Connect with us

Accounting

IRS would still operate during a shutdown

Published

on

The threat of a government shutdown appears to be receding Friday, but the IRS would nevertheless still operate during tax season, even at lower capacity, in the event of a shutdown.

“During a shutdown, the IRS operates with a limited workforce,” said Misty Erickson, a tax content program manager at the National Association of Tax Professionals. “While e-filed returns may continue to be processed, paper returns and those requiring manual intervention could face delays.​If there is a shutdown, filing electronically can help ensure there is no delay in return processing.”

IRS acting commissioner Melanie Krause sent an email to employees on Thursday telling them they would be exempt from furloughs “due to existing appropriations,” which apparently come from the Inflation Reduction Act, according to a newly updated contingency plan from the Treasury Department. The IRS would be able to operate fully staffed for at least five days. However, the continuing resolution that was largely passed by House Republicans and that the Senate needs to pass by Friday night with the help of some Senate Democrats would cut another $20.2 billion in funding from the IRS funding under the Inflation Reduction Act, after two successive cuts of over $20 billion in the past two years. 

Amid the uncertainty, the Treasury released a reassuring statement. “The Treasury put out a statement that if there were a shutdown, they were going to fund the IRS through April 30, with all of it 100% open, which means it would not cause a problem for the filing season. But then after April 30, the IRS would go to zero,” said Tax Guard CEO Hansen Rada. 

Erickson believes that tax refunds would continue to be processed, even if there were a shutdown. “In prior shutdowns, for example, the 2019 shutdown, the IRS announced it would process tax returns and provide refunds as scheduled, even amidst the funding lapse,” she said. “Congress directed the payment of all tax refunds through a permanent, indefinite appropriation (31 U.S.C. 1324), and the IRS has consistently believed that it has the authority to pay refunds despite a lapse in annual appropriations. Assuming Congress follows suit, there should be minimal impact as long as a return does not stop for review.”

However, with all the staffing cutbacks in recent weeks at the IRS, taxpayers and tax professionals are feeling worried. The IRS is said to be planning to lay off up to half its workforce and has already cut between 6,000 and 7,000 employees. However, on Thursday,a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reinstate employees at the Treasury Department and five other departments.

“There’s certainly a lot of uncertainty and a lot of anxiety about whether the Service is going to have the manpower to provide the kind of customer service that they have in recent years,” said Anne Gibson, a senior legal analyst at Wolters Kluwer. “There’s an order saying to reverse some of those firings. On the other hand, a lot of people have already been gone for quite a while from the office, and the ruling did say this doesn’t mean there can’t be reductions in force if they’re done properly. So the firings that have already happened that violated the terms that they were supposed to have, those need to be reversed. But we’ve seen that there’s already plans being talked about for further layoffs at the IRS. I’ve seen people saying they’ve heard 50% being let go at some point in the future.”

Tax professionals are trying to reassure the public about filing their tax returns, despite the turmoil this tax season. “So far, it’s going smoothly,” said Alison Flores, a manager with the Tax Institute of H&R Block. “What we do want to encourage everyone to do is file on time. So if you need to file a return, you want to try to file by April 15. Most people are owed refunds from the IRS. Go ahead and get that return in. If you’re a person who owes taxes, you also want to file. The penalty for failure to file is actually larger than the penalty for failure to pay.”

In case there are service disruptions, the NATP has some advice for taxpayers. “If they plan to file a return on paper, consider using a software service or tax professional to file it,” said Erickson. “E-filed returns should be processed as usual. Take time to compare last year’s return and informational documents to what you have this year. This allows you to double-check that you have everything before you file. We know there are delays with some forms this year, so filing early without that information will cause a problem.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending