Connect with us

Accounting

IRS reduced workforce 11% so far, TIGTA reports

Published

on

More than 11,400 Internal Revenue Service employees have either received termination notices as probationary employees or voluntarily resigned, representing an 11% reduction to the agency’s workforce, according to a report released Monday by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. 

In February, the IRS had around 103,000 employees, but that number has dropped by about 11% due to a series of executive orders from President Trump since his inauguration in January and the downsizing instigated by the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency, also known as the U.S. DOGE Service. Specifically, 7,315 probationary employees received termination notices, according to the report, and 4,128 employees were approved to accept the Deferred Resignation Program, a voluntary buyout program offered by the Trump administration, which has been rolled out in phases to IRS employees amid court challenges and appeals. Another 522 employees are pending approval under the program.

Monday’s report was TIGTA’s first on IRS workforce reductions and it focuses on the probationary employees identified for termination and the employees who voluntarily participated in the initial Deferred Resignation Program. TIGTA plans to periodically update the report to highlight further reductions, including the impacts of the second Deferred Resignation Program and Reductions in Force. The DRP allowed federal employees to voluntarily resign with pay through Sept. 30, 2025.  

In conjunction with the reduction in force, the IRS is offering three voluntary separation programs: the Treasury Deferred Resignation Program will mirror the benefits of the first DRP offering; the Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment; and the Voluntary Early Retirement Authority. In April, the IRS extended the TDRP offer to its employees. According to the IRS, over 23,000 employees have applied for the TDRP, and 13,124 were approved as of April 22. 

The report includes a look at the IRS business units affected by the layoffs and voluntary departures. The separations disproportionately impacted employees in certain positions. For example, approximately 31% of revenue agents left the IRS under the program, while 5% of information technology management departed. Revenue agents conduct examinations and audits by reviewing the financial records of individuals and businesses to verify what is reported, and they can work in several IRS business units examining different types of taxpayers. 

The Tax-Exempt/Government Entities division lost 31% of its staff, representing 694 employees, while the Large Business and International division lost 25%, or 1,733 employees. The Small Business/Self-Employed division lost 23% of its staff, or 5,765 employees. In contrast, 7% of the Human Capital Office (207 employees), 5% of IT (450 employees) and 4% of taxpayer services (1,714 employees) were affected.

In March, a federal court ruled that the probationary employees needed to be reinstated. The IRS recalled the terminated employees but put them on paid administrative leave. There have since been various court cases challenging the terminations and reinstatements. “Currently, it is unclear what the final disposition will be for probationary employees who received termination notices.” 

Most of the 7,315 probationary employees who received termination notices had less than one year experience with the IRS, according to the report, and 6,669 employees had one year of service or less, while 615 employees had between one and five years of service, and 31 employees had more than five years of service. 

“The termination of probationary employees will have a greater impact on certain age groups within the IRS workforce,” said the report. The probationary employees who received termination notices tended to be under the age of 40, including 549 probationary employees who were less than 25 years old, representing 14% of all IRS employees in that age group. 

Various estimates have been given of the number of IRS employees who will ultimately be affected by the layoffs, ranging from about 20% to 50%. The budget proposal released last week by the Trump administration would cut $2.5 billion from the IRS budget, following on the heels of clawbacks of about half of the $80 billion in extra funding that was supposed to be provided to the IRS under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.

Amid all the turmoil this year, the IRS has also seen a number of high-profile departures, including former commissioner Danny Werfel and former acting commissioners Douglas O’Donnell, Melanie Krause and Gary Shapley.

Some former IRS employees and government accountants may be attractive hires by accounting firms and departments that need to fill their ranks amid the ongoing talent shortage.

“We’re certainly seeing more interest in the hiring of former IRS employees and government accountants in conversations we’re having with clients, and this tracks given the current talent shortage in both the finance and accounting fields,” said Kyle Allen, executive vice president of sales and recruiting for Vaco by Highspring, a recruiting and staffing firm. “These folks bring strong regulatory and audit experience to the table, and their insider knowledge of tax compliance is a big plus for private companies. They can often jump into roles like compliance or advisory work quickly, which is a huge benefit. It’s not a silver bullet for the talent gap, but having more qualified professionals in the mix is definitely a step in the right direction.” 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending