Connect with us

Accounting

IRS offers short window in R&D guidance

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service posted guidance just in the nick of time for some taxpayers on the treatment of research and experimentation expenses under the new tax law.

On Thursday, the IRS  released Revenue Procedure 2025-28, which instructs taxpayers on how to make various elections, file amended returns, or change accounting methods for research or experimental expenditures as provided under section 70302 of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, also known as Public Law 119-21. One of the provisions reverses a requirement under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 to amortize research and development costs over five years starting in 2022 and again allows them to be deducted immediately.

For a taxable year beginning during 2024 and ending prior to September 15, 2025, for which the due date (excluding any extension) for the return of tax for such taxable year was before September 15, 2025 (2024 taxable year), section 8 of the revenue procedure grants an automatic extension of time to file superseding tax and information returns applying the provisions of this revenue procedure. 

“The big issue is, if you use the lookback, can you pick and choose, starting in 2024 instead of having to go back to 2022,” said Bill Smith, managing director of the CBIZ National Tax Office. “The guidance essentially says you can do that, but the return has to be filed today or later. We have been giving the advice that, based on our reading of the statute, we thought you could do that, but if anybody actually filed, we also said you would be wise not to file your return early, because we might get guidance. But if anybody did that, they would need, just to be safe, to amend or supersede if they’re allowed to do that. But that’s 60 pages of guidance, and we’re just starting to crack it, but that was one of the most controversial issues for R&D under the OBBBA.”

The new guidance provides transitional rules, modifies Revenue Procedure 2025-23, List of Automatic Changes, and grants an extension of time for partnerships, S corporations, C corporations, individuals, estates and trusts, and exempt organizations to file superseding 2024 federal income tax returns. 

“In order to choose 2024 or 2023, if you want to do that, the return has to be filed today or later,” said Smith. “For some entities, that gives you roughly 18 days to make a decision to get your return filed.”

That’s counting about 18 days from the issuance of the revenue procedure on Aug. 28 until the Sept. 15, 2025. 

“We said on a call that we’ll probably get this guidance on Sept. 14 at 4:00,” said Smith. “I guess we should be thankful we got 18 days.”

The IRS has been facing a series of budget and staffing cuts that have strained resources this year, along with a series of departures of commissioners and acting commissioners. That has made it difficult to reach people at times, but with some exceptions such as the Independent Office of Appeals.

“If you’re just trying to call with a question, it’s pretty much a nightmare,” said Smith. “But if you’re in Appeals, for some reason, Appeals seems to be very responsive these days, even more than before. I don’t really know what’s driving that, but I’ve heard several instances confirming that Appeals officers are getting back even more quickly than they have in the past. The same for private letter rulings. Those groups seem to be in pretty good shape. I don’t know why. They lost people at every level.”

He’s been able to get private letter rulings within six months in some cases, as opposed to the two years that had been predicted. 

There are other areas where he believes the IRS will need to provide guidance on the OBBBA. 

“There’s a ton of things we’re waiting for guidance on,” said Smith. “Qualified production property is a huge deal because you basically get 100% depreciation on the real estate that you build if you satisfy the criteria. But no one’s certain about what the criteria are. For example, can you take the 100% depreciation if you expand or make additions to an existing structure? Or does that have to be a new stand-alone structure? A lot of people would like to expand. Even a reading of the Act itself doesn’t give you much ability to say yes or no, or we think this, or we think that. You’re really stuck waiting for guidance there, and again, there’s still people left to file by September 15. Entities are coming down to the wire on trying to figure some of this stuff out.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending