Connect with us

Accounting

IRS contingency plan for government shutdown unclear

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service’s contingency plans for a government shutdown are currently unknown, with the web page for the most recent plan from last December returning an error message as of Friday afternoon.

Former IRS acting commissioner Doug O’Donnell, who is now a senior managing director of KPMG’s Washington national tax practice, discussed the possibilities during a LinkedIn Live session on Thursday afternoon moderated by Brittany Hardin Tanguay, a senior manager in KPMG’s Washington national tax practice. O’Donnell retired from the IRS in February amid a wave of staffing cuts and disputes over sharing taxpayer information with the U.S. DOGE Service before he joined KPMG in July. He worked for 38 years with the IRS, and prior to becoming deputy commissioner, he was commissioner of the Large Business and International division for six years. That coincided with a 35-day shutdown between December 2018 and January 2019.

Now the IRS is facing the prospect of a government shutdown at midnight on Oct. 1 if Senate Republicans and Democrats can’t agree on a compromise to pass a continuing resolution to keep the government running. 

“There is not a ton of communication that goes on about where the budget is and what’s happening and what the IRS is planning with respect to a potential lapse,” said O’Donnell. “That is not inconsistent with the past. This is basically an MO for the IRS and most federal government agencies. Those decisions on what to say and when to say it are largely managed by senior members of the administration. In the case of the IRS, it was [the Office of Management and Budget], and then the Treasury Secretary, so that’s not unlike what it’s been in the past. So the fact that the plan is not out, and there’s not a lot of chatter about what’s happening, that is consistent with the past. In my experience, there’s a reason for that, and it’s largely due to their not wanting to be a signal by the agencies themselves that they know something about what’s happening, because they don’t. That’s all being worked at a very different level.”

The Treasury Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the latest contingency plans. But the IRS is no doubt preparing for the possibility of a shutdown. “There’s this legal framework around government spending, and the Anti-Deficiency Act basically says you can’t spend that which you don’t have,” said O’Donnell. “If you don’t have appropriated funds of some manner, the agencies can’t operate. And in the instance of the IRS, if there’s a budget lapse, what ends up happening is that there are a number of activities that are not considered to be essential, and those activities do not continue. And it’s important to understand what those are. And it’s useful to have what the contingency plan is that the agency puts together, because they’ll spell out what those activities are, the numbers of people that will be available, and the services that will be available.”

He noted that it can be a very fluid environment. “In my experience at the agency we made sure that there were new people that were coming into the planning process for the contingency plan, so that we were thinking about what has changed in the agency,” said O’Donnell. “A plan to respond to a lapse could look the same from year to year, but typically there are differences.”

It will be important for tax professionals to reassure their clients and colleagues during any shutdown. “I think for the clients of KPMG, for our colleagues at KPMG, understanding what’s actually happening and what it may mean is super important, just so that you can manage expectations, your own or those you work with, because it does evolve over time,” said O’Donnell. “If it lasts more than a couple of hours, one does need to be paying attention to what does this mean? What do I need to do? How should I respond? And how should we be thinking about what could happen if this goes longer than we may have thought originally?”

The duration of the shutdown will be key. “There are times where the lapse of the budgets will run up till midnight on a day, and at that point, if there’s no funding, then operations would halt,” said O’Donnell. “Frequently in most government agencies, certainly the IRS, once you get past the end of the normal workday, there are not a ton of people that are working in any event. There are the campuses where returns are processed and accounts are adjusted, but typically, the majority of employees are not going to be working. And so if, if there were a lapse that occurred at, say, 12:01 a.m., and it were resolved by 6 a.m. that would be a blip. You’d read about it, you’d hear about it, but the effects would be very minimal. When it’s a couple of days out, it depends on what your frequency of interaction is with the agency. If you’re involved in something where there’s been an ongoing effort to try to resolve a question or a challenge or an account issue, and that person is no longer available, that becomes difficult, because managing that without somebody being available can be very difficult. And so there does begin to be a greater impact to taxpayers, to tax professionals, if it runs longer.”

During the 35-day lapse from December 2018 to January 2019, the lapse actually lasted until the beginning of the tax filing season. “There were impacts that at the outset were minimal, not even really considered,” said O’Donnell. “But as time went on, it was a very different scenario.”

IRS leadership conducted daily calls to decide what to do. “Some of these issues that we wouldn’t normally worry about, we need to start talking about, and we need to be thinking about whether our plan for only having 30% of the workforce, or 40% of the workforce in, does that work?” said O’Donnell. “And then that turns into a communication with Treasury Department, who will be working with the Office of Management and Budget to understand whether there’s any flexibility, because that which we thought was essential for a day is one thing, but when you get out a week or two weeks, it becomes a very different matter, and that’s something that leadership will know about and will be prepared for. And there are leaders at the IRS who have been through this, and do appreciate that if something were to happen, the pivot to this is not an hour or a day, it’s something more than that. They do have experience with that and how to make the case for allowing additional folks to be involved in some of the work. It doesn’t turn everything back on, but some of the things that you need to make sure you do that are essential to the operation of the IRS that they will be turned back on.”

Accounting Today asked about where the contingency plan could be. “I’ve been looking around and poking,” said O’Donnell. “I can’t find an official updated version, but my sense is that there will be an updated version, because that’s an ongoing exercise. It’s done by top level leadership to take a look at the programs across the board. And it’s a heavy lift initially, and then it’s got to be a close read by the different operational components to understand what might be happening, what’s different about the way we’re operating now than last year, and so that’s an ongoing effort to update.”

Accounting Today also asked about the staffing cuts at the IRS and how those would affect the shutdown. President Trump and White House Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought have threatened mass firings of federal employees in the event of a shutdown, although the IRS was forced to backtrack and bring back many employees who had been laid off earlier this year after finding it could not operate without them.

“They lost a significant number of people through the Deferred Resignation Program and other reductions in force, and they then have moved to hire and there’s also this offer for people that did take the Deferred Resignation Program to come back,” said O’Donnell. “We don’t know how many, and we don’t know the classes of employees, and we don’t know how many accepted it, but there is a move to make sure that there is some rebuild of the staff, but they’ve got to get in and get trained up, and that’s got to happen before they can do some of this work that I was talking about, like answering phones, staffing walk-ins, adjusting accounts. And so it all begins to work together in terms of the environmental challenges that the Service is going to face that are primarily focused on the individual work. But this affects entities large and small, because anything that they may need to do to interact with and the professionals that represent them to interact with the IRS is going to be in the same bucket of demand that everything else is, where we’ve got this environment with new provisions, a lot of new people, fewer people, and in a relatively challenging environment, so that the Service is going to be thinking about this very carefully, about how to best position. They could make an argument that some of these activities that would not normally be considered essential could be categorized as essential.” 

The IRS will need to train employees about the new tax law as it tries to rehire staff. “We’re in an interesting period here in the United States where there’s an effort to hire,” said O’Donnell. “It was reported in late August, roughly 3,500 employees, which seem to be mostly in the customer service space, will be coming in to do this work where typically phones are being answered, amended returns are being processed, accounts are being adjusted, and those folks will need to be trained for a much longer period. That typically takes three-plus months to bring them up to speed.”

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act adds new complications. “And then there are the folks that need to be trained in the new tax law, which, this year there was significant change to provisions for tax year 2025 that affect millions of individuals: the overtime, the tips, the deduction of interest on automobiles,” said O’Donnell. “That is a bit nuanced. And there’s other provisions, but those are going to affect large numbers of individuals that don’t have access to, for example, a KPMG to help them navigate. And that will spike demand for assistance, and that’s going to come at a time where there may be fewer people, and there may be fewer people that have the deep level of expertise that may have existed before the 6,000 or so employees in the customer service representative space did leave, and actually a number of them that took the Deferred Resignation Program, the majority of them will leave payroll September 30. They’ve not been working since the middle of May. So there’s a lot that’s going on in that space. And then if you get into the filing season, there’s a completely different set of decisions that need to be made. We are now in the really primary season for the IRS. Processing returns and taking in payments are two of the essential functions that the IRS has. The good thing for the IRS, for the United States, frankly, is that most individual returns, like 95 or 96% of the individual returns, are filed electronically. So that process happens, it works, but there are still paper returns that are coming in.”

The IRS will need to communicate in the event of a shutdown. “If there is a lapse, there will be communications that will be out there about what what functions are on and which ones are off,” said O’Donnell.

“Managing expectations becomes really important, and that’s on the part of the IRS and for their employees, understanding what’s going to happen,” he added. “They know when they come back to work if there is a lapse that there are a lot of things that need to be turned back on, that need to be restarted. Even when there is a lapse that ends, if it’s longer than a couple of days, turning things back on is not an inconsequential challenge, and it’s something to keep in mind. So I think it’s really important to pay attention to what the IRS puts out. They’ll put things out on irs.gov. There will still be people that will be working. There will be communications at some level coming out. There are a lot less comms coming out of the IRS than there have been in the past, so it’s a little bit difficult to understand precisely where things stand. But in that type of an environment, if there’s a lapse, there’s definitely going to be an awareness of what’s happening, of what it means, and how to be prepared for it.”

Hardin Tanguay summed it up. “The IRS has been here before,” she said. “There are playbooks for shutdowns. Essential operations will go on, how those are defined will meet the needs of the moment, but taxpayers should potentially expect a slower service on everything else in the event that we do face a shutdown. The key is to stay informed and continue meeting your tax obligations as normal.”

O’Donnell said taxpayers and tax professionals should continue to file. “Make sure you’re doing the things we normally do, to file, to make the payments, keep your records, pay attention to how things are evolving, and make sure for us, we’ll be communicating within the firm and then sharing that information with clients, but It’s going to be really important for all of us to just keep track of what’s happening,” he said. 

The National Treasury Employees Union is urging a resolution before the shutdown. “Hardworking Americans deserve better than the current chaos in Washington,” said NTEU national president Doreen Greenwald in a statement Thursday. “We elect leaders to work together to ensure government provides the necessary services effectively and efficiently for its citizens. Instead of the parties working together, we face another potential government shutdown. This is politics at its worse, using the federal budget as a game of chicken with federal employees as the collateral damage. Again. And this time even more so with the Administration’s latest illegal threat of mass layoffs if the government shuts down. This needs to stop. We must expect more from the government and stand with federal employees so they can continue to provide the services we rely on and are not used as political pawns. We all need to call on Congress and the Administration to do their jobs. The mandate is clear: Negotiate a bipartisan deal to fund the government so that services continue and taxpayer dollars are not wasted by a shutdown that serves no one.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending