divorce financial analyst shared the story of two clients’ divorces. One had shred all documents that were at least 10 years old. The other kept all of them, dating back 22 years or more.

“I unfortunately have had situations where records would really make a huge difference,” Klimentova said. “The person was a real hoarder and that really paid well for them. … The better you’re educated, the better you’re informed and the better records you have, you will always come out ahead.”

READ MORE: Divorce planning for clients: A guide for financial advisors

While lawyers play the lead role in representing divorcées during the legal agreement process, advisors and tax professionals must prepare their clients for the possibility of a divorce and guide them through the financial complexities of completing the formal separation of a marriage. 

Multifaceted and evolving family dynamics and technical tasks in the tax reckoning for prior estate-planning strategies such as increasingly popular spousal lifetime access trusts demand careful attention through a highly stressful time in clients’ lives. The IRS may compare the first return after the divorce to those from as long as three years earlier, according to Klimentova.

“It really becomes important not only to know what’s on it, but what your potential liability may be and how do you account for that in your divorce agreement?” she said. “There’s plenty of work for a tax professional or a financial advisor to do in a situation like that.”

Emotionally and financially taxing questions

Guides compiled by the IRS, advisor matchmaking and lead generation service SmartAsset and tax software firms H&R Block and TurboTax cover key questions about tax filing status, the filing of amended returns if the marriage is annulled (or treated as if it never happened), the need to file under the name registered with the Social Security Administration or change it and the handling of possible transfers of property or individual retirement account assets. Each employed spouse must tweak their tax withholding by filling out a new Form W-4

And the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act altered the tax treatment of alimony payments for divorces finalized in 2019 or later, so that financial support paid by one ex-spouse to another is no longer deductible to the one sending the money nor included in the taxable income of the one getting the dollars. In addition, the law ruled out any possible deductions for legal fees.

Some of the most difficult issues revolve around a couple’s children, whether in terms of how advisors’ emotional and behavioral roles in their clients’ lives may spill into psychology or in the complicated tax requirements connected to those topics.

READ MORE: Gray divorce can derail retirement. Here’s how advisors can help 

Child support payments are neither deductible or counted as income to the recipients, but only one spouse may claim a kid as a dependent — even if the custody is split 50-50. The spouse claiming the child as a dependent becomes the “custodial” parent and gets eligibility for the earned income tax credit and the child and dependent care tax credit. However, the non-custodial parent could get the child tax credit and additional child tax credit by filing Form 8332, which requires the signature of the custodial spouse.

“Generally, the parent with custody of a child can claim that child on their tax return to file as head of household or claim credits,” according to the IRS guidance on divorces and separations. “We might audit your return and ask for information to verify your claimed dependents and credits.”

From a technical perspective that also ties into the emotional side of money and wealth, even tougher topics could come up with the transition of assets. They could revolve around the treatment of capital gains, a qualified domestic relations order relating to alternate payees for retirement-plan benefits, possible gift-tax implications governing the timing of property transfers, so-called carryforwards and carrybacks and specific quandaries relating to family businesses, according to a 2022 guide to the key tax questions in divorces in the journal of the Association of International Certified Public Accountants, “The Tax Adviser,” by Amy Kinkaid and Charles Federanich of Pease Bell CPAs.

“Navigating a divorce can be an emotional experience for clients, and assisting them can likewise be poignant for their tax advisers, particularly when the adviser has a long-established relationship with both spouses,” Kinkaid and Federanich wrote. “Once a client notifies you they are contemplating a divorce and any potential conflict-of-interest matters are resolved, it is important to swiftly meet and address tax planning issues. It is imperative to collaborate with the divorce attorneys and investment advisors so that the time frame to plan and structure optimal tax outcomes for the parties is addressed and deadlines are met.”

READ MORE: Meet the CDFA, a certification for advisors with clients facing divorce

Start with the basics

Even though advisors may have been working with both spouses for many years, the conflicts involved with counseling them throughout the divorce on “very different” goals during the separation are so substantial that “it’s probably best for each of the parties to have their own advisors to get independent advice,” Klimentova said.

The financial ramifications of any possible separation in the future necessitate frequent and careful scrutiny of any prenuptial agreements. In fact, advisors should add them to the list of documents to request from incoming clients, Klimentova noted. Shaking off the dust from an agreement that may be decades-old can often prove a costly endeavor, and what sounded like an appropriate amount of spousal support to retain the same standard of living 20 years ago may not pay for a single credit card bill today, she said.

“Like any financial plan, it has to be a living, breathing thing. It’s never static,” Klimentova said. “By paying attention to these things, you could really help your clients out. The more you look, the more questions you ask, the better you’re off.”

READ MORE: Prenups protect more than clients’ money, divorce lawyers say

In that vein, tax advantages for spousal lifetime access trusts may have caused clients eager to get the savings to ignore how divorce represents a very real risk to the estate strategy. The separation would entail a careful accounting of the trust assets, Klimentova said.

“You’re basically giving up control of the asset,” she said. “This still can be evaluated and the attorneys really have to look at the situation, what was the intent, to see if there’s a possibility that these assets can be replaced by something else in the marital estate.”

At a basic level, while no advisor, tax pro or spouse can predict the future, they can perform the essential work of ensuring that both members of the couple take the time to educate themselves about their family’s finances. All too frequently, partners will say something along the lines of “‘Oh, my spouse handles the tax returns,'” according to Klimentova.

“It’s very important for any advisor to make sure to tell their clients to always, always pay attention to what is on your tax return,” she said. “The fact that you did not want to look at your return does not make you not liable for the potential tax penalties.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending