Connect with us

Accounting

Mamdani needs to improve services not raise taxes, watchdog says

Published

on

New York City Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, and a business-backed budget watchdog agree: The government should deliver high-quality services. Where they differ is whether to raise taxes on the rich and businesses to do it. 

“He needs to focus on the priority programs that deliver, including his new programs, and be willing to shrink the ones that don’t deliver value to New Yorkers no matter how popular they are,” Andrew Rein, president of the Citizens Budget Commission, said in an interview. “We have to be very careful about the cost of government and the cost of taxes.”

The CBC laid out recommendations Wednesday for the incoming Mamdani administration to improve government services, cut spending and prepare for billions of dollars in federal budget cuts. One month after the 34-year-old is sworn in as mayor on Jan. 1, he’ll have to propose a budget that closes a deficit that could range from $5 billion to $8 billion. 

Mamdani should create a city-wide performance management system modeled on the New York Police Department’s Compstat, allowing city officials to identify programs that work and fix or eliminate those that don’t, the CBC said. The incoming mayor should also leverage labor negotiations to boost both workers’ wages and productivity and boost the city’s reserves by $1 billion a year to protect vulnerable New Yorkers from federal cuts, it said. 

Risk of raising taxes

Raising taxes on New York City’s wealthy, who already pay the highest income tax rate in the U.S., and on corporations will only hamper the city’s ability to attract and retain wealthy residents and businesses, the CBC said. Millionaires, who comprise less than 1% of New York City filers, generate 40% of city income tax revenue, it said.

Between 2010 and 2022 New York City’s share of U.S. millionaires fell to 4.2% from 6.5%, according to the group. Had it stayed constant, the city would have received an additional $2.5 billion in revenue in 2022 alone, the CBC said.

Mamdani rode to office by promising to tackle New York City’s affordability crisis, proposing a $9 billion tax increase to fund free childcare and buses and city owned-grocery stores. Yet alongside frustration about the city’s high cost of living is a belief that government isn’t working for ordinary New Yorkers.

A survey by the CBC in April found that less than three in 10 people say government is doing a good or excellent job, and about one in 10 say their tax dollars are being spent wisely. City spending on education has increased to $42,000 per student even as enrollment has declined and student test scores have shown little improvement. 

“We are spending $120 billion a year and not getting the value of those dollars,” Rein said.

Spending overshoot

New York has spent $2.3 billion more than it took in over the last three fiscal years, a rate that isn’t sustainable, especially since a recession is inevitable even if its timing is uncertain, according to the CBC. The city’s rainy day fund has only $2 billion, leaving the city ill-prepared for the next downturn. 

Mamdani has said that his administration plans to crack down on tax evasion and government efficiency. The city could save $300 million per year by reforming the procurement process, Mamdani said in his platform. 

But the city has to do more to streamline operations, the CBC said. City managers and labor unions should work together to identify work rules that constrain operations. For example, fixed shift lengths for sanitation workers and inflexible routes hamper the city Department of Sanitation’s ability to increase productivity and cut the cost of trash collection. 

“Mayor-elect Mamdani has big, bold plans,” Rein said. “But he will have to come into office and close a $6- to $8-billion budget gap, prepare for federal cuts and recession, and improve the quality of city services, which New Yorkers right now are saying are woefully inadequate.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending