Connect with us

Accounting

Macy’s shares fall after profit hit by accounting error

Published

on

Macy’s Inc. trimmed its profit outlook after concluding its investigation into an employee plot to hide millions of dollars in expenses.

The misstatement of delivery expenses, which Macy’s has said was linked to a former employee who intentionally hid costs, will have a full-year impact of $79 million on gross margin and adjusted earnings per share, according to a statement on Wednesday. Most of the impact will be recorded in the fourth quarter. 

As a result, Macy’s reduced its earnings outlook to $2.25 to $2.50 per share from a previous range from August that topped out at $2.90. It also lowered its projected gross margin rate. 

Macy’s shares fell 8.2% in premarket trading in New York. Through Tuesday, the stock had fallen 17% this year.

Macy’s said the investigation concluded that there was “no material impact or restatements” to its previously filed financial statements. The company reiterated that the probe didn’t uncover evidence of missing cash or unpaid vendors and instead points to accounting errors by a former employee who hid approximately $151 million in delivery expenses from the fourth quarter of 2021 through the third quarter of this year. The company said it will publish revised financial information for those fiscal years on Wednesday.ported.

“We’ve concluded our investigation and are strengthening our existing controls and implementing additional changes designed to prevent this from happening again,” Chief Executive Officer Tony Spring said in a statement. 

During the past several years, Macy’s has focused on reducing its delivery expenses and other costs to increase profitability. The company’s chief financial officer mentioned delivery expenses in all but one of the 16 quarterly earnings calls that he’s participated in since joining the retailer in 2020.

Investigators were told by the employee that, initially, a mistake was made in accounting for delivery expenses, according to a person familiar with the investigation who asked not to be named disclosing information that hasn’t been made public. After that initial mistake, the employee intentionally made erroneous accounting entries to hide the mistake, the person added. The employee no longer works at Macy’s, the retailer has said. 

Macy’s said in a regulatory filing published on Wednesday that it found “material weakness” in its internal controls over manual journal entries of delivery expenses and other non-merchandise expenses. The company added that the former employee also falsified underlying documentation.

The department-store operator said it has begun to implement changes to improve its internal controls including by “re-evaluating the risk of employee circumvention of controls.” 

Macy’s also raised its outlook for full year sales. It now sees net sales in a range of $22.3 billion to $22.5 billion, up from the prior view of $22.1 billion to $22.4 billion. Same-store sales at owned and licensed locations are expected to be flat to down 1% versus the previous year. The company previously expected that measure to decline as much as 2%. 

The department-store operator delayed the reporting of its full third-quarter earnings last month when it revealed the accounting problem and instead released preliminary numbers. 

Activist pressure

Macy’s is under pressure from Barington Capital Group and Thor Equities LLC, who are urging the company to form a separate real estate unit while cutting its capital expenditures. They’re also calling on Macy’s to consider spinning off its higher-end Bloomingdale’s and Bluemercury chains. 

Barington and Thor want seats on Macy’s board and would encourage the retailer to create an internal subsidiary for its real estate that would include all of the company’s owned and leased properties, including its stores and distribution centers. Macy’s would then pay rent to the subsidiary.

Barington owned 650,000 Macy’s shares, or a 0.2% stake, according to a Sept. 30 regulatory filing. That was an increase from the 100,000 Macy’s shares it owned as of June. 

Macy’s has said it will maintain its current strategy, which focuses on improving results at the company’s most-profitable locations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending