Connect with us

Accounting

ISSB sees progress on climate standards adoption

Published

on

The International Sustainability Standards Board reported progress on adoption of its climate-related disclosures by companies around the world.

The ISSB issued a progress report Tuesday indicating that more than 1,000 companies have referenced the board in their reports and 30 jurisdictions are making progress on introducing ISSB standards in their legal or regulatory frameworks. The International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation, which oversees the ISSB and the International Accounting Standards Board, presented the findings to the Financial Stability Board on Tuesday. The report also discusses the alignment of disclosures with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures recommendations, which the IFRS Foundation took over responsibility for recording climate-related disclosure progress when the TCFD disbanded in 2023.

The release of the report comes amid the United Nations’ COP29 climate change summit in Azerbaijan this week.

The report indicated that 82% of companies disclosed information in line with at least one of the 11 TCFD recommendations as companies around the world turn their attention to climate-related disclosures. However, less than 3% of these companies are reporting in line with all 11 TCFD recommended disclosures, so few companies offer disclosures covering the company’s entire climate-related governance, strategy, risk management or metrics and targets. The report includes information about the status of the 30 jurisdictions that are progressing toward introducing ISSB standards in their regulatory frameworks, along with insights into how companies are transitioning from disclosures prepared using the TCFD recommendations to disclosures prepared using ISSB standards.

A separate analysis by the IFRS Foundation on some of the main features in these 30 jurisdictional frameworks found that jurisdictions see the value of Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions disclosures. All 29 jurisdictions that have finalized or published proposals on climate-related disclosures have included Scope 3 GHG emissions disclosure requirements, with some allowing or proposing brief extensions of transitional reliefs to prepare for the requirements.

Jurisdictions also see the value of including industry-specific disclosure requirements, according to the analysis. Some 28 jurisdictions have included or are considering requirements for industry-specific disclosure. Only two of the 30 jurisdictions have signaled their intention to make industry-specific disclosure voluntary, at least initially.

“This progress report underscores the significant and encouraging progress in disclosure of climate-related information,” said ISSB chair Emmanuel Faber in a statement. “But further action is needed to address the fact investors are still not receiving the information they need to assess and price appropriately climate and other sustainability-related risks and opportunities. Through jurisdictional initiatives and the voluntary choices companies are making, often in response to investor demand, we continue to see momentum build. The introduction of sustainability-related disclosure requirements into regulatory frameworks through the adoption or other use of ISSB standards, building on the strong foundations laid through the TCFD recommendations and progressing towards a more comprehensive and assurable set of requirements, is of vital importance for the healthy functioning of capital markets around the world.”

faber-emmanuel-issb.jpg

International Sustainability Standards Board chair Emmanuel Faber at the Bloomberg Sustainable Business Summit in London.

The ISSB found that 90% of the jurisdictions have included or are considering requirements for disclosure covering all sustainability-related risks and opportunities over time. Some jurisdictions are initially focused on the disclosure of climate-related risks and opportunities.

In some cases, jurisdictions have moved closer to the ISSB standards compared to their initial proposals in response to calls from stakeholders for greater alignment with ISSB standards and to secure comparability of disclosures by adhering to the global baseline.

One important aspect of the introduction of ISSB standards into regulatory frameworks is that a number of jurisdictions intend to introduce industry-specific disclosure requirements for the first time. Many of those stem from the standards were originally produced by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, which was absorbed into the ISSB. The SASB standards provide an important component of the ISSB’s global baseline of disclosures supporting high-quality implementation of IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information.

The Financial Stability Board also published its 2024 progress report on Achieving Consistent and Comparable Climate-related Disclosures on Tuesday, summarizing the main findings from the IFRS Foundation’s report. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending