Connect with us

Accounting

Medicaid work requirements sought to fund Trump tax cuts

Published

on

House Republicans want to impose work requirements on some Medicaid recipients up to 64 years old and impose more costs on some beneficiaries to help pay for President Donald Trump’s planned sweeping tax package.

The moves, unveiled by Republican leaders in draft legislation Sunday night, are described as ways to better protect coverage to people who most need it. Critics counter that millions of recipients will have trouble navigating complex reporting systems and lose coverage. 

The proposed cuts to the federal health insurance program that offers coverage for poor and disabled Americans are shaping up as one of the most contentious fights in the fiscal package. 

At least 13.7 million people would lose health insurance by 2034 as a result of the bill, which also curtails some Affordable Care Act coverage, according to analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. In total, all the committee’s changes — including those unrelated to heath care — would save the federal government at least $912 billion, the group said.

The bill offered by the Energy and Commerce Committee also includes a menu of other moves, ranging from raising millions of dollars by reauthorizing FCC spectrum auctioning to retaining some unspent climate-related spending — which the committee’s chairman, Brett Guthrie of Kentucky, calls “Green New Deal-style waste.”

The committee Republicans didn’t include the president’s request to force drugmakers to accept lower payments for prescriptions covered by Medicaid by tying them to prices the companies charge foreign governments. Trump, separately on Sunday, said he plans to unveil an executive order on drug pricing Monday morning that would mandate Americans pay no more than people in whatever country has the lowest price. 

A public hearing by the panel is set to begin Tuesday afternoon to advance its proposals. 

Medicaid represents a substantial chunk of the panel’s jurisdiction.

The work requirements target so-called “able-bodied adults without dependents.” Broadly written, it would exclude parents with dependent children, pregnant women, those with a disability and people with substance abuse disorders. 

Republicans are also proposing expanding the fees that some poor and disabled enrollees pay for health care services. The plan also includes a measure that would cut federal funding for states that use their own funds to cover health services for undocumented immigrants. 

Guthrie in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal published Sunday characterized the changes as addressing “Medicaid waste and abuse.” He highlighted that the legislation would roll back regulations on Medicaid eligibility and enrollment practices established under President Joe Biden, saving the federal government $172 billion over a decade.

“When so many Americans who are truly in need rely on Medicaid for life-saving services, Washington can’t afford to undermine the program further by subsidizing capable adults who choose not to work,” Guthrie said. 

Democrats have attacked the idea of curtailing health coverage to help defray tax cuts they portray as skewed toward wealthier taxpayers. Some moderate Republicans from swing districts have warned they won’t go along with Medicaid cuts they consider too deep.

The plan unveiled by the committee Sunday night was already being criticized by Democrats as going far beyond simply attacking waste and fraud, implementing measures that could make it difficult for even people who qualify to maintain coverage. 

“The overwhelming majority of the savings in this bill will come from taking health care away from millions of Americans,” said Frank Pallone, the top Democrat on the committee. “Nowhere in the bill are they cutting ‘waste, fraud, and abuse’ — they’re cutting people’s health care and using that money to give tax breaks to billionaires.”

The cumulative paperwork burden could be substantial. Beyond proving some enrollees work at least 80 hours per month, Republicans also want to implement more frequent checks on whether some people in the Medicaid program are actually qualified to receive benefits. Checks would occur for people insured through the Affordable Care Act’s expansion population every six months, instead of annually.

The committee also proposes limiting states’ ability to pay their share of Medicaid by placing a moratorium on new or increased taxes on medical providers. Some states tax health care providers such as hospitals to help raise money for state Medicaid budgets. States would also be limited from seeking new payments for providers that exceed Medicare payment rates. 

Critics say limiting provider tax rates would simultaneously limit states’ ability to pay their higher tab as a result of the reductions to federal matching funds.

Health care industry groups that represent insurers and hospitals have lobbied opposing the Medicaid cuts. Hospitals face higher uninsured rates if spending cuts result in more people losing insurance coverage, and insurers that manage Medicaid programs make less money if fewer people are enrolled. Insurers Centene Corp., Elevance Health Inc., UnitedHealth Group Inc., Molina Healthcare Inc., and CVS Health Corp. are major players in administering Medicaid plans. 

Senior pharmaceutical executives mounted a furious lobbying campaign to stop Trump’s drug pricing proposal, which the industry’s largest trade group told lawmakers could cost drug companies as much as $1 trillion in revenue over a decade. The industry got a surprise win in the form of a tweak to the Inflation Reduction Act which would allow drugs to be exempt from Medicare’s drug price negotiation program if they are approved to treat multiple rare diseases.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending