Connect with us

Accounting

IASB unveils financial performance standard

Published

on

The International Accounting Standards Board has introduced a new standard to give investors more readily comparable information about companies’ operating profits in one of the biggest changes to International Financial Reporting Standards in decades, making it harder for businesses to manipulate their financial results.

The new standard, IFRS 18, “Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements,” aims to help investors make better investment decisions and will affect all companies using IFRS accounting standards. 

“IFRS 18 represents the most significant change to companies’ presentation of financial performance since IFRS accounting standards were introduced more than 20 years ago,” said IASB chair Andreas Barckow in a statement Tuesday. “It will give investors better information about companies’ financial performance and consistent anchor points for their analysis.”

Barckow-Andreas-IASB.jpg

Andreas Barckow

The new standard introduces three sets of new requirements to improve companies’ reporting of financial performance and give investors a better way to analyze and compare companies and how they’re doing. It’s seen as an alternative to metrics such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which can be prone to manipulation when reporting on profit and loss.

The changes won’t necessarily affect U.S. companies, which mainly use U.S. GAAP, but multinationals that have operations abroad could be required to report their financial results using the new standard, especially if their shares trade on foreign exchanges. They will still be able to report on EBITDA, but only in the footnotes, according to Reuters.

The new standard aims to improve comparability in the statement of profit or loss on the income statement. The IASB noted that currently there’s no specified structure for the income statement, so companies can just pick their own subtotals to include. Companies will often report that they have an operating profit, but the way operating profit is calculated varies from company to company, and that reduces comparability. ‘

IFRS 18 introduces three defined categories for income and expenses — operating, investing and financing — with the goal of improving the structure of the income statement and requiring all companies to provide new defined subtotals, including operating profit. The improved structure and new subtotals aim to give investors a consistent starting point for analyzing corporate performance and make it simpler to compare one company to another.

The new standard also aims to improve the transparency of management-defined performance measures. Many companies report company-specific measures, which are often referred to as alternative performance measures (similar to non-GAAP metrics in the U.S.). Investors can find such information useful, but most companies don’t currently offer enough information to allow investors to understand how those measures are calculated and how they relate to the required measures in the income statement. IFRS 18 will require companies to disclose explanations of those company-specific measures that are related to the income statement. The new requirements aim to improve the discipline and transparency of management-defined performance measures, and make them subject to audit.

The new standard will also require a different kind of grouping of information within the financial statements. IFRS 18 includes enhanced guidance on how to organize information and whether to provide it in the primary financial statements or in the notes. The changes are expected to supply more detailed, useful information to investors. IFRS 18 also requires companies to offer more transparency about their operating expenses to help investors find and understand the needed information.

IFRS 18 takes effect for annual reporting periods starting on or after Jan. 1, 2027, although companies can apply it earlier. The IASB noted that changes in companies’ reporting resulting from the new standard will depend on their current reporting practices and IT systems.

The board has posted a short video on YouTube with Barckow explaining some of the changes. Support to implement IFRS 18 will be available via the implementation webpage, and additional resources are available on the project pages.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tax-slashing ETF trailblazer preps for a fresh $5B haul

Published

on


Four years after handling the first conversion of a hedge fund to an ETF, Wes Gray is gearing up to lead a surge of tax-busting deals aimed at investors.

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC withdraws accounting guidance on crypto assets

Published

on

The Securities and Exchange Commission has rescinded a Staff Accounting Bulletin on safeguarding cryptocurrency assets that had been criticized by the industry and even by some of its own commissioners. 

In Staff Accounting Bulletin 122, the SEC essentially withdrew some of the interpretive guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, which had been issued in 2022. The move is another sign of a more crypto friendly environment in the Trump administration. Trump has named Paul Atkins, a former SEC commissioner who has been a strong crypto proponent, as the next SEC chairman after the departure on Inauguration Day of Gary Gensler, who had led an enforcement crackdown on the industry.

SAB 121 had provided guidance for companies holding crypto assets on the risks they faced, including technological, regulatory and legal risks, and how they should account for their obligations to safeguard crypto assets for their users, along with the disclosures they should provide to the SEC staff. The guidance said companies should present a liability on their balance sheet to reflect their obligation to safeguard the crypto assets held for their users.

The new Staff Accounting Bulletin, SAB 122, rescinds the interpretive guidance and says an “entity that has an obligation to safeguard crypto-assets for others should determine whether to recognize a liability related to the risk of loss under such an obligation, and if so, the measurement of such a liability, by applying the recognition and measurement requirements for liabilities arising from contingencies” citing the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s standard on loss contingencies, as well as an applicable international accounting standard. The rescission could be done on a fully retrospective basis in annual periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2024, or companies can elect to effect the rescission in any earlier interim or annual financial statement period included in filings with the SEC after the effective date of the latest SAB. The guidance says entities should include clear disclosure of the effects of a change in accounting principle upon initial application of this rescission.

The original Staff Accounting Bulletin had drawn opposition in Congress, with both the Senate and House voting to repeal it last year. However, President Biden soon vetoed the bill.

SEC commissioner Hester Peirce has opposed the Staff Accounting Bulletin. She was named Monday to head a new crypto task force at the SEC by acting chair Mark Uyeda and posted on X about the withdrawal. “Bye, bye SAB 121! It’s not been fun,” she wrote, linking to the new Staff Accounting Bulletin.

A banking group also praised the move. “We welcome the SEC’s decision to rescind Staff Accounting Bulletin 121,” said Paige Pidano Paridon, senior vice president and co-head of regulatory affairs at the Bank Policy Institute, in a statement. “Today’s decision restores banks’ ability to serve as a trusted and secure option for clients that choose to custody digital assets.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Shipping and mishandling

Published

on

Noted once more; a lot of shingles; refund’s in the mail; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Shipping and mishandling

Orlando, Florida: Arthur Grimes, of Ocoee and Orlando, Florida, has been sentenced to 21 months in prison for obstructing the IRS in connection with his use of the “Note Program,” a tax fraud.

From 2015 to 2018, Grimes was a client of a scheme promoted by Jasen Harvey and Christopher Johnson which involved Harvey and Johnson filing returns for clients that claimed that large non-existent withholdings had been paid to the IRS and that sought refunds based on those withholdings.

Grimes caused four false income tax returns prepared by Harvey to be filed that sought refunds totaling $627,587, of which the IRS paid some $270,000. When the IRS tried to recover a refund issued to Grimes based on one of those returns, Grimes made false statements and submitted false documents to an IRS revenue officer and transferred funds to a nominee bank account.

Harvey and Johnson previously pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the IRS and have been sentenced to prison.

Grimes was also ordered to serve a year of supervised release and to pay some $238,973 in restitution to the United States.

Hillsville, Virginia: Business owner Timothy Agnew has pleaded guilty to filing returns underreporting his income from his construction company.

He owned and operated Red Hill Construction, which repaired and installed roofs, remodeled homes and built home additions. Between 2017 and 2021, Agnew filed personal returns that substantially underreported his gross receipts and income from the company; he omitted more than $2 million in gross receipts earned from construction projects for which the customers did not directly report those payments to the IRS through 1099s.

Agnew caused a tax loss to the IRS of more than $375,000.

Sentencing is April 3. He faces up to three years in prison, as well as a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties. 

Green Bay, Wisconsin: Business owner Douglas Larson has pleaded guilty to failure to truthfully account for and pay over federal employment taxes.

Larson owned and operated Mods International, later known as Mods Client Services, which manufactured and installed residential and commercial buildings out of shipping containers. Late last year, the U.S. government alleged that Larson had failed to pay over some $396,082.77 in employment taxes for each quarter from January 2018 through September 2021.

Parties agreed in the plea agreement that Mods and a related company that Larson owned and operated failed to pay over employment taxes that they’d withheld, as well as employment taxes they owed before and after the period above. The total tax loss agreed to was $1,102,805.13.

Sentencing is April 4. Larson faces up to five years in prison and up to a $250,000 fine. He also faces up to three years of supervised release after any prison term.

Missoula, Montana: Guy S. Cook, of Dripping Springs, Texas, owner of a business that operated in Belgrade, has pleaded guilty to tax evasion.

The government alleged that from about January 2014 to November 2021 in Belgrade, Cook tried to evade paying income taxes for 2014 and 2015.

He owned Bacterin International, which developed clinical medical laboratories. In 2014, Cook sold his shares in the company and obtained $2,467,176 in capital gains. He reported this income in 2014 and 2015, including taxes due totaling $643,884. Cook did not pay these amounts to the IRS, though his tax preparer told him he was required to do so.

Between 2017 and 2021, Cook took steps to avoid paying his taxes, including using business bank accounts and a company credit card to pay more than $300,000 of his personal expenses and debts; using nominee bank accounts to remove more than $380,000 from his business for personal use; and converting more than $600,000 in his salary to stock in his business.

Cook faces up to five years in prison, a $100,000 fine and three years of supervised release.

Hands-in-jail-Blotter

Sewell, New Jersey: Jose Camilo Perez Jr. has admitted to evading more than $3.4 million in taxes.

Perez controlled a company that digitized medical records for hospitals and other health care entities. From 2016 through 2023, the business received more than $8 million for its services. Perez tried to evade assessment of federal income taxes by cashing checks payable to the business at a check cashing business rather than depositing those checks into the business bank account or his personal bank account; he used the cash for personal expenses and to pay payroll.

From 2016 through 2023, he did not report to the IRS any of the income he received from the business. As a result, Perez evaded income taxes of more than $3.4 million.

The tax evasion charge carries a maximum of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Sentencing is May 20.

Roanoke, Virginia: Herman Estes has pleaded guilty to real estate and tax fraud related to his scheme to obtain a $1.3 million area home.

He pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud and filing false claims against the United States.

In March 2023, after filing a false amended 2021 income tax return claiming he was entitled to a refund of $18.3 million, Estes made a $1.3 million cash offer for a property and provided a proof-of-funds letter that he’d merely created using an online form. He also provided the real estate agent with contact information for his co-conspirator, purportedly his trust manager who had authority to approve the offer.

As payment for the property, Estes tendered a fraudulent cashier’s check that he had signed in the amount of $1,307,199.43, purportedly drawn on the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Funds in that amount were debited to the settlement company’s trust account before the check was identified as fraudulent.

In March 2023, Estes filed another false return claiming he was entitled to a $2.9 million refund.

Estes faces up to 20 years in prison for the wire fraud conspiracy, wire fraud and mail fraud counts, up to 30 years for bank fraud and up to five years for the false claims counts, plus additional potential penalties related to the commission of these offenses while released on bond. He also faces a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.

Providence, Rhode Island: Former personal injury attorney Peter P.D. Leach has been sentenced to 33 months in prison, to be followed by two years of supervised release for wire fraud and tax evasion.

At the time of his guilty plea, Leach admitted that he forged client signatures and deposited client settlement checks into his attorney IOLTA account, using those funds to pay personal expenses and to repay earlier clients whose funds he had embezzled. Leach repeatedly lied to clients about the status of their cases and told them that he would pay their medical expenses and other bills with settlement funds he’d received.

Leach also admitted that from 2014 to 2019 he took multiple steps to conceal his gains from the IRS, including by making false statements on IRS forms regarding his assets; making false statements to revenue officers about his ability and willingness to pay his taxes and about his withdrawal of more than $540,000 cash from his IOLTA accounts for payment of personal expenses; and by transferring money from his client account to the account of family members to make personal payments.

He was also ordered to pay restitution to his victims totaling $299,774.41. In a separate restitution matter, the court is expected to enter an order that Leach pay $320,622.76 to the IRS, representing taxes he failed to pay to the agency.

Continue Reading

Trending