Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO and Co-Founder of Swedish fintech Klarna, gives a thumbs up during the company’s IPO at the New York Stock Exchange in New York City, U.S., Sept. 10, 2025.
Here’s how the company performed compared to LSEG estimates
Revenues: $903 million vs. $882 million expected
Revenues grew 26% from $706 million in the year-ago period. The company reported a net loss of $95 million, a drop from a year ago when it had net income of $12 million.
The buy now, pay later firm said it’s getting a boost from outsized U.S. growth, where gross merchandise volume grew 43% from a year ago. Gross merchandise volume, which measures merchandise sold, rose 25% to $32.7 billion from $26.2 billion last year.
The adoption of features such as the Klarna Card and fair financing, which offer longer installment options for bigger purchases, contributed to U.S. gains. The feature offers varying interest rates and saw gross merchandise volume more than triple from a year ago.
Since its July launch, the fintech firm said its Klarna Card has reached more than four million customers and accounted for 15% of transactions by October.
CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski said fair financing has doubled the number of users from a year ago, but only penetrated about a fifth of merchants. That creates “tons of opportunity” for Klarna, he told CNBC.
“We want to be the one that helps you save time, save money, be in control of your finances and that’s obviously not necessarily what we’ve been associated with,” he said, adding that Klarna will continue working to gain that reputation.
Merchants grew 38% to 850,000 from 616,000 in the year-ago period, but average revenue per active customer declined.
For the fourth quarter, Klarna expects gross merchandise volume to range between $37.5 and $38.5 billion and revenues between $1.065 million and $1.08 million.
Transaction margin dollars, which measures profitability of its core business, are forecast to range between $390 million and $400 million. The figure totaled $281 million in the third quarter
In recent weeks, stocks have taken a tumble as concerns mount over a potential AI bubble with stretched valuations. Worries of a slowdown in consumer spending have also grown.
Klarna shares have shed more than one-third in value from their highs.
Siemiatkowski said the company isn’t yet seeing “material differences” in payback or spending habits due to the microenvironment, but is monitoring the AI wave that is slated to impact more white collar careers.
Over the years, Klarna has bet big on artificial intelligence. Siemiatkowski told CNBC in May that the technology, along with attrition, has helped the fintech firm slash its workforce by 40%.
He said its natural attrition rate is as much as 20%.
Klarna isn’t alone. Palantir, Salesforce and Amazon have all warned that they plan to cut their workforces or slow hiring due to AI adoption.
Siemiatkowski said AI ties into the company’s “customer-obsessed” mentality and has dropped the average amount of time to solve a customer service issue to under two minutes.
Companies that only use AI or robots to deal with customers are making a “big mistake, because you want to have a human connection,” Siemiatkowski said. “There’s this tremendous value.”
The landscape of institutional debt markets is undergoing a profound structural shift on July 21, 2026, as major corporate issuers and commercial banks rapidly accelerate the deployment of tokenized debt instruments. Data published by leading capital market consortiums indicates that primary issuances of digital commercial paper and tokenized corporate bonds have reached record volumes this month. By moving legacy debt origination, underwriting, and secondary distribution onto permissioned distributed ledgers, corporate treasurers are unlocking unprecedented operational flexibility and instantaneous cross-border liquidity.
The adoption of tokenized debt is fundamentally altering how enterprise balance sheets manage short-term liquidity needs. Traditional corporate bond settlement cycles historically required multi-day clearing processes involving numerous intermediaries, custodial entities, and clearinghouses. Through programmable smart contracts on distributed ledgers, issuers can now execute atomic settlement—enabling continuous, 24/7 access to institutional capital pools. This instantaneous clearing mechanism drastically reduces counterparty risk, eliminates costly settlement friction, and allows treasury teams to dynamically optimize working capital in real time.
A major catalyst driving this institutional migration is the establishment of comprehensive digital asset regulatory frameworks across major financial hubs. Clear legal guidelines regarding ledger-based securities ownership have provided institutional compliance officers with the regulatory confidence necessary to transition multi-billion-dollar liquidity facilities onto digital platforms. Furthermore, the integration of automated regulatory reporting directly into token smart contracts simplifies ongoing compliance audits, ensuring that secondary market trades automatically enforce investor accreditation limits and tax withholding requirements.
For chief financial officers and institutional portfolio managers, tokenized debt represents a fundamental evolution in fixed-income strategy. Companies that embrace ledger-based debt structures gain direct access to a broader, global base of digital-native institutional investors while substantially reducing borrowing overhead. As ledger interoperability continues to improve across global exchanges, tokenized debt is poised to become the standard infrastructure for global corporate finance.
Private credit has firmly established itself as a foundational pillar of global financial markets in 2026, transitioning from an alternative asset class into a dominant mechanism for middle-market corporate financing. Reports published in mid-July 2026 show that direct lending assets under management have expanded significantly, as corporate borrowers increasingly bypass traditional syndication desks in favor of customized private debt solutions. This structural migration has fundamentally altered corporate liquidity dynamics, providing middle-market enterprises with reliable access to tailored capital packages even during periods of regulatory bank tightening.
The primary driver of this continued growth is the structural flexibility inherent in private debt agreements. Unlike public bond markets or conservative commercial bank loans—which often carry rigid covenants and slow underwriting timelines—private credit funds offer speed of execution, flexible payment-in-kind structures, and customized debt-service frameworks. For companies undertaking strategic acquisitions, capital expenditures, or complex balance sheet recapitalizations, the ability to negotiate directly with a unified syndicate of private lenders provides significant certainty and confidentiality.
However, the expansion of private credit is attracting heightened regulatory attention and risk scrutiny. Financial regulatory bodies are closely evaluating the lack of secondary market price discovery and the potential concentration of illiquidity risks within non-bank financial institutions. Because private debt instruments are held to maturity and marked to model rather than marked to market, evaluating real-time enterprise valuations during economic shifts requires robust internal credit assessment standards. Analysts note that as loan portfolios mature, performance variations between disciplined lenders and aggressive underwriters will become increasingly apparent.
For corporate financial officers and institutional portfolio managers, private credit represents both a powerful strategic tool and a vital diversification strategy. Borrowers must weigh the higher nominal coupon rates of private debt against the tangible value of operational flexibility and execution certainty. Meanwhile, investors must maintain rigorous credit due diligence, prioritizing funds with proven restructuring capabilities and deep operational expertise in underwriting resilient middle-market businesses.
The integration of blockchain technology with legacy financial markets has reached a decisive tipping point in July 2026, driven by the rapid scaling of Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization. Major global investment banks, custodial entities, and asset managers are actively shifting sovereign debt, commercial paper, and private fund shares onto permissioned distributed ledgers. Recent industry data confirms that the aggregate market capitalization of tokenized treasury products and private credit funds has surged past major milestones, illustrating that ledger-based settlement is no longer experimental, but core financial infrastructure.
The fundamental value proposition of asset tokenization rests on operational efficiency, continuous liquidity, and automated compliance execution. By embedding regulatory checks, investor accreditation limits, and automated coupon distributions directly into smart contract code, financial institutions eliminate vast amounts of manual back-office reconciliation. Furthermore, fractionalized ownership structures allow high-value asset classes—such as prime commercial real estate and private equity funds—to be split into accessible units, significantly expanding liquidity pools and enabling real-time collateral optimization.
A key catalyst behind this institutional momentum is the establishment of comprehensive regulatory clarity across major financial jurisdictions. The implementation of standardized digital asset frameworks in the United States and Europe has provided institutional compliance officers with the legal certainty required to deploy capital on-chain. As a result, premier custodian banks are now offering unified digital asset custody, seamlessly bridging traditional securities depositories with programmable ledger ecosystems.
Looking forward, the maturation of tokenized assets will continue to transform secondary market trading and treasury management. Corporate treasurers can now yield-optimize idle cash in real time by moving into tokenized money market instruments that settle instantaneously on a 24/7 basis. To remain competitive, financial leaders must ensure their institutional architectures are interoperable with modern digital ledger protocols, positioning their organizations at the forefront of modern capital market efficiency.