Connect with us

Accounting

IIA protests GAO budget cuts

Published

on

The Institute of Internal Auditors expressed its opposition to efforts to slash the funding of the Government Accountability Office nearly in half.

Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee have proposed steep budget cuts for the GAO, reducing its budget from about $812 million for fiscal year 2025 to $415 million in fiscal year 2026. The proposed cuts would severely affect the GAO’s ability to uncover financial waste and fraud, and a number of organizations have written to congressional leaders to protest the proposed budget cuts, including the IIA. The Senate Appropriations Committee has since rejected the proposal to halve the GAO’s budget, but the GAO has nevertheless faced pressure to curtail some of its watchdog activity.

“For more than a century, GAO has served as a pillar of good governance responsible for providing Congress with ‘timely information that is objective, fact-based, nonpartisan, nonideological, and balanced,'” said a letter from IIA  president and CEO Anthony Pugliese earlier this month. “Through comprehensive audits and evaluations, the dedicated professionals at GAO promote a more efficient federal government by identifying waste, enhancing performance, and safeguarding taxpayer dollars.” 

“Given GAO’s essential role in equipping Congress with objective analysis to ensure government accountability, The IIA is increasingly concerned by recent attempts to politicize the agency through unfounded accusations,” he continued. “While it is certainly appropriate for public officials to question or disagree with GAO, such comments misleadingly suggest that the agency has abdicated its core mission to pursue a political agenda. Unfortunately, specious allegations against public sector auditors are proliferating across North America. Officials frequently dismiss audit findings as ‘political’ rather than engage constructively or implement difficult recommendations. 

“This changing environment risks undermining the ability of public sector auditors, such as GAO, to safeguard public resources,” he added. “For example, on June 26, 2025, the U.S. House Committee on Appropriations approved its version of the FY26 Legislative Branch Appropriations Act that, if enacted, would cut GAO’s budget by approximately 50%. Such a substantial reduction in appropriations will prevent Congress from obtaining objective and timely information regarding pertinent government programs. Moreover, it will place taxpayer resources at risk of waste, fraud, and abuse.” 

“As leaders of the U.S. House subcommittee with legislative jurisdiction over GAO, The IIA urges you to reject political expediency and stand in strong support of GAO,” said the letter. “Specifically, we encourage you to utilize your committee leadership positions to oppose efforts to drastically cut funding for GAO in FY 2026.”

Other groups have also written to congressional leaders to express their opposition to the GAO funding cuts.

The GAO has come under pressure from the Trump administration after opening a series of investigations into whether the administration illegally withheld billions of dollars in congressionally approved funds, according to the New York Times.

“We issued a letter under my name to Congress criticizing the decision to defund the GAO,” Pugliese told Accounting Today in an interview last week. “Not many people took a stand on it. I’m not thinking we’re going to have the weight of the U.S. government come down on us because I have a slight disagreement with a 50% reduction in GAO’s funding. But we’ve gone the opposite way of DOGE, I guess. Don’t cut, at least don’t touch the watchdogs.”

“The administration says they’re not efficient and they’re not effective and there’s zero evidence as to either,” Pugliese added.

The head of the GAO, comptroller general Gene Dodaro wrote his own letter objecting to the budget cuts.

“Our work is congressionally-driven and reflects congressional committees’ highest priorities. Specifically, about 95 percent of our audit work is mandated or requested by Congress,” Dodaro wrote in June. “This occurs by Congress including provisions in statute or conference and committee reports requiring GAO reviews or by committee leadership requesting GAO conduct a review. The remaining five percent of our work is conducted under the Comptroller General’s authority and largely focuses on work supporting our high-risk list (a long standing, bipartisan body of work), budget justification reviews for the Appropriations Committees, and technology assessments—all areas of significant interest to Congress. All our legal decisions flow from our statutory responsibilities or are requested by Members of Congress.” 

Pugliese noted that he regularly meets with Dodaro on many things, the current head of it. “I’m not out there auditing what he does per se, but I think what they do is rather focused and efficient, to be quite frank. They find a lot. They’re nonpartisan. The fact that maybe his affiliation is with one party or the other shouldn’t translate into his job, and it doesn’t from what I can tell.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending