Connect with us

Accounting

IASB unveils financial performance standard

Published

on

The International Accounting Standards Board has introduced a new standard to give investors more readily comparable information about companies’ operating profits in one of the biggest changes to International Financial Reporting Standards in decades, making it harder for businesses to manipulate their financial results.

The new standard, IFRS 18, “Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements,” aims to help investors make better investment decisions and will affect all companies using IFRS accounting standards. 

“IFRS 18 represents the most significant change to companies’ presentation of financial performance since IFRS accounting standards were introduced more than 20 years ago,” said IASB chair Andreas Barckow in a statement Tuesday. “It will give investors better information about companies’ financial performance and consistent anchor points for their analysis.”

Barckow-Andreas-IASB.jpg

Andreas Barckow

The new standard introduces three sets of new requirements to improve companies’ reporting of financial performance and give investors a better way to analyze and compare companies and how they’re doing. It’s seen as an alternative to metrics such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which can be prone to manipulation when reporting on profit and loss.

The changes won’t necessarily affect U.S. companies, which mainly use U.S. GAAP, but multinationals that have operations abroad could be required to report their financial results using the new standard, especially if their shares trade on foreign exchanges. They will still be able to report on EBITDA, but only in the footnotes, according to Reuters.

The new standard aims to improve comparability in the statement of profit or loss on the income statement. The IASB noted that currently there’s no specified structure for the income statement, so companies can just pick their own subtotals to include. Companies will often report that they have an operating profit, but the way operating profit is calculated varies from company to company, and that reduces comparability. ‘

IFRS 18 introduces three defined categories for income and expenses — operating, investing and financing — with the goal of improving the structure of the income statement and requiring all companies to provide new defined subtotals, including operating profit. The improved structure and new subtotals aim to give investors a consistent starting point for analyzing corporate performance and make it simpler to compare one company to another.

The new standard also aims to improve the transparency of management-defined performance measures. Many companies report company-specific measures, which are often referred to as alternative performance measures (similar to non-GAAP metrics in the U.S.). Investors can find such information useful, but most companies don’t currently offer enough information to allow investors to understand how those measures are calculated and how they relate to the required measures in the income statement. IFRS 18 will require companies to disclose explanations of those company-specific measures that are related to the income statement. The new requirements aim to improve the discipline and transparency of management-defined performance measures, and make them subject to audit.

The new standard will also require a different kind of grouping of information within the financial statements. IFRS 18 includes enhanced guidance on how to organize information and whether to provide it in the primary financial statements or in the notes. The changes are expected to supply more detailed, useful information to investors. IFRS 18 also requires companies to offer more transparency about their operating expenses to help investors find and understand the needed information.

IFRS 18 takes effect for annual reporting periods starting on or after Jan. 1, 2027, although companies can apply it earlier. The IASB noted that changes in companies’ reporting resulting from the new standard will depend on their current reporting practices and IT systems.

The board has posted a short video on YouTube with Barckow explaining some of the changes. Support to implement IFRS 18 will be available via the implementation webpage, and additional resources are available on the project pages.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending