Connect with us

Accounting

Macquarie staff swept up in tax dividend scandal face German criminal charges

Published

on

German prosecutors are preparing to bring the first criminal charges against staff who worked at Macquarie Group Ltd. over the Cum-Ex tax scandal, in a signal that officials are ramping up their years-long probe.

Prosecutors based in Cologne plan to initially charge a few of the bankers who were working at the lender before 2012 when the trading occurred, according to people familiar with the matter. Macquarie has previously said that as many as 100 people were swept up in the probe.

A spokesman for Cologne prosecutors confirmed that they’re planning to issue new indictments but declined to disclose the names or banks involved. Macquarie declined to comment.

Cum-Ex was a controversial trading strategy designed to obtain duplicate refunds by taking advantage of how dividend taxes were collected. Germany stopped the practice in 2012 and is now probing about 1,800 suspects from across the global financial industry. More than 20 people have been convicted in German courts for their part in Cum-Ex. 

Investment bankers at Macquarie’s London office were central to Cum-Ex deals and have been in prosecutors’ cross-hairs for years. In the fallout from the scandal the lender has already settled two separate matters involving German dividend trades between 2006 and 2009. The bank paid €100 million ($105 million) to German authorities as part of this agreement.

The number of suspects in the German Cum-Ex probes linked to Macquarie has continually increased. In 2018, Macquarie said about 30 staffers were targeted. In 2020, the bank disclosed that the number had climbed to 100, most of whom are no longer at Macquarie. In a 2024 company report, the bank reiterated that number, adding that the lender has provided for financial risks out of the case.

Under German law, companies can’t be charged with crimes but prosecutors can use a related form of proceeding to add them as parties to criminal cases. That is how investigators targeted VW, when the automaker settled with prosecutors over the diesel scandal for €1 billion in 2018. 

British hedge fund trader Sanjay Shah was sentenced to 12 years in prison by Danish judges in December for orchestrating the same scam in Denmark, the heaviest jail term handed down so far in Europe.

Charges against Macquarie bankers have been expected for years but Cologne prosecutors repeatedly delayed decisions. The pandemic slowed law enforcement on multiple fronts, including reduced court capacity. 

However, the Cologne prosecutors office, which is investigating suspects in 130 different probes, has also struggled with its own work management. This week Tim Engel, the new head of Cum-Ex prosecution, told reporters this broad approach is taking a toll on investigators who have to wade through enormous amounts of seized documents.

After more than a decade of investigations, Cologne prosecutors are now also facing the prospect of running out of time to prosecute, at least in some of their cases. But only very few proceedings against individual suspects will have to be dropped completely, Engel said.  

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending