Connect with us

Accounting

Meta’s accounting move on AI servers to boost profit

Published

on

Meta Platforms Inc. made a small change last month that’s likely to increase the company’s profit by billions of dollars this year.

It wasn’t the release of a new product or cost cuts. It was a tweak to an accounting formula used to measure the depreciation of its expensive artificial intelligence infrastructure. 

The change, disclosed in the social-media giant’s earnings materials on Jan. 29, extends the so-called useful life period of certain servers and networking assets to five and a half years, from the four to five years it previously used. While that may sound trivial, its impact on earnings will be sizable given the heavy spending on these relatively short-lived assets.

By Meta’s reckoning, the shift is expected to reduce the company’s depreciation expense by $2.9 billion in 2025, which would, on its own, amount to almost 4% of the estimated pre-tax profits for the year. With Meta planning to spend as much as 75% more this year on capital expenditures to build out its AI capabilities, the effect will be even bigger in 2026.

The changing expectations highlight how companies are grappling with the temporary shelf life of the tens of billions of dollars of new semiconductors and computer servers they are purchasing to power their AI services. Meta is now hoping that the equipment will last longer than they had expected.  

“While there may be legitimate reasons to extend the server life based on their actual experience, it also decreases the depreciation in the short run and improves the bottom line,” said Ravi Gomatam, partner at tax and accounting firm Zion Research Group.

Meta’s chief financial officer, Susan Li, said on the most recent earnings call that the company is making efficiency gains “by extending the useful lives of our servers and associated networking equipment.” A Meta representative declined to comment.

Meta isn’t alone in changing its timetable on depreciation — and with it, the financial results. In 2022, Microsoft Corp. extended the useful lives of server and networking equipment to six years from four. In 2023, Oracle Corp. extended its estimate to five years, from four, according to a filing.

Others, however, have taken the opposite approach. Amazon.com Inc. said this month that the lifespan of the equipment is growing shorter — from six years to five. The change, which took effect on Jan. 1, will cut operating income by about $700 million, the company said in a filing. 

Unlike real estate, where amortization is spread out over decades, computing and networking gear lose their value much more quickly. The reason is simple: buildings tend to hold their value over long periods; the pace of technology advancement, on the other hand, is so fast that even the most recent models become obsolete in a matter of years, much like an old iPhone.

“It’s the number one number that they can adjust back out because it’s not a cash expense,” said Francine McKenna, an accounting expert and newsletter author. “It’s a big deal in capital intensive companies and in companies that are technologically dependent, where it’s a competitive advantage.”

With companies like Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet Inc. pledging to boost capital expenditures this year by tens of billions of dollars, those depreciation expenses threaten to be an increasingly big drag on profits in coming years.

Those four companies are expected to spend about $300 billion on capital expenditures in 2025, up from $217 billion in 2024, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. 

Bank of America estimates the spending will be a 1.6 percentage point drag on the companies’ margins for earnings before interest and taxes in 2026 compared with the fourth quarter of 2024, strategists Ohsung Kwon and Savita Subramanian wrote in a research note on Feb. 10.

None of this seems to be concerning investors, who have been focused on the potential growth from the AI operations. Meta shares have closed higher for a record 17 consecutive days.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending