Connect with us

Accounting

IIA protests GAO budget cuts

Published

on

The Institute of Internal Auditors expressed its opposition to efforts to slash the funding of the Government Accountability Office nearly in half.

Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee have proposed steep budget cuts for the GAO, reducing its budget from about $812 million for fiscal year 2025 to $415 million in fiscal year 2026. The proposed cuts would severely affect the GAO’s ability to uncover financial waste and fraud, and a number of organizations have written to congressional leaders to protest the proposed budget cuts, including the IIA. The Senate Appropriations Committee has since rejected the proposal to halve the GAO’s budget, but the GAO has nevertheless faced pressure to curtail some of its watchdog activity.

“For more than a century, GAO has served as a pillar of good governance responsible for providing Congress with ‘timely information that is objective, fact-based, nonpartisan, nonideological, and balanced,'” said a letter from IIA  president and CEO Anthony Pugliese earlier this month. “Through comprehensive audits and evaluations, the dedicated professionals at GAO promote a more efficient federal government by identifying waste, enhancing performance, and safeguarding taxpayer dollars.” 

“Given GAO’s essential role in equipping Congress with objective analysis to ensure government accountability, The IIA is increasingly concerned by recent attempts to politicize the agency through unfounded accusations,” he continued. “While it is certainly appropriate for public officials to question or disagree with GAO, such comments misleadingly suggest that the agency has abdicated its core mission to pursue a political agenda. Unfortunately, specious allegations against public sector auditors are proliferating across North America. Officials frequently dismiss audit findings as ‘political’ rather than engage constructively or implement difficult recommendations. 

“This changing environment risks undermining the ability of public sector auditors, such as GAO, to safeguard public resources,” he added. “For example, on June 26, 2025, the U.S. House Committee on Appropriations approved its version of the FY26 Legislative Branch Appropriations Act that, if enacted, would cut GAO’s budget by approximately 50%. Such a substantial reduction in appropriations will prevent Congress from obtaining objective and timely information regarding pertinent government programs. Moreover, it will place taxpayer resources at risk of waste, fraud, and abuse.” 

“As leaders of the U.S. House subcommittee with legislative jurisdiction over GAO, The IIA urges you to reject political expediency and stand in strong support of GAO,” said the letter. “Specifically, we encourage you to utilize your committee leadership positions to oppose efforts to drastically cut funding for GAO in FY 2026.”

Other groups have also written to congressional leaders to express their opposition to the GAO funding cuts.

The GAO has come under pressure from the Trump administration after opening a series of investigations into whether the administration illegally withheld billions of dollars in congressionally approved funds, according to the New York Times.

“We issued a letter under my name to Congress criticizing the decision to defund the GAO,” Pugliese told Accounting Today in an interview last week. “Not many people took a stand on it. I’m not thinking we’re going to have the weight of the U.S. government come down on us because I have a slight disagreement with a 50% reduction in GAO’s funding. But we’ve gone the opposite way of DOGE, I guess. Don’t cut, at least don’t touch the watchdogs.”

“The administration says they’re not efficient and they’re not effective and there’s zero evidence as to either,” Pugliese added.

The head of the GAO, comptroller general Gene Dodaro wrote his own letter objecting to the budget cuts.

“Our work is congressionally-driven and reflects congressional committees’ highest priorities. Specifically, about 95 percent of our audit work is mandated or requested by Congress,” Dodaro wrote in June. “This occurs by Congress including provisions in statute or conference and committee reports requiring GAO reviews or by committee leadership requesting GAO conduct a review. The remaining five percent of our work is conducted under the Comptroller General’s authority and largely focuses on work supporting our high-risk list (a long standing, bipartisan body of work), budget justification reviews for the Appropriations Committees, and technology assessments—all areas of significant interest to Congress. All our legal decisions flow from our statutory responsibilities or are requested by Members of Congress.” 

Pugliese noted that he regularly meets with Dodaro on many things, the current head of it. “I’m not out there auditing what he does per se, but I think what they do is rather focused and efficient, to be quite frank. They find a lot. They’re nonpartisan. The fact that maybe his affiliation is with one party or the other shouldn’t translate into his job, and it doesn’t from what I can tell.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending