Connect with us

Accounting

Internal auditors expand their scope

Published

on

The internal audit profession has been grappling with a greater array of responsibilities beyond checking up on corporate finances, including vetting companies’ cybersecurity and use of artificial intelligence.

The Institute of Internal Auditors has been introducing what it calls “Topical Requirements,” starting with cybersecurity and moving onto other topics, in addition to rolling out an updated set of Global Internal Audit Standards, which took effect in January

“The next one is called organizational behavior, aka culture,” said IIA president and CEO Anthony Pugliese. “Culture doesn’t translate the same in every part of the world, and even in the U.S. Sometimes people think culture just means, do people like working there? That is a part of it, but it’s not the part we focus on. We focus on the culture’s attunement to risk, and tolerance of risk, and how they approach risk. We look at whether employees are happy, but that all plays into whether they’re comfortable reporting risks and reacting to risks. That’s very important since the pandemic, with all the supply chain issues that are coming out of tariffs and things like that.”

Internal auditors now find themselves dealing with risks of various kinds. “The internal audit profession is operating in one of the most complex environments in its history,” said Richard Chambers, a senior advisor on risk and audit at the technology company AuditBoard and former president and CEO of the IIA. “We’re battling a shrinking talent pipeline, falling short on IT expertise, and navigating new regulatory changes, all while trying to keep pace with emerging risks that evolve faster than most audit plans can track.”

The IIA has been expanding globally as the profession seeks more talent. “We admitted Cameroon in Africa, and we also admitted Georgia in Eastern Europe into the federation,” said Pugliese. “There are different levels of admission. When you’re a global chapter, that just means you’re loosely organized, and you’re doing some things to help the profession, and we support it. But when you rise to the level of a national institute, that’s when you get the official name, like IIA Georgia, IIA Cameroon. Those two countries hit the benchmarks of growth and numbers and governance in place.” 

The IIA has now grown to about 270,000 members around the world, he added. It’s part of COSO, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, along with the American Institute of CPAs, the American Accounting Association, Financial Executives International and the Institute of Management Accountants. In May, COSO and the National Association of Corporate Directors released an exposure draft of a proposed Corporate Governance Framework, but in July decided to withdraw it, citing the shifting regulatory and economic landscape for U.S. businesses after passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

“There was a sense of, did it expose too much liability to organizations that followed it?” said Pugliese “And that’s a good question to ask. That’s not the intention, to cause an organization to get sued because they followed guidance from COSO. So it was more like, let’s pull it so we can think about that and then put it back out.”

He said the proposed framework seemed to hit a soft spot, but he predicts it will re-emerge eventually.

The auditing profession has been evolving steadily over the years. “I have witnessed an enormous amount of change in the time that I’ve been a part of this profession,” said Chambers. “In the early years, the imperative that auditors pursued is what I’ve referred to as hindsight. We were very much focused on what happened in the past — what happened last year, last week, last month, were the controls designed and implemented effectively, was there accountability? It was always about looking in the rear-view mirror.”

Internal auditors are providing more forward-thinking advice to their organizations. “Throughout the latter half of the 20th century, auditors began to focus not just on hindsight, but giving a more contemporary perspective — not just looking at what happened, but looking at what is happening,” he added. “That’s what we start to talk about auditors providing insight. Continuing to look behind us, but also looking around us to provide perspectives, assurance and advice while it’s still timely enough to make a difference.”

Auditors need to offer fresh perspectives as they eye the future. “In today’s regulatory environment, auditors are increasingly being called upon to provide foresight,” said Chambers. “This is where we begin to look forward — to anticipate risks, identify emerging trends, and provide strategic advice that helps our organizations become more resilient and agile. Foresight doesn’t mean forecasting the future with certainty, but it does mean leveraging the right data and technology and our understanding of risk to help the organization be better prepared for what might lie ahead.”

Companies need to be more forward-looking now as they face risks beyond just ensuring Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. “Audit and SOX are a component of overall enterprise risk,” said AuditBoard CEO Raul Villar Jr. “Our goal is to connect risk across the enterprise, and we believe we’re uniquely suited to do that. We have a huge base of really loyal customers.”

Like the IIA, AuditBoard has been expanding into areas such as cybersecurity and governance. “If you just think about some of the hottest topics that we read about every day — cybersecurity, AI governance — these are topics that the largest companies in the world are looking to AuditBoard, saying, ‘How can we create this enterprise risk assessment for all these topics and include these?'” said Villar. “This is what their boardroom is looking for. What’s going on with cybersecurity at the firm? What’s going on with AI? How are we governing the tools? How are we enabling our employees to leverage it, but protecting the firm? Because it’s a new technology. The people we work with, the larger companies, are actually more conservative than smaller companies. They’re taking a really cautious posture, but they’re looking for guidance.”

Over half of Fortune 500 companies use AuditBoard, Villar noted, including seven of the largest 10 companies in the world. 

Regulatory changes and new standards

Regulatory changes have been affecting the auditing profession and influencing its future direction. “The regulatory landscape has shifted and as a result, so has the auditing profession,” said Chambers. “We’re seeing heightened scrutiny around ESG reporting, cybersecurity oversight, fraud risk and AI governance, all of which are redefining the scope and complexity of what auditors are expected to assess. For the future of the auditing profession, this means transformation is not optional; it’s essential. Auditors must embrace continuous learning, develop fluency in new and emerging risk areas, and integrate trusted AI into their workflows.”

The changes have been one reason why the IIA decided to update its Global Internal Audit Standards. “We had something similar before, but in 2021, after I started, we decided it was time for a wholesale rewrite, not because the old ones were wrong,” said Pugliese. “They were simply outdated, and not all in the technical ways, but more in the approaches that we wanted our members to take, like more active communications with boards, almost to the point of saying you need to talk to your board or audit committee, and if you cannot, then you need to document the reasons why.”

The IIA wanted to introduce the concept of public interest as part of its standards. “We believe we also act in the public interest, although in a less direct way than external auditors,” said Pugliese. “We still provide boards the data they need to lead governance within an organization.”

So far, the updated standards have been well received by IIA members. “We really did see a great reaction, because we wanted to position them to help members with all the challenges they were facing, and as best we could stand the test of time and not need to be rewritten next year,” said Pugliese. “I think we hit the balance. We’ll keep our eyes and ears open, but they became required in January. We had a full year implementation period, and we’re hearing good things about it.”

AI’s role in audit

Internal auditors are starting to leverage artificial intelligence as a tool for evaluating companies. 

“I believe more audit leaders will invest in AI in today’s regulatory climate,” said Chambers. “The volume, velocity and variety of data that auditors must assess have grown exponentially. Manual approaches are no longer sufficient.”

AuditBoard has been making more use of AI as well. “Clearly our platform today is infused with AI throughout,” said Villar. “It’s a huge opportunity for us to simplify some of the mundane tasks that auditors have to use today. Our ability to enable them to streamline those activities is really helpful on the risk side.  We are really encouraging our clients to treat AI like any other risk within the company. Everywhere they use AI in the organization, what are the controls that they’re measuring and managing? Where’s the data coming from? That’s probably the most important thing, ensuring data integrity. We saw some early missteps with AI, so we want to make sure you know that our clients are taking into account all the different regulations, but ensuring that they understand where the data is coming from. We provide them the framework to do that, and they treat it like another major risk element across the firm.

The role of the auditor is likely to continue evolving in the years ahead. “Over the next few years, the role of the internal auditor will evolve dramatically — from a traditional focus on hindsight to becoming a forward-looking, tech-enabled strategic partner,” said Chambers. “As regulatory demands around ESG, cybersecurity, and AI governance intensify, auditors will be expected to anticipate emerging risks, deliver real-time insights, and contribute directly to organizational resilience. With data analytics and AI becoming core to audit operations, audit professionals will need to master new technologies while cultivating deep business acumen and agility. This transformation also demands a shift in perception—from compliance enforcers to value creators and trusted advisors. The auditors of the future must be continuous learners, tech-literate thinkers, and proactive communicators who help shape strategy, foster stakeholder trust, and navigate uncertainty with confidence.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Trending