Connect with us

Personal Finance

How kids from rich families learn about money

Published

on

Institut auf dem Rosenberg, a private boarding school in St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Courtesy: Institut auf dem Rosenberg

With a sticker price of more than $160,000 a year, Institut auf dem Rosenberg in St. Gallen, Switzerland, may be one of the most expensive boarding schools in the world. So, it’s only fitting that students learn about money.

But rather than focusing on basic budgeting and managing credit, finance classes at the elite Swiss institution cover wealth creation, philanthropy, family businesses and succession management.

“Being able to educate these future leaders gives us the privilege to pioneer course concepts,” said Bernhard Gademann, president of the school. “Everybody should know about interest rates, inflation, share investment portfolios — nobody teaches this.”

More from Personal Finance:
‘Recession pop’ is in: How music hits on economic trends
Why a job is ‘becoming more compelling’ for teens
More Americans are struggling even as inflation cools

In one of the most popular classes, which covers wealth creation and finance, students manage hypothetical $1 million portfolios and present their investment picks to the mock board of a family office — private companies that wealthy families establish to handle their investment management.

Classroom discussions, for students ages 12-18, cover various asset classes, risk versus reward and the power of compounding.

Too often, these topics are left out of traditional curriculums because they are considered “nonacademic,” Gademann said. However, these ideas overlap with the same concepts taught in math and biology, among other subjects.

Bernhard Gademann with students in a class.

Courtesy: Institut auf dem Rosenberg

“It’s truly important to understand the dynamics, the implications and why it’s relevant because it touches every aspect of your daily life,” Gademann said. “All of these things are interconnected, and wealth creation shouldn’t be ignored.”

“Not being able to provide [students] with this information and training is really stealing an opportunity for them being successful,” he added.

The lifetime benefit of a financial education

While most students don’t have access to these types of classes, more U.S. high schools are tackling financial literacy.

As of 2024, more than half of all states already require or are in the process of requiring high school students to take a personal finance course before graduating, according to the latest data from Next Gen Personal Finance, a nonprofit focused on providing financial education to middle and high school students.

Research shows taking a financial education class in high school does pay off.

In fact, there is a lifetime benefit of roughly $100,000 per student from completing a one-semester course in personal finance, according to a report by consulting firm Tyton Partners and Next Gen.

Much of that financial value comes from learning how to avoid high-interest credit card debt and leveraging better credit scores to secure preferential borrowing rates for key expenses, such as insurance, auto loans and home mortgages, according to Tim Ranzetta, co-founder and CEO of Next Gen and a member of the CNBC Global Financial Wellness Advisory Board.

However, often what students are most interested in is investing. “Students are at the edge of their seats when you ask them about building wealth and becoming a millionaire,” said Yanely Espinal, Next Gen’s director of educational outreach.

As a result, teachers and schools are starting to prioritize those lessons because they have the highest engagement among students of all of the personal finance topics, Espinal said. “Hook them where they are most interested.”

Push for personal finance as a graduation requirement

Still, “when you teach investing, focus on the long term,” advised Espinal, who is also a member of the CNBC Global Financial Wellness Advisory Board. And budgeting, banking, paying for college, taxes, credit management and the psychology of money are equally important, she said.

“Let’s not leave financial education to TikTok,” she said. “We have to get serious about creating a formal education.”

Let’s not leave financial education to TikTok.

Yanely Espinal

director of educational outreach at Next Gen

Many studies also show there is a strong connection between financial literacy and financial well-being.

Students who are required to take personal finance courses starting from a young age are more likely to tap lower-cost loans and grants when it comes to paying for college and less likely to rely on private loans or high-interest credit cards, according to a 2018 report by Christiana Stoddard and Carly Urban for the National Endowment for Financial Education.

Further, students with a financial literacy course under their belt have better average credit scores and lower debt delinquency rates as young adults, according to 2016 data from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s Investor Education Foundation, which seeks to promote financial education.

In addition, a study by the Brookings Institution in 2018 found that teenage financial literacy is positively correlated with asset accumulation and net worth by age 25.

Among adults, those with greater financial literacy find it easier to make ends meet in a typical month, are more likely to make loan payments in full and on time, and less likely to be constrained by debt or be considered financially fragile.

They are also more likely to save and plan for retirement, according to data from the TIAA Institute-GFLEC Personal Finance Index based on research, which has been conducted annually since 2017.

Meanwhile, in the U.S., the trend toward in-school personal finance classes is continuing to gain steam.

There are another 50 personal finance education bills pending in 20 states, according to Next Gen’s bill tracker.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Trump plan to freeze funding stymies Biden-era energy rebates for consumers

Published

on

Westend61 | Westend61 | Getty Images

Some states have stopped disbursing funds to consumers via Biden-era rebate programs tied to home energy efficiency, due to a Trump administration freeze on federal funding enacted in January.

The Inflation Reduction Act, passed in 2022, had earmarked $8.8 billion of federal funds for consumers through two home energy rebate programs, to be administered by states, territories and the District of Columbia.

Arizona, Colorado, Georgia and Rhode Island — which are in various phases of rollout — have paused or delayed their fledgling programs, citing Trump administration policy.

The White House on Jan. 27 put a freeze on the disbursement of federal funds that conflict with President Trump’s agenda — including initiatives related to green energy and climate change — as a reason for halting the disbursement of rebate funds to consumers.

That fate of that freeze is still up in the air. A federal judge issued an order Tuesday that continued to block the policy, for example. However, it appears agencies had been withholding funding in some cases in defiance of earlier court rulings, according to ProPublica reporting.

In any event, the freeze — or the threat of it — appears to be impacting state rebate programs.

“Coloradans who would receive the Home Energy Rebate savings are still locked out by the Trump administration in the dead of winter,” Ari Rosenblum, a spokesperson for the Colorado Energy Office, said in an e-mailed statement.

The U.S. Department of Energy and the White House didn’t return a request for comment from CNBC on the funding freeze.

In some states, rebates are ‘currently unavailable’

Consumers are eligible for up to $8,000 of Home Efficiency Rebates and up to $14,000 of Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates, per federal law.

The rebates defray the cost of retrofitting homes and upgrading appliances to be more energy efficient. Such tweaks aim to cut consumers’ utility bills while also reducing planet-warming carbon emissions.

California, the District of Columbia, Maine, Michigan, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina and Wisconsin had also launched phases of their rebate programs in recent months, according to data on an archived federal website.

All states and territories (except for South Dakota) had applied for the federal rebate funding and the U.S. Department of Energy had approved funding for each of them.

More from Personal Finance:
Gold is hot — but a classic Warren Buffett rule suggests caution
What upcoming budget negotiations may mean for Social Security
How Trump, DOGE job cuts may affect the economy

The Arizona Governor’s Office of Resiliency said its Home Energy Rebates programs would be paused until federal funds are freed up.

“Due to the current federal Executive Orders, memorandums from the White House Office of Management and Budget, and communications from the U.S. Department of Energy, funding for all Efficiency Arizona programs is currently unavailable,” it said in an announcement Friday.

Rhode Island paused new applications as of Jan. 27 due to “current uncertainty” with Inflation Reduction Act funding and executive orders, according to its Office of Energy Resources.

How Berkshire's insurers deal with climate change risk

The Georgia Environmental Finance Authority launched a pilot program for the rebates in fall 2024. That program is ongoing, a spokesperson confirmed Monday.

However, the timeline for a full program launch initially planned for 2025 “is delayed until we receive more information from the U.S. Department of Energy,” the Georgia spokesperson explained in an e-mail.

However, not all states have pressed the pause button: It appears Maine is still moving forward, for example.

“The program remains open to those who are eligible,” Afton Vigue, a spokesperson for the Maine Governor’s Energy Office, said in an e-mail.

The status of rebates in the eight other states and districts to have launched their programs is unclear. Their respective energy departments or governor’s offices didn’t return requests for comment.

‘Signs of an interest’

While the Trump administration on Jan. 29 rescinded its memo ordering a freeze on federal grants and loans — two days after its initial release — the White House said the freeze nonetheless remained in full force.

