Connect with us

Accounting

IRS unveils draft Form 1099-DA for crypto reporting

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service previewed a draft version of the Form 1099-DA on Friday for crypto brokers reporting on the proceeds of digital asset transactions to their customers.

The form is the result of the bipartisan Infrastructure and Investment Jobs Act that President Biden signed into law in 2021. It classifies crypto exchanges and trading platforms as brokers and requires them to report on their customer’s gains and losses to the IRS every year starting with tax year 2025. Customers and the IRS would start receiving the forms in time for the 2026 tax season. The IRS issued proposed regulations last year on the new requirements.

Crypto brokers were supposed to start tracking the transactions last year. Under the proposed regulations a broker providing custodial services for digital asset would be required to provide adjusted basis reporting for sales of digital assets effected on or after Jan. 1, 2026, if the digital asset is acquired and continuously held by that broker in the customer’s account on or after Jan. 1, 2023.

The preview coincides with an eagerly anticipated “Bitcoin halving” event that’s expected to drive up the value of that particular cryptocurrency.

Bitcoins

“To celebrate Bitcoin Halving Day, the IRS has gifted the digital asset community with a draft IRS Form 1099-DA – the form that ‘brokers’ are supposed to begin using in 2025 to report digital asset transactions to customers,” said Tony Tuths, a principal and alternative investments and digital asset tax practice leader at KPMG, in a statement. “While we are still waiting on final regulations to see who qualifies as a broker and for an exact timeline for reporting, the draft form is telling. The ‘Broker type’ box lists brokers such as Unhosted Wallet Provider, Digital Asset Payment Processor and Kiosk Operator. This may indicate that Treasury is not backing down from its expansive scope definition of ‘broker,’ which will drag DeFi and wallet providers into reporting. Also noteworthy is Box 10b (noncovered security), still suggesting that cost basis was to be tracked from 1/1/2023 (which it’s likely not everyone has been doing).”

Crypto companies have spent heavily on lobbying lawmakers and regulators in Washington before and after the infrastructure law was passed to limit their exposure to the reporting requirements in an effort to narrowly define the meaning of the term “broker.” The inclusion of those specific categories on the form provides some clarity on who will be expected to issue the forms, and which crypto investors can expect to receive them.

Other boxes shown on the draft form provide some hints about how the final regulations will apply.

“The inclusion of a “wash sale loss disallowed” Box 1i does not mean that crypto is subject to wash sale rules,” said Jessalyn Dean, vice president of tax information reporting at Ledgible, a crypto tax and accounting software company, in an article on the Ledgible website. “It is included for purposes of digital assets that are also stock or securities already subject to wash sale rules (e.g. certain tokenized equities).”

Wash sale rules can be a concern for crypto investors. If investors repurchase their crypto assets soon after selling them, that could mean the wash sale rule, which is intended to prevent investors from claiming tax losses on assets they continue to own, comes into play.

A checkbox on the draft form in Box 11d says, “Check if sale is not recorded on the distributed ledger.”

“This is necessary because very often digital asset addresses or transaction IDs cannot be provided because transactions occurred within internal record keeping systems,” Dean explained.

Another checkbox on the form may leave some brokers confused about what to do. “Box 5 is for a broker to indicate that a loss is non-deductible due to a ‘reportable change in control or capital structure’ and references Form 8949 and Schedule D Instructions,” Dean wrote. “However, neither of those instructions give any guidance on what kind of events in crypto and digital assets could apply in these circumstances. They defer to the broker to simply figure it out in the dark with the further statement that ‘The broker should advise you of any losses on a separate statement.'”

This may be an area where the Treasury and the IRS will need to provide further guidance in the final regulations or a FAQ page.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending