Connect with us

Economics

Optimism is growing around the UK economy amid U.S.-EU trade disputes

Published

on

UK inflation story is getting better despite hot January print, economist says

LONDON — Some investors are expressing a growing optimism about the U.K.’s economic outlook despite the country’s long-standing structural weaknesses, as its neighbors in the European Union deepen their trade dispute with the United States.

That upbeat tone wasn’t reflected in the messaging of the Bank of England, as it held interest rates steady last Thursday, citing increased geopolitical uncertainty and indicators of financial market volatility. However, U.K. economic growth — tepid at best for the last three years — is finally expected to pick up somewhat in 2025, with Bank of America analysts forecasting a 1.4% expansion.

Inflation is still expected to cool back near-target in the months ahead, the labor market is loosening but remains robust, and the U.K. government has a determined focus — at times controversially — to support growth and reduce the national deficit.

Sanjay Raja, chief U.K. economist at Deutsche Bank, said that, on a recent client trip to the U.S. he noted a “budding sense of optimism” around the U.K. not seen in some time.

Key factors included a pivot toward deregulation and focus on more capital spending, the potential for a strong trade deal with the EU in the coming year, and an expectation the the U.K. will “stay in the US’ ‘good books’ as a trade war kicks off,” Raja said in a note earlier this month.

U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed a willingness to spare the U.K. from blanket or targeted tariffs, with expectations bolstered after U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer conducted a friendly trip to the White House in February.

EU flags flutter in front of European Central Bank (ECB) headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany July 18, 2024. 

EU delays implementing first retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods to middle of April

“Talk of a U.S. trade deal also surfaced in client conversations, and there was increased optimism that the U.K. may be spared from direct and widespread tariffs,” Raja said.

Some felt “structural growth could be on the rise after a steady decline since the global financial crisis,” he continued, while a broad European push to increase national defense spending could benefit U.K. corporates. Points of concern for investors remained January’s sell-off in U.K. government debt, fiscal headroom and the sustainability of spending cuts, Raja observed.

Still trade risks

The U.K. may have been spared the worst of Trump’s rhetoric so far — such as his threat of 200% tariffs on EU alcohol imports — but it is not totally immune from Washington’s protectionist push.

Gabriella Dickens, G7 economist at AXA Investment Managers, noted that the U.K. still faces a hit due to the new U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum. The U.K. exported a total of £370 million ($479.7 million) in steel to the U.S. in 2024, according to trade group UK Steel, accounting for 9% of total U.K. steel exports by value. Britain’s aluminum exports to the U.S. totaled were valued at around £225 million last year, the U.K.’s Aluminium Federation says.

The U.K. will also be impacted by any slowdown in global trade, including if this leads to weaker demand in its key partners such as the EU, and if general uncertainty erodes business and consumer confidence, Dickens told CNBC.

“Investor sentiment may be boosted if the U.K. manages to avoid further tariffs, particularly if trade tensions ramp up with the EU,” Dickens said. In the unlikely event Trump follows through with his prior threat of blanket 25% tariffs on the EU, a “material boost” would be provided to the U.K. as manufacturers would likely look to relocate, she said.

EU flags flutter in front of European Central Bank (ECB) headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany July 18, 2024. 

EU delays implementing first retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods to middle of April

The U.K. could still avoid further tariffs, since it has no large trade surplus with the U.S. and the majority of that is services-based. It has already pledged to boost its defense spending as a share of gross domestic product (GDP), avoiding much of Trump’s ire with other nations.

“Neither of these have spared the U.K. from the steel and aluminum tariffs, though,” Dickens added.

Lindsay James, investment strategist at Quilter Investors, also stressed the existing impact of steel and aluminum duties on the U.K. and flagged potential risks from the reciprocal U.S. tariffs due to be announced early April.

“The idea that VAT is some kind of tariff seems to have taken hold in the White House, placing the U.K. once again at considerable risk of coming into the crosshairs of U.S. trade policy,” James told CNBC.

“Whilst the reality is likely being willfully misrepresented by the White House in order to gain a negotiating advantage, the U.K. is not yet in the clear and, if Donald Trump’s demands on Ukraine are anything to go by, any future trade deal would likely come at a heavy price.”

James added that, while the government was improving the foundations of the U.K. economy in the long run, growth remained on a weak trajectory in the near term, with businesses hit by higher costs stemming from last year’s budget and continued issues with an “older and sicker workforce.”

“Whilst the [U.K.] stock market has so far benefitted from its perception of defensiveness, a modest starting valuation and a strong performance from heavily represented sectors such as oil and gas and financials, the divergence from the performance of the economy could lead to the large cap index continuing to outperform domestic stocks,” she said.

Economics

UK Has a New Prime Minister Without a General Election

Published

on

UK Has a New Prime Minister Without a General Election

On July 20, Andy Burnham has been chosen to be the next Prime Minister in UK. The appointment of a new Prime Minister in the United Kingdom often raises questions from people outside the country, especially when no nationwide election has taken place. Many wonder how a new national leader can assume office without voters casting ballots. The answer lies in the UK’s parliamentary system, where the Prime Minister is not directly elected by the public but is instead chosen based on who commands the confidence of the House of Commons.

How the UK Selects Its Prime Minister

Unlike presidential systems where citizens vote directly for the head of government, the United Kingdom elects Members of Parliament (MPs) during a general election. The political party that secures a majority of seats in the House of Commons usually forms the government, and that party selects its own leader to serve as Prime Minister.

If the leader resigns, becomes unable to continue, or is replaced by their party, the governing party can choose a new leader without triggering a general election. As long as the new leader is able to maintain the confidence of Parliament, they can immediately become Prime Minister after being formally appointed by the monarch.

Why No Election Was Required

A general election is not automatically required every time the office of Prime Minister changes hands. The governing party retains its parliamentary majority because voters elected MPs rather than an individual Prime Minister. If the ruling party chooses a new leader through its internal leadership process, the government continues to operate without interruption.

This constitutional arrangement provides stability and allows the government to continue functioning during periods of political transition. It also avoids the expense and disruption of holding a nationwide election every time party leadership changes.

The King’s Constitutional Role

After a governing party elects a new leader, the monarch invites that individual to form a government. This constitutional step is largely ceremonial and follows long-established conventions. The King appoints the person most likely to command a majority in the House of Commons, ensuring continuity of government.

Although the monarch formally appoints the Prime Minister, political power rests with Parliament and the elected representatives of the British people.

Could an Election Still Happen?

Yes. A newly appointed Prime Minister has the authority to request a general election if they believe it is politically advantageous or if they seek a stronger public mandate. Parliament can also reach a point where a government loses the confidence of the House of Commons, potentially leading to an election or the formation of a new government.

In many cases, however, a new Prime Minister continues governing until the next scheduled general election.

What This Means for the UK

The UK’s parliamentary democracy is designed to ensure government continuity while respecting the results of the most recent general election. Leadership changes within the governing party do not automatically alter the composition of Parliament, which is why a new Prime Minister can take office without another nationwide vote.

Understanding this process helps explain why political transitions in the United Kingdom can appear different from those in countries with presidential systems. While the Prime Minister may change, the democratic mandate of Parliament remains in place until voters elect a new House of Commons at the next general election.

Continue Reading

Economics

Global Grid Upgrades Reshape Macro Economics

Published

on

Global grid upgrades reshape macro economics

On July 21, 2026, global economic analysis shifts focus toward a defining structural macroeconomic trend: the massive expansion of public and private capital deployment into high-capacity electrical grid infrastructure. As industrial electrification, automated data center hubs, and renewable energy integration accelerate worldwide, sovereign governments and institutional investors are facing a monumental economic challenge. Updating legacy power grids to meet skyrocketing demand has emerged as a primary driver of long-term capital expenditures and industrial productivity across both developed and emerging market economies.

According to international economic policy updates released this week, grid infrastructure investments are projected to exceed multi-trillion-dollar thresholds over the coming decade. Economic planners caution that without modernized, high-voltage transmission networks, regional manufacturing sectors face severe energy bottlenecks, localized power price volatility, and operational constraints. Consequently, infrastructure spending is rapidly transitioning from passive utility maintenance into a vital component of national economic competitiveness and industrial policy.

The macroeconomic ripple effects of this capital deployment are being felt across global commodity markets and labor networks. High demand for structural industrial inputs—such as copper, aluminum, specialized electrical steel, and high-capacity transformers—has created sustained pricing support for critical material producers. Simultaneously, the specialized technical labor required to manufacture and deploy modern grid hardware is driving wage growth in industrial sectors, adding a complex new layer to central bank disinflation trajectories.

For global policymakers and strategic investors, the economics of energy grid modernization represent a double-edged sword. While massive infrastructure investment boosts short-term gross domestic product (GDP) and strengthens domestic industrial foundations, it requires disciplined fiscal allocation to prevent inflationary crowding-out of private capital. Countries that efficiently streamline grid infrastructure permitting and mobilize private investment will secure lower long-term energy costs, attracting high-tech manufacturing and reinforcing sustainable economic growth.

Continue Reading

Economics

Global Trade Realignment and Supply Chains in 2026

Published

on

Global Trade Realignment and Supply Chains in 2026

The international trade architecture entering the second half of 2026 is undergoing a profound structural pivot. As major sovereign economic blocs adjust to the long-term impact of unilateral tariffs and escalating regional subsidies, traditional globalized supply chains are being rapidly replaced by bilateral trade corridors and regional alliance networks. Data released in late July 2026 highlights a significant divergence: while cross-continental freight volumes between non-aligned partners have cooled, intra-regional trade throughout North America, Southeast Asia, and Eastern Europe has surged to record levels. This shift reflects a broader macroeconomic strategy wherein multinational corporations prioritize geopolitical resilience over pure cost minimization.

The primary economic catalyst behind this regionalization is the proliferation of sector-specific tariffs targeting critical industries, notably battery components, clean energy technology, and advanced semiconductor hardware. In response, global manufacturers have adopted multi-tier sourcing models that distribute production across intermediate partner nations before final assembly. While this strategy successfully bypasses primary import duties, it adds structural layers of logistical complexity and administrative oversight. Economists note that while total output remains robust, aggregate production costs have drifted upward, contributing to persistent baseline inflation across major consumer markets.

Simultaneously, currency settlement patterns within these regional blocs are experiencing a notable transformation. Sovereign central banks and commercial institutions are increasingly utilizing localized currency swap lines and digital clearing mechanisms to settle cross-border trade transactions. This transition reduces direct exposure to foreign exchange volatility and mitigates third-party liquidity constraints, further solidifying regional economic cohesion. However, for developing economies situated outside these primary trading alliances, the tightening of international trade networks presents severe challenges, restricting access to key export markets and foreign direct investment.

For corporate strategists and policy analysts navigating late 2026, success requires a thorough understanding of these emerging trade corridors. Organizations must conduct regular risk assessments of their multi-tier supplier networks, model tariff sensitivities under shifting geopolitical scenarios, and invest in real-time supply chain telemetry. As regional economic blocs strengthen their regulatory borders, supply chain agility and compliance fortitude will distinguish market leaders from vulnerable enterprises in the evolving global economy.

Continue Reading

Trending