Connect with us

Accounting

How Trump and Congress may pay for TCJA extension

Published

on

Financial advisors and their clients know that the expiring parts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will likely remain in place, but they could be waiting until the end of the year on the details.

Regardless of their views of eight key policy questions outlined in the slideshow below and on President Donald Trump and his Republican party’s control of Congress and the White House, planners and other tax and wealth management professionals face the need to get ready for new potential rules. That’s why it’s important to look past the daily headlines emanating from Capitol Hill to the big themes.

Currently, the House and the Senate are tying each other up in the complicated process of agreeing to a budget resolution setting a target for revenue and spending that includes tax legislation and other priorities for this session of Congress, according to experts like Jonathan Traub, a managing principal and the leader of the Tax Policy Group at consulting and professional services firm Deloitte Tax. They must reach an understanding on their budget blueprint before moving on to legislation meeting those price figures. 

President Trump has expressed more support for the House’s plan to pass “one big, beautiful bill” covering taxes and immigration, but the Senate is lining up behind two pieces of legislation — which Trump has described as an acceptable option as well.

“I understand his perspective, which is, ‘I will weigh in on the policy, but that’s their ballfield. I’m not going to play on their turf,'” Traub said, noting the delays among Republicans seeking to find common ground on the budget resolution. “The longer that goes on, in my mind it ends up backing you into a two-bill strategy. At some point, if they’re working on parallel tracks that never meet, the president’s going to be frustrated by the lack of action.”

The tax policy dilemma that is converging on Trump and his party revolves around thorny math and politics that don’t pose many easy answers. The legislation will expand the deficit by several trillions of dollars and add to the country’s debt — even if its supporters wish to think that tariffs or corresponding economic gains will wipe away the cost completely. Simultaneously, other ideas such as cutting out tens of billions of dollars worth of tax enforcement programs signed into law by Trump’s predecessor, President Joe Biden, is “actually a revenue-loser as opposed to a revenue-raiser,” said Mary Burke Baker, a government affairs counselor and the leader of the Tax Policy practice of law firm K&L Gates.

As a former “keeper of the offset list” with the Senate Finance Committee, Burke Baker pointed out that this process is a very difficult one for any party on a major bill. 

“Some offset is going to affect somebody, and that makes it extremely challenging to come up with acceptable offsets that have any money attached to them that they can use to help pay for this bill,” she said.

It’s no wonder that some earlier forecasts before President Trump took office that the tax legislation would pass by May are now looking flimsy for a Congress with a very slim Republican majority in the House. By congressional standards, completing the tax legislation by Memorial Day would represent a very speedy process — almost unthinkably so.

“It will really involve all Republican lawmakers just following neatly in line with President Trump,” said Joe Hughes, a senior analyst for the nonprofit, nonpartisan Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, which provides “data-driven recommendations to shape equitable and sustainable tax systems.” As much as they do support Trump, many of the Republican ranks aim to reduce the deficit spending in the tax bill, Hughes noted. 

“No matter how you slice it up, it will be a very costly bill and have enormous impact on the federal deficit and debt,” he added. 

Even as some in Congress show that they’re willing to pretend that extending the Trump tax law somehow costs zero dollars, that budget gimmick could sign them up for a rendezvous with so-called bond vigilantes who have economy-tanking high interest rates in their holsters. Altering the baseline of the federal budget with “funny math” by counting current tax laws as costing nothing “would make a lot of people mad,” said Ben Henry-Moreland, a former planner who’s a senior financial planning nerd with the Kitces.com blog.

“It all depends on what sort of will and political pressure there is to pass these tax cuts,” he said. “If there’s a will to do that, they’re going to find a way.”

Scroll down the slideshow below for eight key tax policy issues for financial advisors and tax professionals to consider in the extension of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. To read the other part of Financial Planning’s tax-season feature on the math and politics shaping clients’ plans for next year, see “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expiration: A guide for financial advisors.” And click on the “tax” tag to see all of FP’s coverage of tax-related topics for advisors.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending