Connect with us

Accounting

Mamdani needs to improve services not raise taxes, watchdog says

Published

on

New York City Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, and a business-backed budget watchdog agree: The government should deliver high-quality services. Where they differ is whether to raise taxes on the rich and businesses to do it. 

“He needs to focus on the priority programs that deliver, including his new programs, and be willing to shrink the ones that don’t deliver value to New Yorkers no matter how popular they are,” Andrew Rein, president of the Citizens Budget Commission, said in an interview. “We have to be very careful about the cost of government and the cost of taxes.”

The CBC laid out recommendations Wednesday for the incoming Mamdani administration to improve government services, cut spending and prepare for billions of dollars in federal budget cuts. One month after the 34-year-old is sworn in as mayor on Jan. 1, he’ll have to propose a budget that closes a deficit that could range from $5 billion to $8 billion. 

Mamdani should create a city-wide performance management system modeled on the New York Police Department’s Compstat, allowing city officials to identify programs that work and fix or eliminate those that don’t, the CBC said. The incoming mayor should also leverage labor negotiations to boost both workers’ wages and productivity and boost the city’s reserves by $1 billion a year to protect vulnerable New Yorkers from federal cuts, it said. 

Risk of raising taxes

Raising taxes on New York City’s wealthy, who already pay the highest income tax rate in the U.S., and on corporations will only hamper the city’s ability to attract and retain wealthy residents and businesses, the CBC said. Millionaires, who comprise less than 1% of New York City filers, generate 40% of city income tax revenue, it said.

Between 2010 and 2022 New York City’s share of U.S. millionaires fell to 4.2% from 6.5%, according to the group. Had it stayed constant, the city would have received an additional $2.5 billion in revenue in 2022 alone, the CBC said.

Mamdani rode to office by promising to tackle New York City’s affordability crisis, proposing a $9 billion tax increase to fund free childcare and buses and city owned-grocery stores. Yet alongside frustration about the city’s high cost of living is a belief that government isn’t working for ordinary New Yorkers.

A survey by the CBC in April found that less than three in 10 people say government is doing a good or excellent job, and about one in 10 say their tax dollars are being spent wisely. City spending on education has increased to $42,000 per student even as enrollment has declined and student test scores have shown little improvement. 

“We are spending $120 billion a year and not getting the value of those dollars,” Rein said.

Spending overshoot

New York has spent $2.3 billion more than it took in over the last three fiscal years, a rate that isn’t sustainable, especially since a recession is inevitable even if its timing is uncertain, according to the CBC. The city’s rainy day fund has only $2 billion, leaving the city ill-prepared for the next downturn. 

Mamdani has said that his administration plans to crack down on tax evasion and government efficiency. The city could save $300 million per year by reforming the procurement process, Mamdani said in his platform. 

But the city has to do more to streamline operations, the CBC said. City managers and labor unions should work together to identify work rules that constrain operations. For example, fixed shift lengths for sanitation workers and inflexible routes hamper the city Department of Sanitation’s ability to increase productivity and cut the cost of trash collection. 

“Mayor-elect Mamdani has big, bold plans,” Rein said. “But he will have to come into office and close a $6- to $8-billion budget gap, prepare for federal cuts and recession, and improve the quality of city services, which New Yorkers right now are saying are woefully inadequate.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending