Accounting

IRS signals that IRA heirs should start RMDs

Published

2 years ago

August 7, 2024

The IRS has quashed any remaining hope that it would alter its new guidelines for inherited individual retirement accounts, ending the “stretch” strategy for most beneficiaries.

With its finding in rules issued last month that tax revenue-raising provisions of the 2019 Secure Act require so-called noneligible beneficiaries who have inherited IRAs in 2020 or later to transfer all the assets into their income within a decade, the IRS told financial advisors and their clients that there would be no more delays in implementation or a shift in the final statutes. That means beneficiaries must begin taking required minimum distributions next year — if they haven’t already started. But experts agree that it’s likely past time to initiate that process.

“Everyone thought there was a mistake. The longer we waited for the final regulations, the more the industry seemed to be thinking, ‘OK, they’re actually going to hold us to this,'” Heather Zack, the director of high net worth solutions with Waltham, Massachusetts-based wealth management firm Commonwealth Financial Network, said in an interview.

That said, the rules point to “a strategy that most advisors were taking already” in seeking to “equalize distributions over 10 years” rather than setting up a “tax bomb” by taking them all at once, she noted. “I don’t think there were many advisors who were telling their clients, ‘Let’s wait and take out everything in year 10.'”

The rules’ implications to retirement planning with “a tax component” merit a conversation with clients who inherited an IRA in any of the past four years, said Matthew Cleary, a financial planner with Wakefield, Massachusetts-based 401(k) and wealth firm Sentinel Group.

“We want to bring that up absolutely, because it may be a situation where you do want to have more of a schedule to minimize the tax burden of taking it out in one year,” Cleary said in an interview. “There are a couple of exceptions to that rule, but for the most part the stretch IRA is dead.”

Caveats to the new 10-year requirement apply to eligible designated beneficiaries — a group that includes the spouse of the deceased IRA owner, heirs who are chronically ill or disabled, and heirs younger than the late retirement saver by only a decade or less, Zack and Cleary noted. Another carve-out from the mandatory distributions applies to heirs who are 20 years old or younger, who can still use the stretch strategy until they are 21, according to a blog post by Sarah Brenner, director of retirement planning for IRA advice firm Ed Slott & Company. At that age, the new rules state that the beneficiary must launch their distributions and empty the accounts into their own income within the 10-year window.

In addition, the rules maintained the “controversial” provision that most beneficiaries are subject to the 10-year guideline — even if the account owner died on or after the beginning period for the holder’s own required minimum distributions, Brenner wrote in another blog.

“This rule requires annual RMDs to continue once they have started,” she wrote. “Many believed this rule went away with the Secure Act, but apparently the IRS thought differently. Due to all the confusion its interpretation caused, the IRS waived RMDs during the 10-year period for beneficiaries for the years 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024. In the newly released final regulations, the IRS is doubling down on its position that these annual RMDs are required. They must be taken starting in 2025. However, the IRS will not impose penalties for annual RMDs that were not taken for years before 2025.”

In its announcement, the IRS specifically discussed the concerns around that interpretation.

“Treasury and IRS reviewed comments suggesting that a beneficiary of an individual who has started required annual distributions should not be required to continue those annual distributions if the remaining account balance is fully distributed within 10 years of the individual’s death as required by the Secure Act,” the agency said in its July 18 press release. “However, Treasury and IRS determined that the final regulations should retain the provision in the proposed regulations requiring such a beneficiary to continue receiving annual payments.”

As part of his characteristically detailed social thread examining the tax impact of a newly released rule, Buckingham Strategic Wealth Chief Planning Officer and Kitces.com blog Lead Financial Planning Nerd Jeffrey Levine reported that finding as the answer to “the No. 1 question advisors have asked for 2+ years now,” adding, “Sorry, I don’t make the rules, I just report them!!!” The industry had been eagerly anticipating the guidelines, he said.

“I honestly can’t remember a time when advisors, tax pros and ‘mom and pop’ investors more eagerly awaited news from the IRS,” Levine said. “But more than 4.5 years after Secure was passed, we now have some definitive answers to key Q’s.”

IRA owners seeking to avoid a tax hit on their beneficiaries could convert traditional accounts to Roth ones, which usually won’t carry any more duties tied to the added income, Cleary noted.

“They would still be subject to the 10-year rule, but then they don’t necessarily have the tax issue,” he said. “It’s an idea for the right person who’s able to pay those taxes up front.”

While there are “not a ton” of strategies that advisors can take to reduce the impact of the distributions on their income once they start taking them, separate charitable donations and maximizing other deductions could mitigate part of the burden, Zack said.

Since inherited IRAs are “something that every advisor deals with,” the rules have created “this whole maze of different beneficiary withdrawal requirements” based on the year of the account owner’s death and the age, spousal and health status of the heir, she noted. And the final rule clarified that the 10-year distribution span started with IRA owners who died in 2020 — regardless of the fact that the IRS pushed back the required distribution four years in a row.

“It’s just made the landscape a lot more complicated for advisors and clients now than it used to be,” Zack said. “That is definitely of concern for some folks. That clock has been running this entire time.”

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

3 days ago

July 21, 2026

Business Finance News

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

4 days ago

July 20, 2026

Business Finance News

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

4 days ago

July 20, 2026

Business Finance News

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.