Connect with us

Accounting

Ineligible ITIN holders claim millions in tax credits

Published

on

People with Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers are claiming millions of dollars in tax credits for which they’re not eligible, according to a new report.

Processing Content

The report, released by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, found that for tax years 2023 and 2024, 45,386 returns claimed about $172 million in tax credits that ITIN holders were not eligible to receive, including $142.8 million in refundable tax credits such as the Earned Income Tax Credit.

The Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act (PATH Act) of 2015 requires TIGTA to conduct an audit of the ITIN Program every two years. For the report, TIGTA evaluated the efficiency and effectiveness of the program to ensure only individuals with a tax need were assigned an ITIN. The PATH Act also prohibits taxpayers from retroactively claiming certain credits for any year that the taxpayer, spouse or dependent lacks a valid ITIN issued on or before the due date of the return.

An ITIN is a nine-digit number issued by the IRS to individuals who have a federal tax need to have a Taxpayer Identification Number but aren’t eligible for a Social Security number, such as immigrants. However, individuals who can get an ITIN include but aren’t necessarily limited to foreign individuals who receive U.S. wages or dividends or sell U.S. property.

As of October 2025, the IRS has issued approximately 31 million ITINs since the program’s inception in 1996. The agency issued 469,888 ITINs in 2025. Individuals with an ITIN can claim and receive tax credits, depending on eligibility. ITINs expire after three years of consecutive nonuse. There were 5 million active ITINs as of last October.

visualization

The IRS has systemic processes to administer the ITIN program, but in some cases, ITIN holders have received tax credits even when they’re ineligible. 

TIGTA’s review found 294 tax returns claimed more than $637,000 in tax credits that were ineligible because the taxpayer or qualifying individual (such as a dependent) did not have a Social Security number. Of the $637,000 claimed, $303,000 was the refundable portion allowed by the IRS. 

In addition, 45,092 tax returns retroactively claimed about $171.7 million in tax credits. The IRS allowed $142.5 million for the refundable portions on 1,488 tax returns where taxpayers did not have an ITIN originally issued on or before the due date of the tax return, and on 43,604 tax returns where the taxpayers’ ITINs expired before the tax return due date. 

The IRS didn’t agree with TIGTA, however, that it erroneously allowed credits on the 43,604 tax returns that retroactively claimed credits after the expired ITINs were renewed. The agency noted that it followed guidance in Notice 2016-48 that says the issuance date of a renewed ITIN is the original ITIN issuance date, not the renewal date. 

TIGTA believes the guidance could have been clearer on this point. “The IRS could have protected $138.8 million in Processing Years 2023 and 2024 if guidance was more aligned with the PATH Act’s intent to prevent retroactive claims for credits,” said the report. 

The report noted the IRS is planning to modernize the processing of ITIN applications by allowing taxpayers to self-authenticate their documents and electronically submit their applications, but that’s contingent upon information technology resources and other priorities across the agency, which has been going through a series of budget and staffing cuts over the past year that have significantly reduced its technology modernization plans

TIGTA also found that since September 2019, the IRS has not completed any on-site compliance reviews of its certifying acceptance agents who help people in the application process and are authorized to authenticate identification documentation. The IRS indicated that these reviews were delayed due to a lack of resources and aren’t mandatory. 

TIGTA made six recommendations in the report, including reviewing and making corrections for the tax returns where the IRS allowed credits for ITIN holders who were ineligible, and updating guidance to consider the ITIN renewal date as the issuance date, when applicable. The IRS agreed with all of TIGTA’s recommendations.

Last year’s tax law reduced many tax breaks for non-citizens.

“We are implementing significant procedural and programming changes under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, which provides more stringent requirements for taxpayers claiming certain credits,” wrote Kenneth Corbin, chief of the Taxpayer Services Division at the IRS, in response to the report. “Specifically, beginning in tax year 2025, when claiming the Child Tax Credit and Additional Child Tax Credit, taxpayers and their dependents must have a valid Social Security number, authorized for work, and issued before the due date of their return. The same SSN requirement will apply to American Opportunity Tax Credit beginning in tax year 2026. We remain committed to improving program integrity, ensuring compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements, and reducing taxpayer burden while maintaining effective oversight of ITIN processing.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending