Connect with us

Accounting

Islamic finance body delays rule shift after investor warnings

Published

on

The global authority for Islamic finance is holding off on a planned change to rules for sukuk securities after an outcry from investors that the move would upend the $1 trillion market.

To address those concerns, the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions will hold at least one more round of talks with key stakeholders — including central banks, major issuers, rating companies and lawyers — before making a decision on its Standard 62 proposal, its Secretary General Omar Mustafa Ansari said in an interview with Bloomberg News.

“We have put it on hold,” Ansari said via Zoom, after earlier planning to make the change this year. “We are willing to delay the process to make the market more ready for it.”

At the heart of the debate is a clash between how the market views sukuk — a type of security that complies with Islamic law’s prohibitions against interest — and how Islamic scholars believe it should function. Sukuk are currently treated as part of the bond ecosystem, with similar cash flows. Investors and rating companies assess the securities using the same measures of risk and financial stability.

Yet with Islamic law forbidding interest being charged on debt, sukuk represent partial ownership in an asset, with payments to investors acting as a share of the revenues or profits. The Bahrain-based financial authority wants issuers to transfer ownership of the underlying assets to investors, so that the structure is truly compliant with Islamic principles.

Industry players warn that would turn sukuk into equity-like instruments, alienating bond investors and making it harder for rating companies to assess them. That could even mean sukuk might no longer qualify for fixed-income portfolios, which would be a huge setback for a market that’s witnessed heady growth in the past five years.

“A strict implementation would materially change the nature of sukuk from being bond-like to becoming more akin to asset-backed securities,” said Amol Shitole, head of fixed income at Mashreq Capital in Dubai. “This shift could have significant consequences,” he said, pointing to risks such as variable income, greater complexity and reduced liquidity, which could all hurt demand for sukuk.

The delay to AAOIFI’s proposal to change the rules, known as Standard 62, doesn’t mean dilution of the concept, Ansari noted. The core Islamic principle barring interest-bearing transactions will be upheld at any cost, he added.

“Anybody who wants a pure bond should go to the conventional market,” he said. “Sukuk can never be a conventional bond. We want to resolve issues, but at the same time Sharia is paramount for us.”

Issuers rarely transfer ownership of underlying assets when raising funds through sukuk — a practice AAOIFI scholars say makes the instruments behave like bonds, since payments resemble interest rather than profit. 

Fragmentation risk

Investors have already voiced their concerns at the body’s previous public consultations. Mehdi Popotte, executive director and senior sukuk portfolio manager at Arqaam Capital Ltd. in Dubai, sees three key problems. Firstly, issuers — particularly sovereign states — may not want to transfer assets. Meanwhile investors may seek non-AAOIFI compliant sukuk, creating a fragmented market. Finally, AAOIFI itself does not keep official records of which sukuk it approves of.

“I believe AAOIFI is aware of those very critical challenges and as a result is taking extra time to review those and find the best compromise,” Popotte said.

AAOIFI is encouraging investors to also look at the risk of default — in a truly asset-backed structure under Standard 62, it argues investors would be able to take over or liquidate the assets quickly as owners rather than mere financiers.

“What happens in the event of default — that is the question,” Ansari said.

As negotiations continue, both sides are working toward a solution that will buttress the Islamic character of sukuk. Efforts are focused on structuring it in a way that routine cash flows would reflect a debt-type instrument, while a default would immediately invoke equity-like characteristics.

Other concerns are whether existing sukuk would have to change to comply with the new norm, and how much time national regulators will get to implement the standard. Ansari said investors and issuers needn’t worry about either.

“One part is clear: the standard is not being finalized in a haste or hurry,” he said. “Even when it’s finalized, it will provide a reasonable transition period, as well as ‘grandfathering’: those already issued will not be impacted.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending