Connect with us

Accounting

Maybe your accounting firm shouldn’t start a podcast

Published

on

Podcasting is the new blogging. Everyone’s doing it, and you should, too, right? Not so fast.

At the 2024 Digital Deep Dive conference in Atlanta, Georgia, Brandon Hall and I shared our experiences with podcasting and lessons learned. While our podcasts have seen remarkable success — my show, “The Accounting Podcast,” has notched millions of views on YouTube, and Brandon’s podcast, “Tax Smart Real Estate Investors,” generates 40-45% of new revenue for his firm — we wanted to emphasize that podcasting is not for everyone.

Before diving into podcasting, firms must carefully consider the significant time commitment, the need for a clear content strategy, and the challenges in measuring success to determine if starting a podcast aligns with their goals and resources.

It takes a lot of effort

One of the biggest challenges is the time commitment and consistency required to create a successful show. As Brandon pointed out during our session, “The top 1% of podcasts have 21 [or more] episodes. If you can hit the 21-episode mark, you’re now in the top 1% of all podcasts. When you talk about launching a podcast, everybody gets really excited. But what you don’t realize is that the results take a really long time.”

Many podcasts fail to make it past the first few episodes because the hosts severely underestimate the time required to keep the show running. After several years, Brandon’s show takes him about an hour and a half of his weekly time. But at the start, it can take a lot longer. Budget half a day per week to start. That will decline as you gain experience.

Committing for the long term is also critical. Brandon and I suggest planning to produce your podcast consistently for at least a year, if not longer, to give it the best chance of gaining traction.

microphone-118153873-adobe-365.jpg

As for how often to record, Brandon recommends a weekly podcast schedule to keep listeners engaged and make it easier for your team to produce content. He noted, “You just get everybody into the habit of producing a weekly show … it ironically becomes easier.” 

You’ll also benefit from having your episodes at the top of the podcast player list. Subscribe to more than a handful of podcasts, and you’ll see how quickly new episodes get pushed below the first page of results.

It takes a long time to generate leads

Because a podcast takes a long time to generate leads, it must create value in other ways for your firm. And it can. Brandon noted, “If you pitch it as top of funnel or start thinking of it as top of funnel, it’s going to take a really long time for you to realize that goal.”

One way to maximize the value of your podcast is to repurpose its content into various formats, such as blog posts, videos, social media posts, and newsletters. Brandon said, “We think about our content in terms of whether we can talk about the same thing in multiple formats so that our potential buyers can consume our content in whatever way they find easiest. So we have videos, podcasts, Instagram and Twitter, TikTok, YouTube shorts, and newsletters. It’s all saying the same stuff, but you get to choose how you consume it.”

It’s difficult to attribute revenue

Measuring the success of your podcast and attributing leads and revenue directly to the show can be a challenge, too. As I argued during the session, “Don’t try to attribute business to your podcast. The podcast is just a way to create all the content that powers your content marketing engine.” 

In other words, your podcast should be a part of a larger content marketing strategy, not a standalone lead generation tool.

The difficulty in measuring podcast success and attributing leads and revenue is why many companies stop investing in podcasting. It’s hard to justify spending the money when the leads aren’t coming in the door. Having realistic expectations and understanding that your podcast’s impact may not always be immediately apparent or easily quantifiable is essential.

Is podcasting right for your accounting firm?

While podcasting can be a valuable tool for business growth and establishing thought leadership, it’s not the right choice for everyone. As more accounting firms explore podcasting as a marketing strategy, it’s crucial to approach it with realistic expectations and a well-defined plan.

Before starting a podcast, consider the following:

  • Do you have the time and resources to produce high-quality content consistently?
  • How will your podcast fit into your overall content marketing strategy?
  • What are your goals for the podcast, and how will you measure success?
  • Are you prepared to commit to podcasting for the long term, even if results aren’t immediate?

Firms that can commit to long-term investment and create valuable content for their target audience may find success in podcasting. However, it’s essential to carefully weigh the challenges and considerations before diving in.

If you still want to start a podcast after considering these challenges, email me at [email protected], and my team will work with you to ensure your podcast journey is successful.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending