Connect with us

Accounting

Liability risks loom for accountants in 2026 tax season

Published

on

Hanging bridge in fog

Svetlana Lukienko/Svetlana Lukienko – stock.adobe.com

That feeling of satisfaction and accomplishment that accountants feel at the end of a successful tax season can be shattered by a phone call from a dissatisfied client or a summons and complaint asserting a liability claim, and the risk factors for that kind of unfortunate event vary from year to year.

The issues facing tax practitioners are a little different this year, according to Stephen Vono, senior vice president at McGowanPro. “Some of the exposures are new, and some are perennial exposures that are ongoing,” he said. 

For instance, there is a continued focus by the Internal Revenue Service on Employee Retention Credit submissions. Accountants had to reflect the ERC in the amended return, and the IRS delayed the ERC payment, so the returns are amended, but the clients are not getting their money back — and claims rise. 

Vono recommended amending returns quickly and keeping track of expiration dates for statutes of limitations. The accountant needs to communicate with the client regularly, and ask them if they received their payment, or any other communication from the IRS.

A new area of concern involves tax planning resulting from to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Practitioners need to be aware that planning is essential for their clients, according to Vono: “At least advise that they need to plan. Again, communication is essential. The bill is far-reaching, so it touches everyone. The top exposure to tax preparers will likely occur by not staying current with all of the changes derived from the OBBBA.”

Specifically, preparers may face the following new exposures in the filing season ahead, according to Vono:

  • Not obtaining the maximum deductions available for their clients. Preparers should be alert for deductions involving tips and overtime, and to maximize deductions for seniors.
  • Not advising clients to make the necessary financial decisions that may impact their taxable burden. Preparers should take advantage of car loan interest deduction; ensure that their client is aware of the caps for tip and overtime earning; and watch for expired clean energy credits.
  • Not properly following the new tax provisions that will lead to filing errors.

Multiple state filings are fraught with tax claims, according to Vono. Continued residency audits by the state and local tax authorities are a risk that preparers should be aware of. These will uncover nexus issues, such as clients who claim they live in Florida, but they have property and their family doctor is in New York. 
Among the perennial issues that Vono thinks tax pros may face again this year:

  • Failure to detect fraud is an on-going exposure. Preparers need to verify information from the source when possible and have their “skeptics hat” on at all times.
  • Accountants taking on engagements over their head, or outside of their skill set. “Have designations where applicable,” Vono suggested. “For example, valuation services should have a CVA on the accounting team.”
  • Hackers seeking to access client files to obtain refunds or or to engage in any number of other shenanigans. Tax preparers should have full information security protocols in place and train staff far more than annually. 
  • Family disputes impacting the firm’s ability to perform its services, or difficult, uncooperative, or low-integrity clients. Vono recommended considering early disengagement if information is not provided in a timely manner.
  • Rogue firm partners or employees evading quality control policies/procedures.
  • Concerning tax services, overlooked elections and missed filing deadlines continue to cause claims. “Always have a second set of eyes on an engagement and make the calendar your friend,” he said. 
  • Relying on tax software only. “Complex returns need to be checked and reviewed,” Vono warned. “The argument that it was a tax software error is not a good defense.”

The penalty for not paying enough estimated tax than was owed in the previous year can be a rare trap for the unwary. Bill Nemeth, a Georgia practitioner, occasionally tells a client subject to the penalty that he has good news and bad news: The good news is that they’re getting a refund from the IRS, and the bad  news is they will be penalized because their refund is not big enough. 

Although this might happen “once in a blue moon,” according to Nemeth, it is due to a quirk in the Tax Code that practitioners should be aware of.

Deb Rood, risk control consulting director at CNA, underwriter for the AICPA professional liability program, pointed out some risks with the e-file signature authorization on Forms 8878 and 8879.

“The IRS requires the CPA firm to have a signed Form 8878 for the CPA to file an extension and a Form 8879 to file a tax return,” she explained. “According to our claims group, all too frequently, the CPA does not receive this before electronically filing the tax return. That’s bad.”

“What happens if the client changes their mind about filing?” she asked. “For example, we had a claim with a voluntary disclosure where the client’s attorney assured the CPA that the client could provide the e-file permission slip when they returned from a foreign trip, so the CPA filed the returns. The claim arose because the client changed their mind and stopped the voluntary disclosure process. However, the return had already been filed. Not good.”

On the flip side, she noted that her team is often asked if the CPA can wait to file a tax return for which they have an e-file permission slip until the client pays its outstanding invoices — but the IRS requires that the CPA must electronically transmit the return within three days of receipt of the e-file permission slip. 

“But it is too late to demand payment now if you already have the permission slip,” she said. “We recommend that the CPA receive payment and a signed engagement letter before sending the e–file permission slip and finalizing the tax return.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending