Connect with us

Accounting

Life insurance strategies that reduce estate taxes

Published

on

With current estate-tax rules set to expire at the end of next year, life insurance could help heirs to some high net worth clients avoid bigger costs and payments to Uncle Sam in the future.

Purchasing a “whole-life” or “permanent” policy rather than one that runs for a defined term carries much higher premiums — but those and other fees paid by high net worth clients for the insurance product now will go toward tax advantages for their estates’ inheriting beneficiaries down the line. 

As financial advisors, tax professionals and their clients try to make sense of a plethora of questions about the future guidelines looming after many provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire in 2026, life insurance strategies may play a critical role for wealthy estates.

Many registered investment advisory firms are “allergic to life insurance” as a concept, and it’s certainly not “the wrench that fits every nut,” Jack Elder, the senior vice president of advanced sales with Shakopee, Minnesota-based CBS Brokerage, said in an interview. Regardless, clients will likely hear about the potential tax-planning opportunities of buying life insurance from friends, acquaintances or the inevitable sales agent. And locking in the tax rewards now can bring some relief as life-insurance planning frequently comes up in policy proposals aimed at raising the duties paid by wealthy households by closing the loopholes in the code.

“Your clients are going to be approached, so the conversation should start with you,” Elder said. “Somebody’s going to talk to them about life insurance, so it should come from you.”

READ MORE: With Congress slow to act, financial advisors plan ahead on estate taxes

The case for a wealthy client to buy a whole-life policy and hold the contract in a vehicle such as an irrevocable life insurance trust revolves around the fact that, under the current rules, the asset no longer applies to the value of the estate. If they can afford the premiums, then the clients’ heirs will collect the death benefit tax-free in most cases to provide them with liquidity for expenses and give the accompanying cash value of the policy more time to accumulate. 

In a very critical article last year describing whole life policies as often being “sold inappropriately” and “poorly designed for their use,” and pointing out that “you get the cash value or the death benefit, but not both,” the personal finance website for doctors The White Coat Investor nonetheless cited liquidity and tax strategy as a “pro” in the products’ favor.

“An irrevocable trust is a great way to avoid estate taxes,” the website’s founder, Dr. James Dahle wrote. “By placing an asset into an irrevocable trust, any appreciation after that point occurs outside of the estate. However, trust tax rates are notoriously high, and trust tax returns can be complicated and expensive. What if you could put an asset into the trust that grows in a tax-deferred way until death and then provides an income tax-free lump sum? Voila, a whole life policy can do that.”

A strategic gift to heirs using life insurance could reduce the estate’s value for tax purposes and boost the amount that beneficiaries will receive upon a wealthy client’s death by millions of dollars, according to two illustrations that Elder shares with clients. In one example, a couple living in Washington state who are both 66 years old with an estimated longevity of 20 more years and a current net worth of $12 million will have projected wealth of $34.9 million two decades in the future. If they plan for an estate tax of $10.3 million at that time, they could spend $2.8 million on life insurance held in a trust today rather than spending the much higher amount in the future.

READ MORE: Supreme Court case tests how life insurance affects estate-tax valuations

In Elder’s other illustrative example, a couple who are 63 and 64 years old have an estimated net worth of $15.2 million. If they buy a life insurance policy that costs $2 million rather than transferring that directly to an heir, they not only avoid the gift tax, but they could instead pass down $8 million from the proceeds of the death benefits and slash the percentage of their estate that’s taxed at that time by hundreds of basis points while hiking up the heirs’ inheritances by $4.6 million.

“Strategic gifts before 2026 can save your family millions of dollars in estate taxes,” the case study said. “Those who don’t proactively use the exemption risk losing the opportunity to shelter their wealth from estate taxes. Life insurance coupled with strategic gifting can reduce estate taxes and substantially increase your net to heirs.”

Elder’s examples display some of the complexities involved with every individual client. Other complications include the fact that 17 states and the District of Columbia charge their own estate or inheritance taxes. The technical details around the ownership of the policy and a status called the “incidents of ownership,” as well as the date of the death, could also affect whether the proceeds of the death benefits wind up adding to the value of the estate, according to a guide to life insurance written by Trusts and Estates Attorney Jennifer Boyer of the Ward and Smith law firm. (The impact of life-insurance death benefits on estate valuations came up in a recent Supreme Court case.)

“While that taxable estate threshold remains high today ($12,920,000 per person for tax year 2023), it looks fairly certain to dip lower in the coming years,” Boyer wrote. “Without legislative action, in 2026, anyone with more than roughly $6,000,000 (or $12,000,000 for a married couple with appropriate estate tax planning built into their wills) will find themselves on the undesirable side of that taxable threshold. Insurance policy payouts that seemed perfectly reasonable under our currently-high estate tax thresholds may now push taxpayers over the lower limits set to take effect in 2026. If alternative ownership can be arranged, for instance, by using irrevocable trusts, limited partnerships, limited liability companies or direct ownership by children, taxpayers can realize dramatic estate tax savings.”

READ MORE: 26 tips on expiring Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions to review before 2026

In other words, any advisors and clients considering the strategy must look closely at the details of their particular estate and any potential policy before making such a costly purchase. Elder and CBS Brokerage advisors use his examples as “a conversation starter” with their clients rather than a method to use in every situation, he noted.

“The responsibility of an RIA is to expose the clients to all of the solutions and tools that can be used to efficiently transfer wealth and then let the clients decide,” Elder said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending