Connect with us

Accounting

Navigating ownership transitions for private company financial leaders

Published

on

As record numbers of boomers reach retirement age, more private companies than ever must wrestle with transition challenges. 

Seven out of 10 business owners aged 50-plus will transition out of their businesses within the next decade, according to data from the Exit Planning Institute. Meanwhile, the U.S. Small Business Administration estimates that 10 million boomer-owned businesses will change hands between 2019 and 2029. This “Silver Tsunami” means private companies are grappling like never before with the complexities of ensuring continuity in leadership and operations. Against this backdrop, chief financial officers will assume a pivotal role in orchestrating strategies that safeguard the future viability and prosperity of their organizations. 

Transition planning is inherently multidisciplinary. Private company CFOs must navigate complex financial structures, assess risk factors and collaborate with legal and HR teams to ensure a seamless transition process. That’s more easily said than done. CFOs must have a blend of financial acumen and interpersonal skills to navigate the intricacies of an ownership transfer smoothly. 

For private company CFOs, controllers and senior managers, their plate is full these days. But, without having a clear roadmap for ownership transfer, they could face a succession crisis, leadership gaps and potential legal disputes. Moreover, the lack of a structured transition plan can erode stakeholder trust, diminish employee morale and jeopardize customer relationships. Ultimately, failing to plan for an ownership transition can result in irreparable damage to their company’s reputation and financial standing.

Getting started on the path to transition planning

The first crucial step in business transition planning is to identify key stakeholders and to clarify long-term objectives. Stakeholders may include owners, family members, employees, investors and external advisors. Understanding and communicating their perspectives, concerns and aspirations is essential for crafting a transition plan that aligns with the company’s goals and values. 

A thorough assessment of the current business structure and ownership structure is imperative for effective transition planning. At a minimum, CFOs should evaluate legal entities, ownership percentages, governance structures and operational frameworks. Identifying potential challenges, such as complex ownership arrangements or outdated governance practices, enables a company’s senior financial leaders to devise strategies to streamline the transition process. Additionally, assessing the company’s financial health and market position provides valuable insights for shaping the transition plan.

Setting clear and measurable goals, along with realistic timelines, is essential for driving the transition planning process forward. These goals may include succession objectives, financial targets, operational milestones and strategic initiatives. Establishing achievable timelines helps ensure accountability and progress throughout the transition journey. By breaking down the transition plan into actionable steps with defined deadlines, CFOs can maintain momentum and mitigate delays or setbacks.

Four transition options

Exploring ownership transfer options is a critical aspect of business transition planning. Here are four viable options for private companies to consider:

1. Family succession: Family succession involves transferring ownership and leadership of the business to family members, typically to the next generation. This option preserves the legacy of the company while keeping it within the family’s control. However, family succession can present challenges related to family dynamics, succession readiness and inequitable distribution of company ownership among family members. 

2. Management buyout: An MBO allows the existing management team or group of managers to purchase an ownership stake in the company. This option provides continuity in leadership and allows experienced managers to take ownership and responsibility for your company’s future. MBOs can be attractive for companies that have capable management teams seeking to retain control and continuity while providing liquidity for exiting owners. 

3. Employee stock ownership plan: An ESOP involves the establishment of a trust to purchase company shares on behalf of employees. Through ESOPs, employees gradually acquire ownership stakes in the firm, aligning their interests with the company’s long-term success. ESOPs can enhance employee engagement, retention and productivity while providing a tax-efficient mechanism for ownership transition. 

4. Selling to a third party: Selling the business to a third party, such as a strategic buyer, private equity firm or other outside investor, is a common ownership transfer option for private companies. This option offers liquidity for owners and may provide opportunities for business expansion, access to new markets or strategic partnerships. However, a third-party sale can greatly alter company culture, operations and strategic direction so it requires careful consideration of your company’s values and goals.

No matter which transition option CFOs choose, they must pay close attention to the business valuation and tax implications of the transaction.

Valuation and tax implications 

Conducting a comprehensive valuation of the business is essential for determining its fair market value and for facilitating informed decision-making during an ownership transition. Valuation methods may include asset-based approaches, income-based approaches or market-based approaches. As a senior member of a company’s financial team, CFOs have a thorough understanding of the organization’s financial performance, assets and liabilities. But do they know how to incorporate those metrics and proper market data to do a fair market value analysis? This is where engaging an independent business valuation professional can help them get an objective, independent assessment of your company’s true worth. 

Valuation is a highly subjective field and requires three key attributes: 1. Sound methodology and logic;2. Data, data and more data;3. Ability to utilize multiple methodologies. Each of the attributes above involves accounting, financial, economic and legal considerations. While most senior leaders possess some of this expertise, very few can translate that knowledge into an accurate appraisal. Common mistakes include conflating enterprise value and equity value, or using an overly simple methodology that doesn’t accurately reflect the company’s worth. Another common misstep is using outdated or irrelevant market multiples (often from a previous transaction in which they were tangentially involved). Further, most private company financial leaders are unaware of how certain factors affect the value of partial equity interests (i.e. less than 100%). 

Without having a qualified appraiser to guide your team, the company and its owners could be exposed to the following risks:

1. Receiving more (or less) than fair market value;
2. Understating or overstating taxable income for the entity or its owners;
3. Not meeting adequate disclosure requirements for a gift tax return and creating a permanent audit risk;
4. Creating cash flow issues for the entity or its owners.

An independent valuation professional should be able to analyze the subject company, make comparisons to industry benchmarks, incorporate economic or industry factors and provide multiple valuation methods rooted in real-time market data. They should also address interest-specific issues such as differences in distribution preferences and discounts for lack of control and marketability, and document all of their work in a detailed report that meets professional standards and reporting requirements. 

Example

One company we work with has an aging CEO/owner who is ready to turn over the reins to his capable adult son. They put together a transition plan with their former CPA and attorney which included elevated pay and salary continuation for dad as part of his buyout. As we started to review the plan, several red flags jumped out at us:

1. No actual equity got moved, so no transition was accomplished.
2. Dad got taxed at ordinary rates rather than at lower cap gain rates (and didn’t use the basis in his shares to reduce the gain).
3. We couldn’t unwind the old transaction and 409A deductions were taken — something the IRS frowns upon.

While the faulty transition plan could not be completely rectified, we were able to salvage it by gifting the equity to match what should have been part of the original deal in a stock purchase agreement. However, the company suffered in three important ways:

1. It lost the ability to use that basis and a higher tax rate for dad.
2. The gift tax could not be avoided on the gift.
3. It incurred significant additional legal, consulting and compliance expenses.

Tax planning plays a crucial role in minimizing tax liabilities associated with ownership transition and maximizing after-tax proceeds for all parties involved. The finance team should collaborate with tax advisors to devise tax-efficient strategies tailored to the specific circumstances of the transition. This may include structuring the transaction to leverage tax benefits, utilizing available exemptions or credits, and implementing estate planning techniques to optimize tax outcomes for owners and stakeholders. Doing homework on the valuation side can save lots of time and money on the tax-planning side down the road.  

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Crooks R Us

Published

on

The shadow knows; body of evidence; make a Note of it; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Newark, New Jersey: Thomas Nicholas Salzano, a.k.a. Nicholas Salzano, of Secaucus, New Jersey, the shadow CEO of National Realty Investment Advisors, has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for orchestrating a $658 million Ponzi scheme and conspiring to evade millions in taxes.

Salzano previously pleaded guilty to securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud the U.S., admitting that he made numerous misrepresentations to investors while he secretly ran National Realty. From February 2018 through January 2022, Salzano and others defrauded investors and potential investors of NRIA Partners Portfolio Fund I, a real estate fund operated by National Realty, of $650 million.

Salzano and his conspirators executed their scheme through an aggressive multiyear, nationwide marketing campaign that involved thousands of emails to investors, advertisements, and meetings and presentations to investors. Salzano led and directed the marketing campaign that was intended to mislead investors into believing that NRIA generated significant profits. It in fact generated little to no profits and operated as a Ponzi scheme.

Salzano stole millions of dollars of investor money to support his lavish lifestyle, including expensive dinners, extravagant birthday parties, and payments to family and associates who did not work at NRIA. He also orchestrated a separate, related conspiracy to avoid paying taxes on his stolen funds.

He was also sentenced to three years of supervised release and agreed to a forfeiture money judgment of $8.52 million, full restitution of $507.4 million to the victims of his offenses and $6.46 million to the IRS.

Marina del Rey, California: Tax preparer Lidiya Gessese has been sentenced to 41 months in prison for preparing and filing false returns for her clients and for not reporting her income.

Gessese owned and operated Tax We R/Tax R Us and Insurance Services from 2013 through 2019 and charged clients $300 to $800. Gessese would then prepare returns that included claims to deductions and credits she knew her clients were not entitled to, including falsely claiming dependents, earned income credits, the American Opportunity Credit, Child Tax Credits, business deductions, education expenses or unreimbursed employee business expenses. The illegitimate claims led to some $1,135,554.64 issued by the IRS for 2010 through 2018.

She failed to report, or underreported, her own income for 2010 through 2018, some of which included improperly diverted funds from clients’ inflated or fraudulent refunds, causing a tax loss of $488,276.

Gessese, who pleaded guilty in April, was also ordered to pay $1,096,034.01 to the IRS and $53,526.95 to her other victims.

Fullerton, California: In Chun Jung of Anaheim, California, owner of an auto repair business, has pleaded guilty to filing false returns for 2015 to 2022, underreporting his income by at least $1,184,914.

He owned and operated JY JBMT INC., d.b.a. JY Auto Body, which was registered as a subchapter S corp. Jung was the 100% shareholder.

Jung accepted check payments from customers that he and his co-schemers then cashed at multiple area check cashing services; the cashed checks totaled some $1,157,462. Jung withheld the business receipts and income from his tax preparer and omitted them on his returns.

He will pay $300,145 in taxes due to the IRS and faces a $250,000 penalty and up to three years in prison. Sentencing is Jan. 31.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Tucson, Arizona: Tax preparer Nour Abubakr Nour, 34, has been sentenced to 30 months in prison.

Nour, who pleaded guilty a year ago, operated the tax prep business Skyman Tax and for tax years 2016 through 2018 prepared and filed at least 27 false individual federal income tax returns for clients.

These returns included falsely claimed business income that inflated refunds so that he could pay himself large prep fees. Nour’s clients had no knowledge that he was filing false tax returns under their names.

Nour was also ordered to pay $150,154 in restitution to the United States for the false tax refunds.

Farmington, Connecticut: Tax preparer Mark Legowski, 60, has been sentenced to eight months in prison, to be followed by a year of supervised release, for filing false returns.

From January 2015 through December 2017, Legowski was a self-employed accountant and tax preparer doing business as Legowski & Co. Inc. He prepared income tax returns for some 400 to 500 individual clients and some 50 to 60 businesses.

To reduce his personal income tax liability for 2015 through 2017, Legowski underreported his practice’s gross receipts by excluding some client payment checks. He then filed false personal income tax returns that failed to report more than $1.4 million in business income, which resulted in a loss to the IRS of $499,289.

Legowski, who pleaded guilty earlier this year, has paid the IRS that amount in back taxes but must still pay penalties and interest. He has also been ordered to pay a $10,000 fine.

Wheeling, West Virginia: Dr. Nitesh Ratnakar, 48, has been convicted of failing to pay nearly $2.5 million in payroll taxes.

Ratnakar, who was found guilty of 41 counts of tax fraud, owned and operated a gastroenterology practice and a medical equipment manufacturer in Elkins, West Virginia. He withheld payroll taxes from employees’ paychecks and failed to make $2,419,560 in required payments to the IRS. Ratnakar also filed false tax returns in 2020, 2021 and 2022.

He faces up to five years in prison for each of the first 38 tax fraud counts and up to three years for the remaining counts.

Orlando, Florida: Two men have been sentenced for their involvement in the “Note Program,” a tax fraud.

Jasen Harvey, of Tampa, Florida, was sentenced to four years in prison and Christopher Johnson, of Orlando, was sentenced to 37 months for conspiring to defraud the U.S.

From 2015 to 2018, they promoted a scheme in which Harvey and others prepared returns for clients that claimed that large, nonexistent income tax withholdings had been paid to the IRS and sought large refunds based on those purported withholdings. The conspirators charged fees and required the clients to pay a share of the fraudulently obtained refunds to them.

Overall, the defendants claimed more than $3 million in fraudulent refunds on clients’ returns, of which the IRS paid about $1.5 million.

Both were also ordered to serve three years of supervised release. Johnson was also ordered to pay $864,117.42 in restitution to the United States; Harvey was ordered to pay $785,858.42 in restitution. Co-defendant Arthur Grimes will be sentenced on Jan. 13.

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida: Tax preparer Jean Volvick Moise, 39, has been sentenced to three years in prison for filing false income tax returns.

Moise prepared false returns for clients to inflate refunds. He prepared returns which included, among other things, false dependents, false 1099 withholdings, false educational credits and false Schedule C expenses, often for businesses which did not exist. Moise’s fee was larger than the typical one charged by a tax preparer.

Moise filed hundreds of false returns that caused the IRS to issue more than $574,000 in fraudulent refunds.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting in 2025: The year ahead in numbers

Published

on

With 2025 almost upon us, it’s worth thinking about what the new year will bring, and what accounting firms expect their next 12 months to look like.

With that in mind, Accounting Today conducted its annual Year Ahead survey in the late fall to find out firms’ expectations for 2025, including their growth expectations, their hiring plans, their growth expectations, how they think tax season will play out and much more. The overall theme: Thing are going well, but there are elements of friction holding them back, particularly when it comes to moving to more of a focus on advisory services.

You can see the full report here; a selection of key data points are presented below.

Continue Reading

Accounting

On the move: Withum marks over a decade of Withum Week of Caring

Published

on


Citrin Cooperman appoints CIO; PKF O’Connor Davies opens new Fort Lauderdale office; and more news from across the profession.

Continue Reading

Trending