Connect with us

Personal Finance

How kids from rich families learn about money

Published

on

Institut auf dem Rosenberg, a private boarding school in St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Courtesy: Institut auf dem Rosenberg

With a sticker price of more than $160,000 a year, Institut auf dem Rosenberg in St. Gallen, Switzerland, may be one of the most expensive boarding schools in the world. So, it’s only fitting that students learn about money.

But rather than focusing on basic budgeting and managing credit, finance classes at the elite Swiss institution cover wealth creation, philanthropy, family businesses and succession management.

“Being able to educate these future leaders gives us the privilege to pioneer course concepts,” said Bernhard Gademann, president of the school. “Everybody should know about interest rates, inflation, share investment portfolios — nobody teaches this.”

More from Personal Finance:
‘Recession pop’ is in: How music hits on economic trends
Why a job is ‘becoming more compelling’ for teens
More Americans are struggling even as inflation cools

In one of the most popular classes, which covers wealth creation and finance, students manage hypothetical $1 million portfolios and present their investment picks to the mock board of a family office — private companies that wealthy families establish to handle their investment management.

Classroom discussions, for students ages 12-18, cover various asset classes, risk versus reward and the power of compounding.

Too often, these topics are left out of traditional curriculums because they are considered “nonacademic,” Gademann said. However, these ideas overlap with the same concepts taught in math and biology, among other subjects.

Bernhard Gademann with students in a class.

Courtesy: Institut auf dem Rosenberg

“It’s truly important to understand the dynamics, the implications and why it’s relevant because it touches every aspect of your daily life,” Gademann said. “All of these things are interconnected, and wealth creation shouldn’t be ignored.”

“Not being able to provide [students] with this information and training is really stealing an opportunity for them being successful,” he added.

The lifetime benefit of a financial education

While most students don’t have access to these types of classes, more U.S. high schools are tackling financial literacy.

As of 2024, more than half of all states already require or are in the process of requiring high school students to take a personal finance course before graduating, according to the latest data from Next Gen Personal Finance, a nonprofit focused on providing financial education to middle and high school students.

Research shows taking a financial education class in high school does pay off.

In fact, there is a lifetime benefit of roughly $100,000 per student from completing a one-semester course in personal finance, according to a report by consulting firm Tyton Partners and Next Gen.

Much of that financial value comes from learning how to avoid high-interest credit card debt and leveraging better credit scores to secure preferential borrowing rates for key expenses, such as insurance, auto loans and home mortgages, according to Tim Ranzetta, co-founder and CEO of Next Gen and a member of the CNBC Global Financial Wellness Advisory Board.

However, often what students are most interested in is investing. “Students are at the edge of their seats when you ask them about building wealth and becoming a millionaire,” said Yanely Espinal, Next Gen’s director of educational outreach.

As a result, teachers and schools are starting to prioritize those lessons because they have the highest engagement among students of all of the personal finance topics, Espinal said. “Hook them where they are most interested.”

Push for personal finance as a graduation requirement

Still, “when you teach investing, focus on the long term,” advised Espinal, who is also a member of the CNBC Global Financial Wellness Advisory Board. And budgeting, banking, paying for college, taxes, credit management and the psychology of money are equally important, she said.

“Let’s not leave financial education to TikTok,” she said. “We have to get serious about creating a formal education.”

Let’s not leave financial education to TikTok.

Yanely Espinal

director of educational outreach at Next Gen

Many studies also show there is a strong connection between financial literacy and financial well-being.

Students who are required to take personal finance courses starting from a young age are more likely to tap lower-cost loans and grants when it comes to paying for college and less likely to rely on private loans or high-interest credit cards, according to a 2018 report by Christiana Stoddard and Carly Urban for the National Endowment for Financial Education.

Further, students with a financial literacy course under their belt have better average credit scores and lower debt delinquency rates as young adults, according to 2016 data from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s Investor Education Foundation, which seeks to promote financial education.

In addition, a study by the Brookings Institution in 2018 found that teenage financial literacy is positively correlated with asset accumulation and net worth by age 25.

Among adults, those with greater financial literacy find it easier to make ends meet in a typical month, are more likely to make loan payments in full and on time, and less likely to be constrained by debt or be considered financially fragile.

They are also more likely to save and plan for retirement, according to data from the TIAA Institute-GFLEC Personal Finance Index based on research, which has been conducted annually since 2017.

Meanwhile, in the U.S., the trend toward in-school personal finance classes is continuing to gain steam.

There are another 50 personal finance education bills pending in 20 states, according to Next Gen’s bill tracker.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Average 401(k) savings rate hits a record high. See if you’re on track

Published

on

Seksan Mongkhonkhamsao | Moment | Getty Images

The average 401(k) plan savings rate recently notched a new record high — and the percentage is nearing a widely-used rule of thumb.

During the first quarter of 2025, the 401(k) savings rate, including employee and company contributions, jumped to 14.3%, according to Fidelity’s quarterly analysis of 25,300 corporate plans with 24.4 million participants.

More from FA Playbook:

Here’s a look at other stories affecting the financial advisor business.

Despite economic uncertainty, “we definitely saw a lot of positive behaviors continue into Q1,” said Mike Shamrell, vice president of thought leadership for Fidelity’s Workplace Investing. 

The report found that employees deferred a milestone 9.5% into 401(k) plans during the first quarter, and companies contributed 4.8%. The combined 14.3% rate is the closest it’s ever been to Fidelity’s recommended 15% savings target.    

Two-thirds of increased employee deferrals during the first quarter came from “auto-escalations,” which automatically boost savings rates over time, usually in tandem with salary increases, Shamrell said.

You should aim to save at least 15% of pre-tax income each year, including company deposits, to maintain your current lifestyle in retirement, according to Fidelity. This assumes you save continuously from ages 25 to 67.

But the exact right percentage for each individual hinges on several things, such as your existing nest egg, planned retirement date, pensions and other factors, experts say.

“There’s no magic rate of savings,” because everyone spends and saves differently, said certified financial planner Larry Luxenberg, founder of Lexington Avenue Capital Management in New City, New York. “That’s the case before and after retirement.”

There’s no magic rate of savings.

Larry Luxenberg

Founder of Lexington Avenue Capital Management

Don’t miss ‘free money’ from your employer

If you can’t reach the 15% retirement savings benchmark, Shamrell suggests deferring at least enough to get your employer’s full 401(k) matching contribution.

Most companies will match a percentage of your 401(k) deferrals up to a certain limit. These deposits could also be subject to a “vesting schedule,” which determines your ownership based on the length of time you’ve been with your employer.

Still, “this probably [is] the closest thing a lot of people are going to get to free money in their life,” he said.

The most popular 401(k) match formula — used by 48% of companies on Fidelity’s platform — is 100% for the first 3% an employee contributes, and 50% for the next 2%.

Department of Labor changes retirement account guardrails

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Average 401(k) balances fall due to market volatility, Fidelity says

Published

on

Trump White House pick clears path for crypto in 401(k)s

A few months of market swings have taken a toll on retirement savers.

The average 401(k) balance fell 3% in the first quarter of 2025 to $127,100, according to a new report by Fidelity Investments, the nation’s largest provider of 401(k) plans.

The average individual retirement account balance also sank 4% from the previous quarter to $121,983, the financial services firm found. Still, both 401(k) and IRA balances were up year over year.

The majority of retirement savers continue to contribute, Fidelity said. The average 401(k) contribution rate, including employer and employee contributions, increased to 14.3%, just shy of Fidelity’s suggested savings rate of 15%.

“Although the first quarter of 2025 posed challenges for retirement savers, it’s encouraging to see people take a continuous savings approach which focuses on their long-term retirement goals,” Sharon Brovelli, president of workplace investing at Fidelity Investments, said in a statement. “This approach will help individuals weather any type of market turmoil and stay on track.”

More from FA Playbook:

Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.

U.S. markets have been under pressure ever since the White House first announced country-specific tariffs on April 2.

Since then, ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and European Union as well as China, largely due to President Donald Trump‘s on-again, off-again negotiations, caused some of the worst trading days for the S&P 500 since the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic.

However, more recently, markets largely rebounded from earlier losses. As of Wednesday morning, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was roughly flat year-to-date, while the Nasdaq Composite and S&P 500 were up around 1% in 2025.

‘Have a long-term strategy’

“It’s important to not get too unnerved by market swings,” said Mike Shamrell, Fidelity’s vice president of thought leadership.

Even for those nearing retirement age, those savings should have a time horizon of at least 10 to 20 years, he said, which means it’s better to “have a long-term strategy and not a short-term reaction.”

Intervening, or trying to time the market, is almost always a bad idea, said Gil Baumgarten, CEO and founder of Segment Wealth Management in Houston.

“People lose sight of the long-term benefits of investing in volatile assets, they stay focused on short-term market movements, and had they stayed put, the market would have corrected itself,” he said. “The math is so compelling to look past all that and let the stock market work itself out.”

For example, the 10 best trading days by percentage gain for the S&P 500 over the past three decades all occurred during recessions, often in close proximity to the worst days, according to a Wells Fargo analysis published last year.

And, although stocks go up and down, the S&P 500 index has an average annualized return of more than 10% over the past few decades. In fact, since 1950, the S&P has delivered positive returns 77% of the time, according to CNBC’s analysis.

“Really, you should just be betting on equities rising over time,” Baumgarten said.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Why on-time debt payments may not boost your credit score

Published

on

Asiavision | E+ | Getty Images

Americans have a near-record level of credit card debt — $1.18 trillion as of the first quarter of 2025, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The average credit card debt per borrower was $6,371 during that time, based on data from TransUnion, one of the three major credit reporting companies.

Many people don’t understand why a common strategy that can help them pay down that debt — paying bills on time — isn’t all it takes to improve their credit. Separating fact from fiction is essential to help you pay down debt and raise your credit score. 

Here’s the truth behind a common credit myth: 

Myth: Paying bills on time ensures a high credit score. 

Fact: Your payment history is critical to your credit score. However, not all bill payments are treated equally, and making them on time isn’t all that counts.

Your credit score is a three-digit numerical snapshot, typically ranging from 300 to 850, that lets lenders know how likely you are to repay a loan. The average American’s score is 715, according to February data from scoring brand FICO.

What's a credit score?

Here’s what you need to know about on-time payments and your credit:

Not all debt payments factor into credit scores

More from Your Money:

Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

While some BNPL providers do report certain loans to the credit bureaus, this is not a universal practice. And BNPL users may see a negative credit impact if they fall behind.

“Some BNPL lenders will report missed payments, which can hurt your score,” said Matt Schulz, chief consumer finance analyst at LendingTree and author of “Ask Questions, Save Money, Make More.”

An easy way to check what payments are and aren’t influencing your credit: take a look at your credit report. You can pull it for free, weekly, for each of the major credit reporting agencies at Annualcreditreport.com.

‘Go for the A+’ on credit usage

Julpo | E+ | Getty Images

While payment history can account for 35% of your score, according to FICO, it’s not the only factor that matters. How much you owe relative to how much credit you have available to you — known as your “credit utilization” — is almost as important, at about 30% of your score. 

Higher utilization can hurt your score. Aim to use less than 30% of your available credit across all accounts, credit experts say, and keep it below 10% if you really want to improve your credit score. 

A 2024 LendingTree study found that consumers with credit scores of 720 and up had a utilization rate of 10.2%, compared with 36.2% for those with credit scores of 660 to 719.

“Don’t settle for B+ when you can go for the A+,” said Espinal, who is also the author of “Mind Your Money” and a member of the CNBC Global Financial Wellness Advisory Board. “You want to use less than 10% to really boost your score significantly.”

SIGN UP: Money 101 is an eight-week learning course on financial freedom, delivered weekly to your inbox. Sign up here. It is also available in Spanish.

Continue Reading

Trending