Connect with us

Accounting

Morningstar rates 529 savings plans

Published

on

Very few 529 plans earned Morningstar’s top rating for investment quality, management, oversight and fees — but the tax savings are the X factor in educational investment accounts.

Just 31 out of 59 savings plans for college and other educational expenses rated “gold,” “silver” or “bronze” ratings from the research firm. But the seemingly poor showing belies general improvements among 529 providers since Morningstar began evaluating them 12 years ago, according to the study last month by research analyst Hyunmin Kim. Regardless, 529 plans in Alaska, Illinois, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Utah surpassed their peers in terms of their “exceptional state stewardship of investor capital and well-constructed portfolios managed by competent investment teams,” the analysis showed. At least 26 other plans received silver or bronze designations, while 22 earned “neutral” ratings and six got “negative” scores. All told, the plans reviewed by Morningstar’s analysts comprise more than 90% of 529 plan assets.

Predominantly “meh” grades for the 529 plans came as no shock to Dinon Hughes, a partner at Portsmouth, New Hampshire-based registered investment advisory firm Nvest Financial and a member of this year’s class of Financial Planning Rising Stars. Like Morningstar’s analysis, he pointed to state and federal tax incentives as more important aspects for financial advisors and their clients to consider than specific ratings for 529 plans, which he said are “definitely still the gold standard of education savings.” 

The plans themselves are “not that differentiated” from one another, beyond variation in tax-break structure by state and whether a wealth management firm has a selling agreement with certain providers that may limit a client’s options, Hughes noted.

“It’s worked for many plans for decades and decades and decades,” he said. “At their essence, all of them really offer the same things.”

READ MORE: Elephant IRAs: Why wealthy clients face tax risks (even with Roths)

chart visualization

Investor demand for 529 plans

And that has proved appealing to many savers, to the tune of nearly 17 million 529 plan accounts with $525 billion in assets at the end of last year — an average of $30,961 per saver, according to the National Association of State Treasurers’ College Savings Plans Network, an advocacy group for state plan administrators. 

Those numbers will likely grow alongside the rising cost of college, clients’ desire to avoid student loan debt and expansions of the 529 plan tax benefits from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Other attractive features of 529 plans include the ability to transfer some balances into Roth individual retirement accounts. However, other types of investment accounts that bring different advantages are emerging alternatives, and 529 plans have occasionally run afoul of the rules

State taxes “should be the first consideration for most people” when thinking about 529 plans, according to Morningstar’s analysis, which included links to other guides about how to understand and estimate them. For a household with a couple filing jointly at an income of $100,000, the federal savings on returns and qualified withdrawals alone start at 14%, with higher percentages available in some states.

Outside the tax impact, the 529 plans sold through advisors “tend to offer more actively managed strategies and niche exposures for a higher cost,” compared to the direct accounts with typically “smaller menus, more index funds and lower price tags,” Kim wrote in the report. The top-performing plans in Morningstar’s study offered lower fees than peers as well as allocations from thorough research, investment teams with substantial resources, long tenures and rigorous selection processes and “stable and engaged oversight from the state,” she wrote.

“If your state offers generous tax advantages and highly rated plans, you likely have an easy choice to make,” Kim wrote. “If your state does not offer (good) tax benefits and your state-sponsored plans earn a Morningstar Medalist Rating of ‘neutral’ or ‘negative,’ you are likely better served by a different state’s 529 plan. If your state offers generous tax benefits but lackluster plans, you should do a cost-benefit analysis of what it means to invest in the state versus out of state. Tax benefits are more certain than future returns.”

READ MORE: The big changes to HSAs and what they mean for planning

chart visualization

Grading 529s and other savings methods

Despite the lackluster grades across this channel of asset management, Morningstar reported that the general trends in the past dozen years or so have worked in investors’ favor.

“Since Morningstar began rating 529 education savings plans in 2012, an increasing number of plans have adopted some or more of the positive attributes described in our methodology,” Kim wrote. “Asset managers no longer consider education savings plans as an afterthought to their existing multi-asset offerings; instead, we see an increasing dedication of research and resources to specifically help education savers. Stewardship standards continue to rise as well. Robust interaction between the state and its investment entity forms a baseline now, with more engaged state entities aggressively negotiating with external managers and advocating for their accountholders.”

When clients or prospective customers ask Hughes about 529 plans, he advises them to weigh the tax benefits and the investment options against the fees and rules for the use of the holdings in the future, he noted. But more savers are considering alternative options like Uniform Transfers to Minors Act accounts that don’t get the same tax treatment but offer more flexibility to use the nest eggs for other needs besides education.

“‘Hey, I don’t know if my kid’s going to college — I don’t know if I want to do that, and I don’t know if they’re going to want to do that,'” Hughes said some investors are telling him. “We’ve been having those types of conversations with parents who want to set something aside for their kids but might not want the 529 route.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending