Connect with us

Accounting

IPOs for Andersen and others in limbo during shutdown

Published

on

SEC building with official seal

The long-awaited IPO revival is poised to slow if the ongoing U.S. government shutdown lingers, putting billions of dollars worth of deals on hold.

Initial public offerings for companies ranging from travel software startup Navan Inc. to Andersen Group Inc., the tax and advisory firm led by former partners of the firm that collapsed as a result of the Enron scandal, are left in limbo as the Securities and Exchange Commission remains largely shuttered. These companies are among the handful of listing candidates that could’ve begun formally marketing their deals to investors as soon as Monday.

Instead, with no deal to end the congressional impasse on the horizon, industry lawyers are advising their IPO clients to sit tight. Yet a shutdown that drags on for weeks or months would derail carefully choreographed listing timetables. Worse, a lengthy dispute could halt a stock market that’s rallied to a string of records — and supported a rebound in deal volume.

“If this is a couple weeks at most, I don’t think we’ll see too much to worry about,” said Dave Peinsipp, co-chair of Cooley’s global capital markets practice. “If it takes a month or longer or goes into 2026, then we’ve got some real problems — but we’re not there yet.”

IPOs have been humming along, with $33.4 billion raised in the U.S. through October 5, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That’s already above the total raised in all of 2024. Washing machine maker Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. and University of Phoenix owner Phoenix Education Partners Inc. have approval from regulators to go public this week, in what could be the last notable IPOs for however long the dispute over funding the government lasts.

Any extension of a shutdown would threaten to hold up companies that targeted going public before next month’s Thanksgiving holiday, with the window before year-end holidays offering only a narrow time frame to push through deals.

The likes of Navan, Andersen Group and BitGo Holdings Inc. filed for IPOs earlier in September, making them the first to be impacted by the SEC not being able to declare registrations effective. Ethos Technologies Inc., Beta Technologies Inc., and Once Upon a Farm PBC are still in the middle of a 15-day waiting period before they can begin formal marketing.

Companies that want to go public before the Nov. 27 holiday but that aren’t yet publicly on file have until about Oct. 28, in order to fulfill a 15-day holding period and leave time for a week of marketing, lawyers say. For these firms, the shutdown starts to have a real impact if it stretches past the first full week of October.  

“Clients who are going through IPOs are concerned about how long it might last and are trying to come up with game plans if it lasts longer than a few days,” said John Ericson, a partner at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. “It’s tight just because there are limited windows from here to the end of the year to actually execute, just for market purposes.”

Risk of pullback

The calendar issues aren’t simply about logistics. For dealmakers, every day that they can’t get listing paperwork approved increases the risk of a market pullback that could kill the sentiment that’s been helping carry IPO volume closer to pre-pandemic norms.

The S&P 500 Index closed at another record and has returned more than 15% this year, and a closely watched gauge of small stocks is just shy of a September all-time high, as investors pile into anything related to artificial intelligence and cryptocurrencies.

Further delays would open up companies to the threat of investors having distractions like quarterly earnings — which will ramp up next week — as well as closely watched economic data and what could prove to be a pivotal Federal Reserve decision on Oct. 29. 

People are excited about the types of companies going public right now, and deals have been “firing almost on all cylinders,” said Lowenstein Sandler partner Daniel Forman. “An extended shutdown could cool a lot of the momentum that’s in the IPO market right now.”

U.S. IPOs have so far weathered more than their share of volatility. Dealmaking bounced back from the shock imposition of tariffs in April, and many of the listings delayed during that episode have since been completed. Still, after years of waiting for confidence to return, the industry is all too aware of how easily it can vanish.

“We’re absolutely on a week-to-week basis and have been for 2025,” said Cooley’s Peinsipp. “The margin of error gets smaller when you take away a couple weeks that otherwise looked pretty good.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending