Connect with us

Accounting

Now’s the time to review your accounting firm’s WISP

Published

on

Even as tax pros emerge from yet another fall busy season, only to take a breath and prepare for next year, knowing where you stand on data security is a year-round priority. It is at this time, in particular, that you need to give attention to your WISP.

For those still unfamiliar with the concept, a written information security plan is a mandatory, comprehensive document for accountants, CPAs and tax professionals that outlines a firm’s strategy to safeguard sensitive client data from unauthorized access, theft or misuse. Moreover, a well-structured WISP is essential for complying with federal and state regulations — such as IRS requirements (Publication 4557) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act — maintaining client trust and upholding professional credibility.

So, if your WISP is even more than a year old, or perhaps whatever security plan you have is scattered across spreadsheets and emails, then it’s time for a thorough review. I would even go so far as to say an updated and tested WISP is no longer just a compliance checkbox; it is a core element of effective risk management and business resilience.

5 reasons why last year’s WISP may not be enough

  1. Legal compliance: For tax professionals, having a WISP is not optional; it’s a legal requirement. When renewing your PTIN on IRS Form W-12, Question 11 specifically asks you to confirm that you have a WISP in place. Providing a false response is considered perjury and may lead to serious consequences, including PTIN termination or even revocation of your license.
  2. Ransomware and resilience: The threats have evolved and changed. According to a report by Mimecast, the human element is often the primary cause of breaches, and ransomware remains a persistent threat. This underscores the need to prioritize access controls, phishing resilience and regular response rehearsals. Tools alone should not be the focus — your plan must center on people and processes, supported by clear metrics and benchmarks to demonstrate effectiveness.
  3. Mandatory breach notification: If you store or process financial data of customers, the Federal Trade Commission Safeguards Rule now requires you to notify the FTC of any breach within 30 days if the breach has affected more than 500 customers. This change should be reflected in your incident-response section and standard operating procedures.
  4. New tech, new risks: Your business has changed, too. If you have undergone migration to new SaaS platforms, AI adoption, M&A, new data flows, remote hires or fresh third‑party integrations, all these changes affect your cybersecurity requirements and the nature of potential threats. If the WISP does not reflect today’s asset inventory, data classifications and vendor list, it can’t guide today’s risk-mitigating decisions and policies.
  5. Increased expectations: Regulators have raised expectations. NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has introduced a new governance function and clarified outcomes across risk management, supply chain, and measurement. Even if you don’t want to align with NIST CSF, most customers, auditors and cyber insurers align with it now. Updating your WISP to be in sync with CSF 2.0 lends it authenticity and makes it trustworthy.

What should be in your WISP?

Once you’ve made the move to update your WISP, here are several essential items it should contain and specifically address:

  1. Governance and risk management: Start with accountability and clear oversight. Define who in your firm is responsible for it (or who is engaged by it). Whether it’s leadership, IT (internal or external), legal or HR, they need to set reporting cadences and escalation thresholds. The WISP should also classify data (public, internal, confidential, regulated) and show how risk assessments shape budgets, controls and exception handling.
  2. Information assets and access controls: Your plan must track every asset — endpoints, databases, cloud apps and privileged accounts — and keep this inventory updated. Just as important is access: A phishing-resistant multifactor authentication, and automated joiner/mover/leaver workflows, all reduce risk from both insiders and attackers.
  3. Secure operations and technology use: Security should be built into everyday processes, from code reviews and dependency scans to documented change approvals and rollbacks. With new tools like AI and LLMs, your WISP must outline safe usage policies to protect data and avoid unintended exposure. 
  4. Third-party oversight and incident response: Vendors handling client data must be vetted, monitored and contractually bound to security standards. Your WISP should also detail how incidents are handled — who decides materiality, how regulators like the FTC are notified within 30 days, and how communication is managed. 
  5. Resilience, awareness and continuous improvement: Resilience means tested backups, disaster recovery plans and measurable employee awareness training. A modern WISP tracks security metrics like multifactor authentication adoption and patch compliance, while aligning with standards like ISO 27001 and NIST CSF 2.0 to stay audit-ready.

DIY vs. managed WISP

While some firms try to build and maintain a WISP on their own, this DIY route can be time-consuming and often overlooks evolving regulations or hidden risks. A managed WISP solution, by contrast, brings expert oversight, regular updates and tested playbooks that keep you audit-ready and compliant with IRS and FTC expectations. 

For practices without in-house security expertise, outsourcing WISP management to an experienced, knowledgeable managed service provider can save time, reduce risk and provide confidence that client data is protected to the highest standards.

Protect your organization with a robust WISP

As things hopefully begin to wind down for you this year, right now is the best window to review or construct your WISP. An outdated WISP isn’t just a compliance issue, it’s a business risk. 

Updating it now ensures you’re ready for IRS and FTC requirements, resilient against evolving threats, and positioned to protect the client trust that drives your practice.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending