Connect with us

Accounting

IRS falls behind on processing tax refunds for deceased taxpayers

Published

on

Between January 2021 and July 2024, the IRS processed nearly 610,000 manual refunds for deceased taxpayers, according to a recent report, but in many cases took over a year to process them.

The report, released earlier this month by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, comes at a time when Elon Musk and President Trump have been questioning billions of dollars in Social Security payments that are supposedly being sent to millions of long deceased centenarians, although the claims have been debunked by fact checkers. It’s not uncommon for the IRS to process tax returns for estates and recent decedents or for the Social Security Administration to have dead people still listed in its extensive database. The TIGTA report noted that a deceased taxpayer may be owed a tax refund from the IRS, for example, if they die before receiving a refund on a tax return they filed or if a tax return is filed on behalf of the deceased taxpayer. “Often a taxpayer’s surviving spouse, estate executor, or beneficiary files the tax return,” said the report. “In some cases, the IRS must issue the refund manually instead of systemically.”

The average processing time for those refunds was 444 days. The refunds included over $237 million in interest paid. 

That doesn’t mean the IRS hasn’t made mistakes in its handling of such refunds. TIGTA estimated that the IRS miscalculated the interest for over 47,500 claimants, resulting in the claimant receiving either too much or too little interest.

The report noted that the IRS is developing programming to either eliminate or significantly reduce the need for manual refunds for those who claim a deceased taxpayer’s refund beginning in the 2025 filing season. That programming may come under threat from budget and staffing cutbacks at the IRS that have prompted the agency to pause its technology modernization efforts, but it’s expected to be implemented in April. 

TIGTA also found the IRS has inadequate controls in place to verify that the interest calculated for manual refunds is accurate. From January 2021 through July 2024, the IRS issued 609,953 manual refunds associated with deceased taxpayers that included more than $237 million in interest. The report found the IRS miscalculated the interest paid to claimants in 12 out of a sample of 91 manual refunds issued (or 13%). TIGTA estimated that 47,542 claimants may have been affected by erroneous interest calculations and received either too much or too little interest owed. There’s a potential for human error in the manual refund process as it requires employees to manually enter the numbers on which interest is to be calculated. 

TIGTA made six recommendations to the IRS’s chief of taxpayer services to improve the processing of manual refunds associated with deceased taxpayers. Its recommendations included coordinating with the appropriate IRS offices and senior officials to expedite the approval, funding and implementation of a programming request to reduce the need for manual refunds. TIGTA also suggested the IRS should ensure the programming request has appropriate controls to accurately calculate interest owed to survivors or claimants; and provide additional guidance to IRS employees on deceased refunds to establish consistency in the processing of a survivor’s claims. The IRS agreed with all six of TIGTA’s recommendations. 

“Programming is expected to be implemented in April 2025 that will permit employees processing these refund claims to update accounts with the additional information identifying the representative of the decedent releasing the refund for systemic payment,” wrote Kenneth Corbin, chief of the IRS’s Taxpayer Services Division, in response to the report. “When this occurs, interest will be systematically calculated without employee action.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending