Connect with us

Accounting

IRS ends Direct File program

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service has shut down its Direct File free tax-filing program, sending an email to the 25 states that offered it this year.

“IRS Direct File is now closed for Filing Season 2025,” wrote IRS product manager Cynthia Noe in an email to state comptrollers. “This includes the State API to export federal returns from IRS Direct File to integrated state filing tools, which is now disabled. Taxpayers will no longer be able to access their returns via directfile.irs.gov. They can access a summary of their return, also known as a transcript, online via their IRS Online Account, or a full copy of their return via mail by submitting Form 4506. IRS Direct File will not be available in Filing Season 2026. No launch date has been set for the future. Thank you for participating in IRS Direct File during Filing Season 2025, and for your collaboration and partnership to create a free, simple way for taxpayers to file their federal and state taxes.”

The email was sent to the state departments of revenue and technical points of contact for the 25 states participating in IRS Direct File for filing season 2025.

A message on the IRS’s Direct File page on Thursday now says, “Direct File is closed. More information will be available at a later date.”

Speculation about the shutdown of Direct File began spreading earlier this year after Elon Musk, who was heading the U.S. DOGE service, posted on X that he had “deleted” 18F, the digital services team that helped build the Direct File system ahead of its initial pilot test last year. 

The Direct File system expanded from pilot tests in 12 states last year to 25 states this year, aided by the nonprofit group Code for America and its FileYourStateTaxes project.  A survey of over 1,000 Direct File and FileYourStateTaxes users reportedly found that 98% of respondents said they were either satisfied or very satisfied with the programs, according to the Federal News Network. Last year, then-IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel announced plans to make the Direct File program permanent, but the program has been repeatedly attacked by Republican lawmakers in Congress and the tax prep industry.

Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., issued a statement slamming the closure. “If an opportunity presents itself to stick it to working people and drive up their costs for the benefit of giant corporations, you can count on the Trump administration to seize it,” he said in a statement Thursday. “Trump and Bessent had already gutted the team that ran the Direct File program, so the outcome of this study was predetermined and the report itself is a sham. I wrote the bill that created Direct File because the existing free options were insufficient and the big tax prep companies had been caught red-handed using deceptive practices to scam taxpayers into overpaying. The lesson is, the Trump administration is a threat to any public service that saves Americans time, hassle and money.”

An IRS spokesperson referred questions to state tax departments. A spokesperson for the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance told Accounting Today, “While Governor Hochul is working to make New York State more affordable, the Trump administration is actively choosing to eliminate programs that have saved taxpayers money. The Trump administration’s decision to kill the Direct File program shows how far they’ll go to put special interests over the needs of everyday Americans. During a time when inflation and the cost of living are already so high, programs like this should be preserved to help Americans keep more of their hard earned money.”

A Treasury Department spokesperson forwarded a link to a study released by the Treasury earlier this month on developing a replacement for Direct File. The study was mandated by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which had initially included a provision for terminating Direct File in the version of the bill passed by the House. The report seems to recommend that Direct File be shut down.

“American taxpayers have access to several options for free income tax return preparation and filing, including longstanding public-private partnerships and in-person volunteer programs,” it said in its executive summary.  “Under the prior Administration, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) created an option for eligible taxpayers to file their federal individual income tax return online directly with the IRS at no direct cost to the user. First launched as a pilot program for tax year 2023, Direct File was available to taxpayers in 12 states. At the conclusion of the pilot program, a total of 140,803 returns had been filed by users and accepted by the IRS. For tax year 2024, Direct File was available to taxpayers in 25 states, and, as of April 20, 2025, a total of 296,531 returns had been filed by users and accepted by the IRS. Direct File had low overall participation and relatively high costs and burdens on the federal government, compared to other free filing options. For tax year 2024, returns submitted using Direct File constituted less than 0.5 percent of the approximately 146 million returns filed. Direct File had a cost to the federal budget of at least $41 million for tax year 2024 returns, or a cost of at least $138 per return accepted through Direct File. Because not all agency support functions were included in the cost of Direct File, the $41 million understates the true costs of developing, administering, and supporting Direct File for tax year 2024. Direct File’s complexity and technical demands also diverted IRS resources from other core priorities. Meanwhile, successful, longstanding programs, such as Free File (which already covers a broader eligibility population than Direct File and operates at little cost to the government), were not fully promoted or optimized during this period.”

The IRS released the source code for Direct File on the programming site GitHub in June, enabling other developers to create similar programs, although they would still need to get access to the IRS and state portals. 

Last month, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration released a report that initially said, “”We are also evaluating whether the IRS met all legislative requirements to terminate Direct File (an IRS-developed free tax return preparation tool) and report to Congress on a potential replacement system,” although that was later revised by TIGTA to say, “We are also assessing if the IRS met all legislative requirements related to Direct File in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.”

Taxpayers will now need to look for other free alternatives.  “It’s so hard to talk about Direct File without politics,” said James Creech, a principal with Baker Tilly’s specialty tax practice. “I’m sad to see it go because I think it did a great job. It seemed like it offered a unique opportunity. You can file for free on TurboTax if you’re below the threshold. I’m sorry that program never got to explore its full potential.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending