Connect with us

Accounting

Morningstar rates 529 savings plans

Published

on

Very few 529 plans earned Morningstar’s top rating for investment quality, management, oversight and fees — but the tax savings are the X factor in educational investment accounts.

Just 31 out of 59 savings plans for college and other educational expenses rated “gold,” “silver” or “bronze” ratings from the research firm. But the seemingly poor showing belies general improvements among 529 providers since Morningstar began evaluating them 12 years ago, according to the study last month by research analyst Hyunmin Kim. Regardless, 529 plans in Alaska, Illinois, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Utah surpassed their peers in terms of their “exceptional state stewardship of investor capital and well-constructed portfolios managed by competent investment teams,” the analysis showed. At least 26 other plans received silver or bronze designations, while 22 earned “neutral” ratings and six got “negative” scores. All told, the plans reviewed by Morningstar’s analysts comprise more than 90% of 529 plan assets.

Predominantly “meh” grades for the 529 plans came as no shock to Dinon Hughes, a partner at Portsmouth, New Hampshire-based registered investment advisory firm Nvest Financial and a member of this year’s class of Financial Planning Rising Stars. Like Morningstar’s analysis, he pointed to state and federal tax incentives as more important aspects for financial advisors and their clients to consider than specific ratings for 529 plans, which he said are “definitely still the gold standard of education savings.” 

The plans themselves are “not that differentiated” from one another, beyond variation in tax-break structure by state and whether a wealth management firm has a selling agreement with certain providers that may limit a client’s options, Hughes noted.

“It’s worked for many plans for decades and decades and decades,” he said. “At their essence, all of them really offer the same things.”

READ MORE: Elephant IRAs: Why wealthy clients face tax risks (even with Roths)

chart visualization

Investor demand for 529 plans

And that has proved appealing to many savers, to the tune of nearly 17 million 529 plan accounts with $525 billion in assets at the end of last year — an average of $30,961 per saver, according to the National Association of State Treasurers’ College Savings Plans Network, an advocacy group for state plan administrators. 

Those numbers will likely grow alongside the rising cost of college, clients’ desire to avoid student loan debt and expansions of the 529 plan tax benefits from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Other attractive features of 529 plans include the ability to transfer some balances into Roth individual retirement accounts. However, other types of investment accounts that bring different advantages are emerging alternatives, and 529 plans have occasionally run afoul of the rules

State taxes “should be the first consideration for most people” when thinking about 529 plans, according to Morningstar’s analysis, which included links to other guides about how to understand and estimate them. For a household with a couple filing jointly at an income of $100,000, the federal savings on returns and qualified withdrawals alone start at 14%, with higher percentages available in some states.

Outside the tax impact, the 529 plans sold through advisors “tend to offer more actively managed strategies and niche exposures for a higher cost,” compared to the direct accounts with typically “smaller menus, more index funds and lower price tags,” Kim wrote in the report. The top-performing plans in Morningstar’s study offered lower fees than peers as well as allocations from thorough research, investment teams with substantial resources, long tenures and rigorous selection processes and “stable and engaged oversight from the state,” she wrote.

“If your state offers generous tax advantages and highly rated plans, you likely have an easy choice to make,” Kim wrote. “If your state does not offer (good) tax benefits and your state-sponsored plans earn a Morningstar Medalist Rating of ‘neutral’ or ‘negative,’ you are likely better served by a different state’s 529 plan. If your state offers generous tax benefits but lackluster plans, you should do a cost-benefit analysis of what it means to invest in the state versus out of state. Tax benefits are more certain than future returns.”

READ MORE: The big changes to HSAs and what they mean for planning

chart visualization

Grading 529s and other savings methods

Despite the lackluster grades across this channel of asset management, Morningstar reported that the general trends in the past dozen years or so have worked in investors’ favor.

“Since Morningstar began rating 529 education savings plans in 2012, an increasing number of plans have adopted some or more of the positive attributes described in our methodology,” Kim wrote. “Asset managers no longer consider education savings plans as an afterthought to their existing multi-asset offerings; instead, we see an increasing dedication of research and resources to specifically help education savers. Stewardship standards continue to rise as well. Robust interaction between the state and its investment entity forms a baseline now, with more engaged state entities aggressively negotiating with external managers and advocating for their accountholders.”

When clients or prospective customers ask Hughes about 529 plans, he advises them to weigh the tax benefits and the investment options against the fees and rules for the use of the holdings in the future, he noted. But more savers are considering alternative options like Uniform Transfers to Minors Act accounts that don’t get the same tax treatment but offer more flexibility to use the nest eggs for other needs besides education.

“‘Hey, I don’t know if my kid’s going to college — I don’t know if I want to do that, and I don’t know if they’re going to want to do that,'” Hughes said some investors are telling him. “We’ve been having those types of conversations with parents who want to set something aside for their kids but might not want the 529 route.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending