Connect with us

Personal Finance

How to talk about money as a couple: ‘Money Together’ authors

Published

on

Douglas and Heather Boneparth

Photo: Sylvie Rosokoff

Love is complicated. Add in money and it gets even more so.

But in their new book “Money Together,” Heather and Douglas Boneparth argue that having honest and proactive discussions about finances can make partners closer — and eventually, wealthier.

They begin their book, published last month, with an anecdote of a couple who had the difficult money talk a little late — on their honeymoon, over a cold seafood salad in Positano, Italy. (The Boneparths were also on vacation, and eavesdropping.) It became clear that the arguing pair had just discovered the husband had credit card debt, and that the wife’s parents weren’t paying off her student loans.

Of course, it would have been better if this couple had sorted these things out before they walked down the aisle. Yet couples fight so often about finances, at all stages, because “money is more than money,” Heather tells CNBC. Beneath these arguments is each partner’s unique history, disappointments, fears, desires and expectations.

More from Financial Advisor Playbook:

Here’s a look at other stories affecting the financial advisor business.

Heather and Douglas, who met during their freshman year of college and married in 2013, provide readers with advice on how to talk about money with your partner, and how to manage your finances in a long-term relationship to make it easier to get out of debt, buy a house and accomplish other shared and separate goals. In their telling, that’ll first involve understanding what money means to your partner and why — and moving beyond fantasies about the future and each other.

“At some point, your loose conversations have to turn concrete,” they write in their book. “Your dreams need real roadmaps.”

Douglas is a certified financial planner, the president of Bone Fide Wealth in New York and a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council. Heather, Bone Fide Wealth’s director of business and legal affairs, is a writer and former corporate attorney.

The interview below has been edited and condensed for clarity.

‘When there is scarcity, you see shame rear its head’

Annie Nova: You guys write that couples fight about money, no matter how much or little they have of it. Why do you think that is?

Heather Boneparth: Because money is more than money. Some of the emotions we tie to money include love, safety, independence, trust, control — and that’s true for people from any socioeconomic background. But when there is scarcity, you see shame rear its head in different ways. You also see partners in conflict over what constitutes acceptable ways to earn or borrow money, which might relate back to your culture or how you were raised.

AN: Heather, you describe realizing that your decision to borrow $200,000 in student debt was a huge mistake. But having Doug as a partner helped you find a way out. How so?

HB: Debt can feel like a perpetual reminder that you are lacking; not just in money, but in other ways, too. But Doug co-signed the loan to refinance my student loan debt. Knowing what an emotional impact the debt had on me, this was a more sweeping gesture than almost anything a partner could have done. He was saying, “Your burdens are my burdens.”

“Money Together” by Heather and Douglas Boneparth

Courtesy: Heather and Douglas Boneparth

AN: You also write that you “cringe” at the idea of being saved. Why is that, and what does it have to do with entering your 40s?

HB: I don’t like the idea of having saviors and those who need saving in relationships. It lays the foundation for a disparate power dynamic. Often, it implies that the partner who needed saving could not save themselves, and that partner begins to believe it. They believe that they don’t have the skills or knowledge to participate in the household finances, when that’s simply not true.

When I mention my age here, it’s more to demonstrate that a lot can change in a decade. I’ve built my confidence back, brick by brick. 

‘Making room’ for your partner’s money perspectives

AN: You write about how important it is “to make room” for your partner. What does this mean from a financial perspective?

HB: Some of our deepest feelings around money stem from our individual backgrounds. Now, try marrying those beliefs and behaviors with someone else’s. It’s not easy, and we don’t always take the time to understand enough about our partner’s underlying feelings around money and why they do what they do. That’s how you end up in recurring arguments about surface-level issues like a credit card bill rather than getting to the root cause of why you and your partner have differing views around lifestyle and spending. 

I think “making room” from a financial perspective means making room at the table for your partner’s financial beliefs, goals, appetite for risk and opinions about how you save, spend and invest.

AN: What are the risks of failing to talk about money together, and even hiding things from your partner?

Doug Boneparth: Resentment and a breakdown of trust. When you hide financial details from your partner, whether it’s debt, spending habits, or something you’re just embarrassed about, it never stays hidden forever. Having to explain something uncomfortable later only makes it harder to deal with.

‘Talk about money without talking about money’

AN: How early on should a couple start to talk about money?

DB: The earlier, the better. But that doesn’t mean you have to dive right into the numbers. Imagine talking about that on a third date? Not cool. But there are so many ways to talk about money without talking about money. You can learn a lot by asking questions about someone’s past, like what their childhood was like, where they are from and what they value.

AN: What do you think is the ideal arrangement for a married couple to share their money? Joint or separate accounts? And why?

DB: I’ve found that joint accounts for managing household expenses work best. It promotes transparency and teamwork. When both partners can see what’s coming in and going out, it reinforces that you’re in this together. That said, there’s nothing wrong with keeping your own individual checking accounts, too. Maintaining your sense of financial autonomy can be really healthy.

Using ‘financial fairness’ to navigate imbalances

AN: How can couples navigate a big difference in wealth or income between them? 

DB: You can’t bridge that gap if you don’t first acknowledge it. But when one partner earns or has more, unspoken assumptions can creep in. That’s where disparate power dynamics can calcify. Instead, Heather and I write about “financial fairness.” Fairness means you both feel respected and seen for what you value individually and as a couple. One person might earn more while the other contributes in different but equally meaningful ways, like managing the home, raising kids and planning for the future.

AN: What are some of the couple discussions that need to happen around family wealth and inheritances? What about when there is also an imbalance here, with, say, one person standing to inherit a large amount and another partner nothing? 

DB: Conversations around family wealth and inheritance can be tricky because they’re rarely just about money. They can carry a lot of grief and expectations. The best thing couples can do is treat inherited wealth as part of a shared conversation. Talk about what that money represents, what boundaries you want around it and how it fits into your long-term goals together.

AN: There’s a lot of headlines in the news lately about layoffs. How can couples best respond when one person loses their job?

HB: You don’t want to offer solutions too fast to your partner when they might still be reeling from their job loss. For some, losing your job can feel like losing your identity or your power. Those are heavy feelings that need some space to breathe. But of course, you do need to eventually address what transitions or accommodations might need to take place in your lives due to a loss of income.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

$20,000 Caution Bond Requirement for US Visa Applications imposed on 50 Countries

Published

on

The United States Department of State has officially implemented a revised visa policy introducing a mandatory posting requirement for caution payments of up to $20,000 on select foreign travel applications. Under the updated regulatory framework, consular officials are authorized to require temporary nonimmigrant visa applicants from targeted foreign countries to post a refundable financial bond of $20,000 as a condition for visa issuance. The policy mechanism is designed to address diplomatic concerns regarding high overstay rates among temporary visitor, business, and educational visa categories.

The caution bond pilot program applies selectively to foreign nationals from designated countries whose diplomatic entities record historical visa overstay rates exceeding established federal thresholds. Under administrative guidelines published by the State Department, the full financial deposit is posted directly to a dedicated federal escrow account prior to final visa issuance. The entire caution payment is automatically refunded to the applicant upon verified proof of timely departure from the United States in strict compliance with the authorized duration of stay. Conversely, failure to depart within the legal timeframe results in full forfeiture of the posted financial bond to the United States government.

Diplomatic representatives and travel policy experts have expressed varying perspectives regarding the operational implementation of the caution bond system. Administration officials emphasize that the measure serves as an effective, market-based incentive to enforce international travel compliance and preserve domestic immigration security standards. However, international trade organizations and foreign diplomatic missions have raised concerns regarding the financial burden imposed on legitimate business travelers, foreign students, and commercial partners from developing nations.

The United States finalized the rule to make the temporary visa bond program permanent, taking effect on August 3, 2026. The updated permanent regulation replaces the prior 12-month pilot, eliminates the lowest $5,000 tier, and raises the maximum required bond amount to $20,000 for specific B-1/B-2 business and tourist visa applicants.

Here is the list of the 50 countries on the list as o August 3, 2026

African Nations (31 Countries)

  • Algeria
  • Angola
  • Benin
  • Botswana
  • Burundi
  • Cabo Verde (Cape Verde)
  • Central African Republic
  • Côte d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast)
  • Djibouti
  • Ethiopia
  • Gabon
  • The Gambia
  • Ghana
  • Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Lesotho
  • Malawi
  • Mauritania
  • Mauritius
  • Mozambique
  • Namibia
  • Nigeria
  • São Tomé and Príncipe
  • Senegal
  • Seychelles
  • Tanzania
  • Togo
  • Tunisia
  • Uganda
  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe

Asian & Eastern European Nations (11 Countries)

  • Bangladesh
  • Bhutan
  • Cambodia
  • Georgia
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Mongolia
  • Nepal
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Tajikistan
  • Turkmenistan
  • Uzbekistan

Caribbean & Latin American Nations (5 Countries)

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Cuba
  • Dominica
  • Grenada
  • Venezuela

Oceanian Nations (3 Countries)

  • Fiji
  • Tonga
  • Vanuatu

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Next-Generation Retirement Planning: Managing Longevity Risk and Variable Income Streams

Published

on

Retirement planning strategies are evolving in 2026 to address increased life expectancies, shifting dynamic market conditions, and the transition away from traditional defined-benefit pensions. Individual investors and financial advisors are abandoning rigid retirement models in favor of flexible, multi-asset strategies designed to mitigate longevity risk and preserve purchasing power over multi-decade retirement horizons.

Mitigating Longevity Risk with Dynamic Asset Allocation
As average life expectancies extend past eighty-five years, one of the primary financial risks facing retirees is outliving their accumulated wealth. Traditional fixed income allocations—such as the standard 60/40 equity-to-bond portfolio—are being reevaluated to ensure portfolios generate sufficient capital growth alongside reliable income.

Financial planners recommend maintaining a meaningful equity allocation throughout retirement to offset long-term inflation erosion. High-dividend equity funds, global real estate investment trusts (REITs), and inflation-indexed Treasuries are combined to create diversified portfolios that deliver both growth and income stability.

The Transition to Dynamic Withdrawal Strategies
The classic “4% safe withdrawal rule” is increasingly replaced by dynamic withdrawal strategies that adapt annually based on market performance. Under a dynamic withdrawal framework, retirees adjust their annual distribution rates within pre-set caps and floors:
– Market Upside: During strong market returns, retirees can increase discretionary spending or fund family legacy gifts.
– Market Downturns: During market pullbacks, spending distributions are temporarily reduced to prevent sequence-of-returns risk and preserve core investment principal.

Guaranteed Lifetime Income Options and Deferred Annuities
To establish a guaranteed baseline for essential living expenses, individuals are incorporating modern fixed-indexed and deferred longevity annuities into their broader retirement architectures. Modern annuity structures offer competitive return caps, transparent fee schedules, and inflation-adjustment options.

By funding essential expenses—such as housing, healthcare, and insurance—with guaranteed income streams from Social Security, pensions, and annuities, retirees can manage discretionary investment portfolios with greater flexibility and lower emotional stress during market volatility.

Actionable Steps for Future Retirees
1. Calculate Baseline Retirement Expenses: Determine fixed living costs and map guaranteed income sources to cover essential expenditures.
2. Adopt Flexible Withdrawal Rules: Implement dynamic spending rules to protect investment principal against market downturns.
3. Incorporate Inflation-Protected Assets: Maintain exposure to dividend-growing equities and inflation-indexed bonds to safeguard long-term purchasing power.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Building Generational Wealth: Family Governance, Estate Tax Optimization, and Asset Protection

Published

on

As the largest intergenerational transfer of wealth in history accelerates, high-net-worth families, entrepreneurs, and individual investors are placing heightened emphasis on comprehensive estate planning, family governance, and asset protection. Preserving capital across generations requires a balanced approach combining tax-efficient legal structures with open family communication and financial literacy education.

Optimizing Estate Tax Exemptions and Trust Structures
With potential modifications to federal estate tax exemption thresholds on the horizon, proactive estate planning is essential for high-net-worth households. Estate planning attorneys and wealth advisors are establishing multi-generational trust structures to transfer wealth efficiently while minimizing estate and gift tax exposure.

Popular structural strategies include:
– Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs): Utilizing life insurance proceeds to provide liquidity for estate tax obligations without expanding the taxable estate.
– Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs): Transferring rapidly appreciating assets to beneficiaries with minimal gift tax consequences.
– Dynasty Trusts: Preserving wealth across multiple generations while providing long-term asset protection from creditor claims and legal liabilities.

Establishing Family Governance and Financial Education
Legal and financial structures alone cannot guarantee long-term wealth preservation without effective family governance. Financial advisors report that a significant percentage of multi-generational wealth dissipation stems from lack of communication and inadequate financial preparation among heir generations.

Families are establishing formal family governance frameworks, including periodic family meetings, written mission statements, and structured philanthropic foundations. Involving younger family members in charitable grant-making and investment discussions fosters financial stewardship and prepares heirs to manage family assets responsibly.

Digital Asset Custody and Legacy Planning
In today’s modern economy, estate planning must extend beyond physical real estate and traditional brokerage accounts to encompass digital assets. Comprehensive estate plans now include detailed inventories and legal access protocols for corporate domain names, intellectual property, digital media rights, and cryptocurrency holdings.

Fiduciaries and estate executors should be provided with secure, encrypted access mechanisms and clear legal authority to manage and transfer digital holdings in accordance with the owner’s estate directions.

Practical Steps for Legacy Planning
1. Review and Update Estate Documents: Ensure wills, revocable trusts, and power-of-attorney designations accurately reflect current family structures.
2. Establish Structured Trusts: Utilize irrevocable trusts to protect assets from creditors and minimize future estate tax liabilities.
3. Create a Digital Estate Inventory: Document access protocols and legal permissions for all online accounts, intellectual property, and digital assets.

Continue Reading

Trending