Democratic attorneys general in 22 states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming the freeze is unlawful. The White House has claimed it is necessary to ensure spending aligns with Trump’s presidential agenda.

David Terry, president of the National Association of State Energy Officials, said he is optimistic the rebate funding will be released to states soon.

“For these two particular programs, I do not think [the freeze] will stymie the programs,” Terry said. “I see signs of an interest in moving them forward and working with the states to implement them.”

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Social Security Fairness Act benefit increases to arrive this spring

Published

on

Skynesher | E+ | Getty Images

Lump sum payments to begin arriving in February

In a new update released on Tuesday, the SSA said it will begin issuing retroactive payments in February. Most people will receive the one-time payment by the end of March, according to the agency.

The SSA plans to process the increase to monthly benefits starting in April.

The new timeline “supports President Trump’s priority to implement the Social Security Fairness Act as quickly as possible,” Social Security acting commissioner Lee Dudek said in a statement.

“The agency’s original estimate of taking a year or more now will only apply to complex cases that cannot be processed by automation,” Dudek said. “The American people deserve to get their due benefits as quickly as possible.”

Top Social Security official exits after refusing DOGE access to sensitive data

Among those affected include some teachers, firefighters and police officers in certain states; federal employees who are covered by the Civil Service Retirement System and people who worked under foreign social security systems, according to the Social Security Administration.

What affected beneficiaries should know

Retroactive payments, which most people should receive by the end of March, will be deposited directly into bank accounts on file with the Social Security Administration.

All affected beneficiaries should receive a notice by mail from the Social Security Administration with details about their retroactive payment and new benefit amount. Those notices should come two to three weeks after the retroactive payments, according to the agency.

If your direct deposit information or current mailing address are up to date with the agency, no action is needed, according to the agency. If you want to double check the information the agency has on file, you may sign into your personal online account or call the agency.

If you want to ask about the status of your retroactive payment, the Social Security Administration urges you to hold off until April.

Beneficiaries should also wait until after they have received their April monthly check before contacting the agency to ask about their new benefit amount.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

The average IRS tax refund is 32.4% lower this season. Here’s why

Published

on

The average tax refund is 10.4% lower than last year according to the latest Internal Revenue Service data, and inflation is taking more of those dollars.

Bill Oxford | E+ | Getty Images

The average tax refund this year is down 32.4% compared to last year, according to early filing data from the IRS. 

Tax season opened on Jan. 27, and the average refund amount was $2,169 as of Feb. 14, down from $3,207 about one year prior, the IRS reported on Friday. That figure reflects current-year refunds only.

However, the Feb. 14 filing data doesn’t include refunds receiving the earned income tax credit or additional child tax credit, which aren’t issued before mid-February, the IRS noted. The previous year’s filing data included tax returns claiming these credits. The value of these tax breaks can be substantial, even resulting in five-figure refunds, in some cases.

More from Personal Finance:
2025 is a renter’s market, experts say — but less so for this kind of property
This tax break for retirement savers is a ‘well-kept secret,’ expert says
Here’s why Trump tariffs may raise your car insurance premiums

Typically, you can expect a refund when you overpay taxes throughout the year via paycheck withholdings or quarterly estimated payments. By comparison, there’s generally a tax bill when you haven’t paid enough.

Filing season numbers will ‘even out’

‘Don’t call the IRS’ for refund updates

The latest filing statistics come amid mass layoffs for the agency as Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, continues to cull the federal workforce

It’s unclear exactly how the staffing reduction could impact future taxpayer service. But experts recommend double-checking returns for accuracy to avoid extra touch points with the agency.

“Don’t call the IRS looking for your refund,” said Tom O’Saben, an enrolled agent and director of tax content and government relations at the National Association of Tax Professionals. 

You can check the status of your refund via the agency’s “Where’s My Refund?” tool or the IRS2Go app, which is “available 24 hours a day,” O’Saben said.

Typically, the agency issues refunds within 21 days of a return’s receipt. But some returns require “additional review,” which can extend the timeline, according to the IRS.

Future of CFPB: Here's what's at stake

Continue Reading

Trending