Connect with us

Accounting

Musk’s cost-cutting campaign is annoying Treasury staff

Published

on

When Elon Musk and his team of young deputies gained access to the Treasury Department computer network that the U.S. government uses to pay its bills, and where private financial data of nearly every American is stored, it caused alarm across the country.

It also seemed to put Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in the middle of a delicate standoff between bureaucrats at the agency he is charged with leading and President Donald Trump’s loudest advisor.

With Trump’s blessing, Musk, the world’s richest man and chief executive of automaker Tesla Inc., has been leading a tornadic campaign to remake the federal bureaucracy that some critics have called illegal.

Bessent, a figure of the traditional finance world, is more on board with the Musk crew’s mission than has been widely understood.

As Bessent was building out his team in December, he interviewed Tom Krause, who is now a member of Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, according to a person familiar with the matter. Krause is now digging into Treasury’s systems and data.

Among the topics they discussed during the interview was the very mission in which DOGE is now engaged, the person said.

A group of roughly half a dozen GOP senators reached out privately to the White House to object to Musk’s accessing of Treasury systems, according to people familiar with the conversations. The senators indicated that the moves went beyond DOGE’s stated mission to save the government money.

Yet the secretary they voted to confirm was involved in planning the moves now underway, even recommending Krause for the special government employee status he now is using to plumb Treasury’s servers.

A Treasury spokesperson declined to comment.

Musk’s systematic provocation has put even some allies of the White House in uncomfortable positions. But the relationship with Bessent reflects how the symbiosis between Musk and Trump is holding — for now.

While Trump aides aren’t bothered by Musk’s efforts to reduce outlays, according to people familiar with the dynamic, the manner in which he is doing it is causing some heartburn, since he often plows ahead before the president has previewed his actions.

Overseeing Musk’s efforts has fallen to Trump Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and the White House counsel, while other top Trump aides have tried to steer clear. Wiles and other Trump officials have also had to fix problems Musk created for some of the president’s Cabinet appointees.

So far, Trump has been pleased with the furor Musk has kicked up, people close to the president say, even if he has at times had to reiterate that he — and not the world’s richest man — occupies the Oval Office.

“Sometimes we won’t agree with it, and we’ll not go where he wants to go,” Trump said of Musk this week. “But I think he’s doing a great job.”

Invaluable access

Even if Trump eventually sours on Musk and his frantic effort to rein in federal spending, Musk, who entered government in a prime position to advance his business interests, will come out ahead, say former Trump officials.

By the time Trump tires of Musk, which most Trump advisors see as inevitable, the magnate will have enough information and access to the government to no longer need his compact with the president.

Musk’s rapid-fire moves to peel back financial data and payment systems could be invaluable in the long run, the people said, as it could shed light on pricing and payment data from Boeing Co., with which Musk’s SpaceX has competed for launch business, or tax information for automakers competing with Tesla.

The Treasury Department said in a letter Tuesday to Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, that Musk’s team only received permission to read Treasury data, not alter code. No valid agency payment requests have been denied, the department said.

Musk’s broad visibility into the government’s finances and operations poses serious questions about the potential for conflicts with his business empire, which in addition to Tesla and SpaceX includes social media platform X and brain-implant maker Neuralink, as well as The Boring Company, a tunneling business.

Musk is classified as a “special government employee,” a temporary designation that in theory limits his term of service to 130 days out of the year, while shielding him from financial disclosures and other ethics requirements imposed on regular federal hires. 

“Everyone is working as a team, led by President Trump and his highly respected Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and any speculation otherwise is pure fantasy pushed by people who have nothing better to do with their lives,” said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.

Disdaining diversity

Musk’s sweeping moves to downsize the government echo the views of other top Trump officials. The casual denigration of government service in emails that the DOGE team blasted out to encourage federal workers to resign recalled speeches given by Russ Vought, the president’s nominee to run the Office of Management and Budget. Vought has reportedly said his goal is for federal workers to dread coming to work, and to feel as if they are “villains.”

Musk and Trump also share a disdain for diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI. Among the new regime’s earliest moves was to convene a meeting of all the offices at the headquarters of the Federal Aviation Administration, according to a person briefed on the plan. The only section not invited to the meeting: the FAA’s Office of Civil Rights.

Behind the scenes, Trump officials have had to rein in Musk’s unruliness when it risked creating blowback for other parts of the administration.

Last week, Wiles helped direct efforts to clean up after Musk responded to Senator Todd Young’s reported doubts about the nomination of former Representative Tulsi Gabbard to be the director of national intelligence, according to a person familiar with the matter. 

“Todd Young is a deep state puppet,” Musk declared on X. He then walked back the comment two hours later, posting that he and Young had an “excellent” conversation. Young voted to advance Gabbard’s nomination on Tuesday.

Familiar roles

Some of Musk’s DOGE staff have been brought on to do work that echoes tasks they carried out for his companies. 

Nicole Hollander, the romantic partner of a Musk lieutenant named Steve Davis, is embedded at the General Services Administration, working on terminating leases for federal office space. Hollander, who has worked in real estate for over a decade, currently serves as real estate director at X Corp., where she similarly aided Musk’s mission of reducing the social media company’s physical footprint. 

In coordination with DOGE staffers, GSA’s public buildings commissioner this week directed agency employees to terminate 300 federal leases a day until they reach 3,000, part of DOGE’s plan to “right size” the government portfolio, according to two people familiar with the mandate. 

That fast-paced effort will likely put GSA and DOGE on a collision course with lawmakers, who have historically rejected efforts to get rid of buildings in their districts.

Democrats appeared dazed by DOGE’s initial strikes. That was changing this week, as lawmakers joined federal workers rallying outside government office buildings. Increasingly, they are trying to turn Trump against Musk by painting him as a threat to the president’s primacy.

“We don’t pledge allegiance to Elon Musk,” said Senator Chris Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut. “We don’t pledge allegiance to the creepy 22-year-olds working for Elon Musk.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending