Connect with us

Accounting

IRS contingency plan for government shutdown unclear

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service’s contingency plans for a government shutdown are currently unknown, with the web page for the most recent plan from last December returning an error message as of Friday afternoon.

Former IRS acting commissioner Doug O’Donnell, who is now a senior managing director of KPMG’s Washington national tax practice, discussed the possibilities during a LinkedIn Live session on Thursday afternoon moderated by Brittany Hardin Tanguay, a senior manager in KPMG’s Washington national tax practice. O’Donnell retired from the IRS in February amid a wave of staffing cuts and disputes over sharing taxpayer information with the U.S. DOGE Service before he joined KPMG in July. He worked for 38 years with the IRS, and prior to becoming deputy commissioner, he was commissioner of the Large Business and International division for six years. That coincided with a 35-day shutdown between December 2018 and January 2019.

Now the IRS is facing the prospect of a government shutdown at midnight on Oct. 1 if Senate Republicans and Democrats can’t agree on a compromise to pass a continuing resolution to keep the government running. 

“There is not a ton of communication that goes on about where the budget is and what’s happening and what the IRS is planning with respect to a potential lapse,” said O’Donnell. “That is not inconsistent with the past. This is basically an MO for the IRS and most federal government agencies. Those decisions on what to say and when to say it are largely managed by senior members of the administration. In the case of the IRS, it was [the Office of Management and Budget], and then the Treasury Secretary, so that’s not unlike what it’s been in the past. So the fact that the plan is not out, and there’s not a lot of chatter about what’s happening, that is consistent with the past. In my experience, there’s a reason for that, and it’s largely due to their not wanting to be a signal by the agencies themselves that they know something about what’s happening, because they don’t. That’s all being worked at a very different level.”

The Treasury Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the latest contingency plans. But the IRS is no doubt preparing for the possibility of a shutdown. “There’s this legal framework around government spending, and the Anti-Deficiency Act basically says you can’t spend that which you don’t have,” said O’Donnell. “If you don’t have appropriated funds of some manner, the agencies can’t operate. And in the instance of the IRS, if there’s a budget lapse, what ends up happening is that there are a number of activities that are not considered to be essential, and those activities do not continue. And it’s important to understand what those are. And it’s useful to have what the contingency plan is that the agency puts together, because they’ll spell out what those activities are, the numbers of people that will be available, and the services that will be available.”

He noted that it can be a very fluid environment. “In my experience at the agency we made sure that there were new people that were coming into the planning process for the contingency plan, so that we were thinking about what has changed in the agency,” said O’Donnell. “A plan to respond to a lapse could look the same from year to year, but typically there are differences.”

It will be important for tax professionals to reassure their clients and colleagues during any shutdown. “I think for the clients of KPMG, for our colleagues at KPMG, understanding what’s actually happening and what it may mean is super important, just so that you can manage expectations, your own or those you work with, because it does evolve over time,” said O’Donnell. “If it lasts more than a couple of hours, one does need to be paying attention to what does this mean? What do I need to do? How should I respond? And how should we be thinking about what could happen if this goes longer than we may have thought originally?”

The duration of the shutdown will be key. “There are times where the lapse of the budgets will run up till midnight on a day, and at that point, if there’s no funding, then operations would halt,” said O’Donnell. “Frequently in most government agencies, certainly the IRS, once you get past the end of the normal workday, there are not a ton of people that are working in any event. There are the campuses where returns are processed and accounts are adjusted, but typically, the majority of employees are not going to be working. And so if, if there were a lapse that occurred at, say, 12:01 a.m., and it were resolved by 6 a.m. that would be a blip. You’d read about it, you’d hear about it, but the effects would be very minimal. When it’s a couple of days out, it depends on what your frequency of interaction is with the agency. If you’re involved in something where there’s been an ongoing effort to try to resolve a question or a challenge or an account issue, and that person is no longer available, that becomes difficult, because managing that without somebody being available can be very difficult. And so there does begin to be a greater impact to taxpayers, to tax professionals, if it runs longer.”

During the 35-day lapse from December 2018 to January 2019, the lapse actually lasted until the beginning of the tax filing season. “There were impacts that at the outset were minimal, not even really considered,” said O’Donnell. “But as time went on, it was a very different scenario.”

IRS leadership conducted daily calls to decide what to do. “Some of these issues that we wouldn’t normally worry about, we need to start talking about, and we need to be thinking about whether our plan for only having 30% of the workforce, or 40% of the workforce in, does that work?” said O’Donnell. “And then that turns into a communication with Treasury Department, who will be working with the Office of Management and Budget to understand whether there’s any flexibility, because that which we thought was essential for a day is one thing, but when you get out a week or two weeks, it becomes a very different matter, and that’s something that leadership will know about and will be prepared for. And there are leaders at the IRS who have been through this, and do appreciate that if something were to happen, the pivot to this is not an hour or a day, it’s something more than that. They do have experience with that and how to make the case for allowing additional folks to be involved in some of the work. It doesn’t turn everything back on, but some of the things that you need to make sure you do that are essential to the operation of the IRS that they will be turned back on.”

Accounting Today asked about where the contingency plan could be. “I’ve been looking around and poking,” said O’Donnell. “I can’t find an official updated version, but my sense is that there will be an updated version, because that’s an ongoing exercise. It’s done by top level leadership to take a look at the programs across the board. And it’s a heavy lift initially, and then it’s got to be a close read by the different operational components to understand what might be happening, what’s different about the way we’re operating now than last year, and so that’s an ongoing effort to update.”

Accounting Today also asked about the staffing cuts at the IRS and how those would affect the shutdown. President Trump and White House Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought have threatened mass firings of federal employees in the event of a shutdown, although the IRS was forced to backtrack and bring back many employees who had been laid off earlier this year after finding it could not operate without them.

“They lost a significant number of people through the Deferred Resignation Program and other reductions in force, and they then have moved to hire and there’s also this offer for people that did take the Deferred Resignation Program to come back,” said O’Donnell. “We don’t know how many, and we don’t know the classes of employees, and we don’t know how many accepted it, but there is a move to make sure that there is some rebuild of the staff, but they’ve got to get in and get trained up, and that’s got to happen before they can do some of this work that I was talking about, like answering phones, staffing walk-ins, adjusting accounts. And so it all begins to work together in terms of the environmental challenges that the Service is going to face that are primarily focused on the individual work. But this affects entities large and small, because anything that they may need to do to interact with and the professionals that represent them to interact with the IRS is going to be in the same bucket of demand that everything else is, where we’ve got this environment with new provisions, a lot of new people, fewer people, and in a relatively challenging environment, so that the Service is going to be thinking about this very carefully, about how to best position. They could make an argument that some of these activities that would not normally be considered essential could be categorized as essential.” 

The IRS will need to train employees about the new tax law as it tries to rehire staff. “We’re in an interesting period here in the United States where there’s an effort to hire,” said O’Donnell. “It was reported in late August, roughly 3,500 employees, which seem to be mostly in the customer service space, will be coming in to do this work where typically phones are being answered, amended returns are being processed, accounts are being adjusted, and those folks will need to be trained for a much longer period. That typically takes three-plus months to bring them up to speed.”

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act adds new complications. “And then there are the folks that need to be trained in the new tax law, which, this year there was significant change to provisions for tax year 2025 that affect millions of individuals: the overtime, the tips, the deduction of interest on automobiles,” said O’Donnell. “That is a bit nuanced. And there’s other provisions, but those are going to affect large numbers of individuals that don’t have access to, for example, a KPMG to help them navigate. And that will spike demand for assistance, and that’s going to come at a time where there may be fewer people, and there may be fewer people that have the deep level of expertise that may have existed before the 6,000 or so employees in the customer service representative space did leave, and actually a number of them that took the Deferred Resignation Program, the majority of them will leave payroll September 30. They’ve not been working since the middle of May. So there’s a lot that’s going on in that space. And then if you get into the filing season, there’s a completely different set of decisions that need to be made. We are now in the really primary season for the IRS. Processing returns and taking in payments are two of the essential functions that the IRS has. The good thing for the IRS, for the United States, frankly, is that most individual returns, like 95 or 96% of the individual returns, are filed electronically. So that process happens, it works, but there are still paper returns that are coming in.”

The IRS will need to communicate in the event of a shutdown. “If there is a lapse, there will be communications that will be out there about what what functions are on and which ones are off,” said O’Donnell.

“Managing expectations becomes really important, and that’s on the part of the IRS and for their employees, understanding what’s going to happen,” he added. “They know when they come back to work if there is a lapse that there are a lot of things that need to be turned back on, that need to be restarted. Even when there is a lapse that ends, if it’s longer than a couple of days, turning things back on is not an inconsequential challenge, and it’s something to keep in mind. So I think it’s really important to pay attention to what the IRS puts out. They’ll put things out on irs.gov. There will still be people that will be working. There will be communications at some level coming out. There are a lot less comms coming out of the IRS than there have been in the past, so it’s a little bit difficult to understand precisely where things stand. But in that type of an environment, if there’s a lapse, there’s definitely going to be an awareness of what’s happening, of what it means, and how to be prepared for it.”

Hardin Tanguay summed it up. “The IRS has been here before,” she said. “There are playbooks for shutdowns. Essential operations will go on, how those are defined will meet the needs of the moment, but taxpayers should potentially expect a slower service on everything else in the event that we do face a shutdown. The key is to stay informed and continue meeting your tax obligations as normal.”

O’Donnell said taxpayers and tax professionals should continue to file. “Make sure you’re doing the things we normally do, to file, to make the payments, keep your records, pay attention to how things are evolving, and make sure for us, we’ll be communicating within the firm and then sharing that information with clients, but It’s going to be really important for all of us to just keep track of what’s happening,” he said. 

The National Treasury Employees Union is urging a resolution before the shutdown. “Hardworking Americans deserve better than the current chaos in Washington,” said NTEU national president Doreen Greenwald in a statement Thursday. “We elect leaders to work together to ensure government provides the necessary services effectively and efficiently for its citizens. Instead of the parties working together, we face another potential government shutdown. This is politics at its worse, using the federal budget as a game of chicken with federal employees as the collateral damage. Again. And this time even more so with the Administration’s latest illegal threat of mass layoffs if the government shuts down. This needs to stop. We must expect more from the government and stand with federal employees so they can continue to provide the services we rely on and are not used as political pawns. We all need to call on Congress and the Administration to do their jobs. The mandate is clear: Negotiate a bipartisan deal to fund the government so that services continue and taxpayer dollars are not wasted by a shutdown that serves no one.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending